A business component is defined as any product, process, software, technique, formula, or invention held for sale or used in trade, serving as the discrete unit for R&D credit evaluation. [cite_start]Under South Carolina law, it represents the specific asset for which a taxpayer must demonstrate technological improvement or discovery to qualify for the state’s five percent tax incentive[cite: 3].
The Statutory Foundation of the South Carolina Research Credit
The South Carolina research and development (R&D) tax credit, as established under South Carolina Code Section 12-6-3415, represents a vital component of the state’s economic strategy to foster high-tech industry and manufacturing excellence. [cite_start]Unlike the federal research credit, which often operates on an incremental basis, the South Carolina credit is structured as a non-incremental incentive equal to five percent of the qualified research expenses (QREs) incurred within the state’s borders[cite: 3].
This simplicity in the five percent rate is balanced by a rigorous adherence to federal definitions of what constitutes “qualified research,” a term that is inextricably linked to the concept of the “business component.” To appreciate the legal requirements of the South Carolina credit, one must examine the state’s conformity to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). [cite_start]South Carolina Code Section 12-6-40 establishes that the state conforms to the IRC of 1986, as amended through December 31, 2024. This conformity means that the definitions of qualified research found in IRC Section 41 are the primary authority for South Carolina tax purposes[cite: 3].
Consequently, the “business component” is the essential unit of analysis; a taxpayer cannot simply claim a credit for “innovation” in the abstract. Instead, they must identify a specific business component and prove that their research activities meet the four-part statutory test for that specific component. The South Carolina Department of Revenue (SCDOR) administers this credit through Schedule TC-18. The credit is limited to 50% of the taxpayer’s tax liability remaining after all other credits have been applied. [cite_start]Any unused credit may be carried forward for a period of up to ten years[cite: 3].
Taxonomy of Business Components: New versus Existing
The distinction between a “new” and an “existing” business component is a fundamental aspect of R&D tax planning. Under IRC Section 41(d)(2)(B), a business component is broadly defined to include any product, process, computer software, technique, formula, or invention that the taxpayer holds for sale, lease, or license, or uses in its trade or business. [cite_start]The law does not prioritize new products over the improvement of existing ones; rather, it provides a framework for evaluating both through the lens of technical advancement[cite: 3].
The New Business Component
A new business component refers to an asset that the taxpayer has not previously developed or utilized. In the context of the South Carolina R&D credit, developing a new component often involves the highest degree of technical uncertainty. For instance, a manufacturer developing a novel hydrogen fuel cell is creating a new business component. [cite_start]The research must be undertaken to discover information that is technological in nature and must involve a process of experimentation to resolve uncertainties regarding design or capability[cite: 3].
When a taxpayer initiates research for a new business component, the SCDOR examines the initial “technical uncertainty.” This uncertainty must relate to the capability or method of development, or the appropriate design of the component. If the taxpayer already knows the design and method, the activity is routine development. [cite_start]Documentation must show the taxpayer evaluated multiple alternatives or conducted simulations[cite: 3].
The Existing Business Component and Improvements
The majority of R&D activity in South Carolina’s established manufacturing sectors involves the improvement of existing business components. The statute allows for credits when research is conducted to improve the functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of an existing component. [cite_start]This “improvement” standard is rigorous and excludes routine quality control or cosmetic alterations[cite: 3].
The following table summarizes the four pillars of qualifying improvements as recognized under the South Carolina and federal frameworks:
| Category of Improvement | Objective Criteria for Qualification | Technical Outcome Required |
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | Development of new features or capabilities. | The component can perform tasks it previously could not. |
| Performance | Enhancing speed, efficiency, or output. | Reduced cycle times, higher throughput, or lower energy consumption. |
| Reliability | Reducing failure rates or operational downtime. | Improved mean time between failures (MTBF) or enhanced durability. |
| Quality | Improving material specifications or technical precision. | Higher purity levels, tighter tolerances, or better structural integrity. |
The challenge for South Carolina taxpayers is distinguishing between “qualified improvements” and “adaptation.” [cite_start]Under IRC Section 41(d)(4)(B), any research related to the adaptation of an existing business component to a particular customer’s requirement is specifically excluded[cite: 3].
The Four-Part Test: A South Carolina Regulatory Perspective
[cite_start]
The South Carolina Department of Revenue relies on the federal “Four-Part Test” to determine the eligibility of expenses associated with a business component[cite: 3].
1. The Section 174 Test (Permitted Purpose)
The research must be undertaken for the purpose of discovering information intended to be useful in the development of a new or improved business component. [cite_start]The information discovered must eliminate uncertainty concerning capability, method, or design[cite: 3].
2. The Technological in Nature Test
The process of experimentation must fundamentally rely on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science. [cite_start]This test serves to exclude “soft sciences”[cite: 3].
3. The Process of Experimentation Test
“Substantially all” of the research activities—interpreted as at least 80%—must constitute a process of experimentation. [cite_start]This involves the systematic evaluation of alternatives, such as through modeling, simulation, or trial and error[cite: 3].
