The North Dakota Research and Experimental Expenditure Tax Credit provides a 15-year carryforward period for unused credits. This statutory window, codified under N.D.C.C. § 57-38-30.5, allows taxpayers to apply unused credits against future state income tax liabilities after exhausting a mandatory three-year carryback. This extended period is designed to support capital-intensive enterprises and innovation in sectors like agriculture, energy, and advanced manufacturing by preserving the economic value of research investments during pre-profitability phases.
The maximum carry forward period of fifteen years for the North Dakota Research and Experimental Expenditure Tax Credit constitutes a statutory window allowing taxpayers to apply unused credits against future state income tax liabilities after exhausting a mandatory three-year carryback. This provision, codified under N.D.C.C. § 57-38-30.5, ensures that capital-intensive enterprises can preserve the economic value of their research investments during extended periods of pre-profitability or market volatility.
Within the specific framework of the North Dakota Century Code, the fifteen-year carry forward represents a legislative commitment to long-term economic development by mitigating the tax burden on innovation. Unlike many other state-level credits that may expire within three to five years, the research credit acknowledges the protracted nature of the product development lifecycle, particularly in sectors such as agriculture, energy, and advanced manufacturing. By providing a nearly two-decade window for utilization—when combining the three-year carryback and the fifteen-year carryforward—the state effectively subsidizes the risk of high-failure, high-reward technological experimentation. This mechanism operates as a deferred asset on the corporate balance sheet, where credits generated in a high-expense research year can be utilized as far back as three years prior to recover previously paid taxes, or tracked forward to offset future liabilities as the business matures and achieves taxable income.
Statutory Foundations and Legislative Intent of N.D.C.C. § 57-38-30.5
The legal architecture for the Research and Experimental Expenditure Tax Credit was established through the passage of 1987 House Bill No. 1645. At its inception, the North Dakota Legislative Assembly sought to emulate successful economic models from other states, most notably Minnesota, which had demonstrated that robust tax incentives for research and development could significantly stimulate regional economic growth. The original enactment provided a corporate income tax credit equal to 8% of the first $1.5 million of North Dakota qualified research expenses in excess of the base period research expenses, and 4% of any amount exceeding that threshold. Notably, even in 1987, the legislature recognized the need for durability in these credits, establishing the three-year carryback and fifteen-year carryforward periods that remain central to the statute today.
The legislative history indicates that the perceived goal was to encourage both new and existing North Dakota corporations to undertake high-level technological research. Over the subsequent decades, the credit underwent several structural transformations to broaden its accessibility and impact. A major restructuring occurred in the 2007 legislative session with the passage of House Bill Nos. 1412 and 1018. House Bill No. 1412 was particularly significant as it expanded the availability of the research expense tax credit to passthrough entities, ensuring that partnerships, S corporations, and limited liability companies could utilize the incentive to the same degree as traditional C corporations. This expansion acknowledged the shifting landscape of business organization, where a significant portion of innovative activity was being conducted by entities that do not pay taxes at the corporate level but rather pass credits through to individual owners.
Further amendments in 2011 and 2017 introduced tiered percentages and special provisions for small businesses. The legislature also added safeguards, such as subsection 11 of N.D.C.C. § 57-38-30.5, which ensures that the state credit remains effective and referenced to federal definitions even if the federal research tax credit were to be discontinued. This “permanent” nature of the credit distinguishes it from many other state incentives that are subject to frequent sunset dates, providing a stable horizon for corporate tax departments and R&D planners.
Mechanical Definitions and Calculation Methodologies
The North Dakota credit is designed as an incremental tax credit, meaning it is not calculated on the total amount of research spending, but rather on the “excess” spending above a defined “base amount”. This structure ensures that the state is incentivizing new or increased research activity rather than merely subsidizing existing, routine operations. To maintain consistency and reduce administrative burdens for taxpayers, the state largely “federalizes” its definitions, adopting the terminology and standards found in Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Qualified Research and the Four-Part Test
For expenses to qualify for the North Dakota credit, they must meet the federal definition of “qualified research” under I.R.C. § 41(d), with the critical localized caveat that the research must be conducted entirely within the state of North Dakota. To satisfy this definition, a taxpayer must demonstrate that their activity passes the “Four-Part Test” established by federal guidelines:
- Permitted Purpose: The research must be intended to develop a new or improved business component, defined as a product, process, computer software, technique, formula, or invention to be held for sale, lease, or license, or used in the taxpayer’s trade or business.
- Technological in Nature: The process of experimentation used to discover information must fundamentally rely on principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.
- Elimination of Uncertainty: The activity must be intended to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the capability or method for developing or improving a business component, or the appropriateness of its design.