4. The Qualified Purpose Test
The research must relate to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality. [cite_start]This test ensures the credit is not used for routine data collection or market research[cite: 3].
Local State Revenue Office Guidance and Administrative Rules
[cite_start]
The SCDOR provides guidance through various channels, including statutes, revenue rulings, and information letters[cite: 3].
Revenue Ruling #08-3: R&D Machines and Definitions
SCDOR Revenue Ruling #08-3 clarifies that “research and development” means activities in the “experimental or laboratory sense.” [cite_start]It establishes a “primary use” requirement for equipment, stating that more than 50% of a machine’s use must be devoted to qualifying R&D[cite: 3].
The Role of Schedule TC-18
The primary mechanism for claiming the credit is Schedule TC-18. [cite_start]The taxpayer must claim the federal income tax credit under IRC Section 41 for the same taxable year to be eligible for the South Carolina credit[cite: 3].
Conformity and Statutory Limitations
South Carolina’s conformity to the IRC is updated annually. [cite_start]As of 2024, the state adopts the IRC as amended through December 31, 2024. The Research Expenses Credit is applied after all other credits and can only offset up to 50% of the remaining liability[cite: 3].
| Tax Liability Component | Hypothetical Scenario A | Hypothetical Scenario B |
|---|---|---|
| Gross SC Income Tax Liability | $500,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Other Credits (e.g., Jobs Credit) | ($100,000) | ($600,000) |
| Remaining Tax Liability | $400,000 | $400,000 |
| 50% Limitation Cap | $200,000 | $200,000 |
| Calculated 5% R&D Credit | $150,000 | $250,000 |
| Usable R&D Credit (Current Year) | $150,000 | $200,000 |
| R&D Credit Carryforward | $0 | $50,000 |
Procedural Implications: The Overhaul of Form 6765
For tax years beginning in 2024 and 2025, the IRS has expanded reporting requirements on Form 6765. Because South Carolina requires a federal claim, these changes impact state filers. [cite_start]Every dollar claimed must be allocated to a specific business component[cite: 3].
The Shrinking Back Rule: Sub-Component Eligibility
Under the “Shrinking Back Rule,” if a large-scale project fails the four-part test as a whole, the tests are applied to the next most significant subset of elements. [cite_start]The burden remains on the taxpayer to provide records at the sub-component level[cite: 3].
Federal Legislation and Conformity: The OBBBA and Section 174
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) restored the ability of businesses to immediately expense domestic R&E costs through a new Section 174A. [cite_start]South Carolina’s conformity means this has a massive impact on the state’s business climate[cite: 3].
Impact on South Carolina Taxpayers
Small businesses are permitted to apply this change retroactively to tax years 2022, 2023, and 2024, creating refund opportunities. [cite_start]Most South Carolina taxpayers elect the reduced credit to simplify adjustments and preserve NOLs[cite: 3].
Case Study: Aerospace Component Innovation in Charleston
[cite_start]
Consider Coastal Propulsion Systems (CPS) in Charleston[cite: 3].
Scenario A: The New Business Component (Project “Vortex”)
CPS designated a “Composite Hub” as a new business component. [cite_start]They faced design uncertainty regarding resin strength and conducted thermal cycling tests[cite: 3].
Scenario B: The Existing Business Component (Project “Efficiency+”)
CPS improved an existing titanium blade’s aerodynamic profile. [cite_start]They utilized wind-tunnel testing and faced method uncertainty regarding casting[cite: 3].
Inter-Departmental Guidance: Interplay with Other Incentives
[cite_start]
The state’s tax code provides several overlapping incentives[cite: 3].
Property Tax Exemptions for R&D Facilities
[cite_start]
SC Code Section 12-37-220(B)(34) provides a five-year exemption from county property taxes for facilities dedicated to R&D[cite: 3].
The Job Tax Credit for R&D Establishments
R&D facilities qualify for the Job Tax Credit. [cite_start]Taxpayers creating ten new jobs can earn annual credits ranging from $1,500 to $25,000 per job[cite: 3].
The Headquarters Credit
[cite_start]
Establishing a corporate headquarters with an R&D unit may qualify for a 20% offset for real and personal property costs[cite: 3].
Documentation Standards and Audit Readiness
The SCDOR strictly construes statutes against the taxpayer during audits. [cite_start]Contemporaneous records must link technical uncertainties to a process of experimentation[cite: 3].
Strategic Implications of Conformity and the 50% Cap
Because the credit is non-incremental, businesses with stable R&D spending generate substantial credits annually. [cite_start]However, the 50% liability cap often necessitates a carryforward strategy[cite: 3].
Final Thoughts
The South Carolina R&D tax credit provides a robust incentive for technological advancement. [cite_start]Success requires scientific brilliance and a commitment to documenting the experimentation process that turns uncertainty into a functional business component[cite: 3].