- Process of Experimentation: Substantially all of the activities must constitute a process of experimentation involving the evaluation of alternatives through modeling, simulation, or systematic trial and error.
Regular Incremental Method vs. Alternative Simplified Computation
North Dakota provides two distinct paths for calculating the credit, allowing taxpayers to elect the method that best fits their historical spending patterns and data availability. The election is made on a year-to-year basis and is binding for the tax year for which it is made.
The Regular Incremental Method calculates the credit based on the excess of North Dakota qualified research expenses (QREs) over a base amount. The “base amount” is generally a fixed-base percentage of the taxpayer’s average annual gross receipts for the preceding four years, though the state caps the QREs at 50% of the base amount in certain circumstances to prevent extreme fluctuations.
| Method | Expenditure Bracket | Credit Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Regular Method | First $100,000 of Excess QREs | 25% |
| Regular Method | Excess QREs over $100,000 | 8% |
| ASC Method | First $100,000 of ASC Excess | 17.5% |
| ASC Method | ASC Excess over $100,000 | 5.6% |
| ASC Method (No Prior 3-Year QREs) | First $100,000 of Total QREs | 7.5% |
| ASC Method (No Prior 3-Year QREs) | Total QREs over $100,000 | 2.4% |
The Alternative Simplified Computation (ASC) method, introduced for tax years beginning after 2018, mirrors the federal ASC. Under this method, the credit is based on the excess of current-year QREs over 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding tax years. This is particularly advantageous for “start-up” companies or businesses that may have high historical gross receipts but are only recently expanding their R&D efforts in North Dakota.
The Carryover Lifecycle: From Generation to Expiration
The fifteen-year carryforward period is the final phase of a credit’s lifecycle. Taxpayers must navigate a strict hierarchy of utilization dictated by the Office of State Tax Commissioner. The primary rule of credit application is that credits must first be used to offset the current year’s income tax liability. Any remaining balance then enters the carryover phase.
The Mandatory Three-Year Carryback
Before a taxpayer can carry an unused credit forward into the fifteen-year window, they must first carry the credit back to the three preceding taxable years. This is a mandatory requirement intended to provide immediate liquidity to businesses that have been profitable in the recent past but are currently investing heavily in research. The credit is applied to the earliest of the three preceding years first (Year -3), then Year -2, and finally Year -1.
The administrative window for this carryback is time-sensitive. A claim to carry back credits must be filed within three years of the due date (or extended due date) of the return for the taxable year in which the credit was originally earned. If a taxpayer fails to file an amended return or a refund claim within this three-year statute of limitations, they effectively forfeit the ability to use the credit against those prior years, though the credit typically still retains its fifteen-year forward eligibility for future offsets.
The Fifteen-Year Carryforward Window
If an unused portion of the credit remains after the mandatory carryback, it may be carried forward for up to fifteen succeeding taxable years. This is one of the most generous carryforward periods in the North Dakota tax code. For comparison, other incentives like the Seed Capital Investment Credit are limited to a four-year carryover, and the Automation Tax Credit is limited to five years.
The fifteen-year duration acknowledges that modern technological development—particularly in fields like biotechnology or advanced energy systems—can take a decade or more to reach commercial viability and generate taxable income. By allowing the credit to sit as a “tax asset” on the balance sheet for fifteen years, North Dakota ensures that the financial incentive remains relevant throughout the entire product lifecycle. At the end of the fifteenth carryforward year, any remaining credit balance expires and is permanently disallowed.
Ordering Rules for Multiple Credits
Taxpayers often manage a portfolio of various state tax incentives. The North Dakota Administrative Code (81-03-01.1) provides specific ordering rules for how these credits must be applied against a taxpayer’s liability in any given year. This hierarchy ensures that the most “at-risk” credits (those that expire sooner) are prioritized over those with longer carryover windows.
| Priority | Credit Category | Example Incentives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Credits with no carryover | Workforce Recruitment (certain years) |
| 2 | Credits with carryback provisions | Research and Experimental Expenditures |
| 3 | Credits with carryforward only | Angel Investor Investment Credit |
If a taxpayer has multiple credits within the same priority level, they are permitted to apply them in the order that is most beneficial to their specific tax scenario. For the research credit, this means it is generally used before credits that have shorter forward windows, such as the 5-year carryforward for Biodiesel fuel blending.
Revenue Office Guidance and Procedural Compliance
The North Dakota Office of State Tax Commissioner serves as the primary regulatory body overseeing the administration of the research credit. Their guidance emphasizes that while the credit is generous, it is contingent upon strict adherence to filing and documentation standards. Taxpayers who fail to comply with these requirements risk disallowance of both current-year claims and any carried-over balances.
Filing Requirements and Form Instructions
To claim the credit, taxpayers must attach a detailed schedule or worksheet to their North Dakota income tax return for the year the credit is earned. This worksheet must clearly outline the calculation of North Dakota QREs and the base amount. For individual taxpayers, the credit is reported on Schedule ND-1TC, Line 9a. For corporations, it is reported on Form 40, Schedule TC, with separate lines for credits generated by the taxpayer (Line 6) and credits purchased from other taxpayers (Line 7).
A critical administrative distinction exists for “purchased” credits. While credits generated by the taxpayer can be carried back three years and forward fifteen, credits that are “purchased” from another taxpayer (under the qualified small business transfer rules) do not inherit these carryover provisions. A purchaser of a research credit must apply it to their current year’s liability or as otherwise specified in the purchase agreement, but they cannot carry it back to their own prior-year returns.
The Property Tax Clearance Requirement
Effective August 1, 2017, the North Dakota legislature implemented a “Tax Compliance Requirement” for several state incentives, including the research credit. Under N.D.C.C. § 54-35-26, a taxpayer may not claim the research credit unless they have satisfied all state and local tax obligations.
To verify this, a taxpayer claiming the research credit must complete and include a “Property Tax Clearance Record” form with their tax return. This requirement applies if the corporation (or its responsible officers) owns a 50% or more interest in real property in any North Dakota county. A new property tax clearance record must be obtained and attached for every year the credit is claimed, even if the taxpayer is merely using a carryover from a prior year. For electronic filers, this document must be attached as a PDF.
Audit Standards and Documentation
The Tax Department maintains the authority to audit research credit claims, and the burden of proof rests entirely with the taxpayer. Audit guidelines recommend that taxpayers retain project-level documentation for at least the duration of the 15-year carryforward period, plus the standard three-year statute of limitations for the final year of use. Key documentation includes:
- Employee Labor Records: Contemporary logs or time-tracking data that identify which employees worked on specific research projects and the percentage of their time dedicated to qualified activities.
- Technical Substantiation: Project descriptions, prototypes, test results, and patent applications that prove the taxpayer followed a “process of experimentation” to eliminate technological uncertainty.
- North Dakota Sourcing: Proof that all QREs were incurred for research conducted within the state. This often requires identifying the physical location where the labor was performed and where the supplies were consumed.
The Strategic Role of the Qualified Research and Development Company
To assist emerging primary sector businesses that may not have the tax liability to utilize a 15-year carryforward, North Dakota law allows for the “monetization” of these credits through sale or transfer. This provision is specifically targeted at small, innovative startups that need immediate cash flow rather than a long-term tax asset.
Eligibility for Credit Transfer
A taxpayer may sell, transfer, or assign up to $100,000 of its unused tax credit to another taxpayer if it is certified by the North Dakota Department of Commerce as a “qualified research and development company”. The requirements for this certification are exhaustive:
- Primary Sector Certification: The business must be certified as a “primary sector business,” meaning it adds value to a product, process, or service through the employment of knowledge or labor, resulting in the creation of new wealth.
- Revenue Limit: The business must have annual gross revenues of less than $750,000.
- New Research: The company must have conducted qualified research in North Dakota for the first time after December 31, 2006.
Procedural Mechanics of the Transfer
Once certified, the transferor and the transferee must jointly file “Form CTS – Credit Transfer Statement” within thirty days of the execution of the purchase agreement. The transferor must report the gross proceeds received from the sale, and the Tax Commissioner is authorized to disclose tax information to either party to verify the correctness of the transferred credit. This transparency is vital for ensuring the integrity of the state’s tax base while providing the intended liquidity to the startup ecosystem.
Longitudinal Example: The Lifecycle of a Research Credit
To visualize the practical application of the 15-year carryforward, consider a hypothetical North Dakota-based firm, “Bismarck Biotech, LLC.”
Year 1: Generation and Mandatory Carryback
In 2024, Bismarck Biotech incurs $500,000 in North Dakota QREs. Their base amount is calculated to be $100,000, resulting in “excess” QREs of $400,000.
Using the Regular Method calculation:
1. First Tier: 25% * $100,000 = $25,000
2. Second Tier: 8% * ($400,000 – $100,000) = $24,000
3. Total Credit Earned: $49,000
Bismarck Biotech has a 2024 tax liability of only $2,000. They apply $2,000 to the current year, leaving an unused balance of $47,000. They must now look back to 2021, 2022, and 2023. Suppose they paid $5,000 in taxes in 2021, $3,000 in 2022, and $2,000 in 2023. They file amended returns to reclaim these taxes, using $10,000 of the credit balance. The remaining $37,000 enters the carryforward pool.
Years 2 through 16: The Carryforward Window
The remaining $37,000 is now available to offset North Dakota income tax in the succeeding 15 years (2025–2039). If Bismarck Biotech remains in a loss position for the next five years, the credit sits on the books. In 2030 (Year 6 of the carryforward), they become profitable and generate a tax liability of $10,000. They apply $10,000 of the 2024 carryover to reduce their 2030 tax to zero.
If, by the end of 2039, Bismarck Biotech still has $5,000 of the original 2024 credit remaining, that $5,000 expires and cannot be used against the 2040 liability. This illustrates the “use-it-or-lose-it” nature of the fifteen-year limit, emphasizing the importance of accurate tax forecasting.
Interplay with Federal Law and Future Outlook
The North Dakota research credit exists in a state of “perpetual federalization,” meaning changes to the federal tax code often have immediate, ripple effects on state-level filings.
The Impact of I.R.C. Section 174 Amortization
One of the most significant recent developments in the R&D landscape is the change to I.R.C. § 174, enacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, businesses are no longer allowed to immediately deduct research and experimental expenditures; they must instead capitalize and amortize them over five years for domestic research and fifteen years for foreign research.
While this change primarily affects the deduction side of the tax return, it has a profound indirect impact on the research credit. Because taxable income is now higher in the early years of a research project due to the lack of a full deduction, many North Dakota businesses are finding themselves with higher-than-expected tax liabilities in the short term. This makes the 15-year carryforward window even more critical, as it allows companies to use the credits earned from capitalized expenses to offset the increased tax burden created by the amortization requirement.
Sectoral Trends in North Dakota
North Dakota’s research credit is heavily utilized in its primary sectors, particularly as the state moves toward more technological sophistication in traditional industries.
| Sector | Primary Research Focus | Relevant Credit Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Agriculture | Robotic harvesting, value-added crop processing | Tiered 25% rate supports small farm-tech startups. |
| Energy | Carbon capture, enhanced oil recovery, hydrogen production | Large project scale often hits the 8% bracket quickly. |
| Manufacturing | Advanced automation, robotics, aerospace components | 50% QRE-to-Base cap prevents over-subsidization of mature lines. |
The Department of Commerce has allotted $3 million per year specifically for automation credits, but the research expense credit remains uncapped for most modern claimants (except for those with pre-2007 history who face a $2 million annual limit). This unlimited nature makes it one of the most powerful tools in the state’s economic development arsenal.
Strategic Implications for Business Planning
For professional tax planners and corporate executives, the 15-year carryforward requires a strategic approach to tax asset management. The long duration of the credit provides a unique opportunity for “tax smoothing,” where a company can maintain a low effective state tax rate over a long horizon despite fluctuations in profitability.
However, the “Property Tax Clearance” and “Primary Sector Certification” requirements add layers of administrative complexity. Businesses must ensure they remain in good standing not only with the State Tax Commissioner but also with the various county treasurers where they hold real estate. Failure to do so can result in a “pause” on credit utilization that may persist until the compliance issues are resolved, potentially wasting years of the 15-year carryforward window.
Furthermore, the choice between the Regular Method and the ASC Method should be evaluated annually. As a company matures and its “base amount” increases under the regular method, the ASC method often becomes the more attractive option. Because the 15-year carryforward period is identical for both methods, the decision should be driven purely by which calculation yields the higher credit amount in the current year.
Final Thoughts
The North Dakota Research and Experimental Expenditure Tax Credit, with its signature fifteen-year carryforward period, stands as a cornerstone of the state’s economic policy. By mirroring federal standards while providing localized incentives for primary sector growth, North Dakota has created a fiscal environment that supports the entire lifecycle of innovation—from the initial, loss-heavy research phase through commercialization and eventual profitability.
For the modern enterprise, the 15-year carryforward is more than just a tax benefit; it is a long-term capital management tool. It provides a robust shield against future liabilities, acknowledges the inherent risks and long timelines of high-tech development, and offers specialized pathways for small businesses to gain immediate liquidity. As the national tax landscape shifts toward amortization and capitalization of research costs, North Dakota’s stable and generous carryover provisions will continue to be a vital differentiator for businesses choosing to invest in the Peace Garden State. Success in leveraging this credit depends on meticulous documentation, proactive compliance with tax clearance mandates, and a nuanced understanding of the administrative hierarchies governing North Dakota’s revenue laws.
Who We Are:
Swanson Reed is one of the largest Specialist R&D Tax Credit advisory firm in the United States. With offices nationwide, we are one of the only firms globally to exclusively provide R&D Tax Credit consulting services to our clients. We have been exclusively providing R&D Tax Credit claim preparation and audit compliance solutions for over 30 years. Swanson Reed hosts daily free webinars and provides free IRS CE and CPE credits for CPAs.
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/






