Prior Law R&D Credit (Subchapter O Carryforward)

[cite_start]

Subchapter O carryforwards are unused research and development tax credits established under the Texas franchise tax prior to January 1, 2008, which remain eligible to offset current liability. These legacy credits are preserved by legislative transition rules but are subject to a final expiration date of December 31, 2027. [cite: 3]

The landscape of Texas franchise tax incentives is a complex tapestry of historical provisions and modern imperatives, with the Prior Law Research and Development (R&D) credit—governed by the now-repealed Subchapter O of Chapter 171—serving as a critical link between the state’s legacy tax systems and its current innovation-driven policy. [cite_start]To understand the Subchapter O carryforward is to understand the fundamental shift in Texas corporate taxation that occurred during the 79th Legislature’s Third Called Session in 2006. [cite: 3] Before this transition, the Texas franchise tax was calculated based on a combination of taxable capital and earned surplus. Subchapter O provided a robust credit against this version of the tax for businesses conducting qualified research in the state. When the legislature moved to replace the historical franchise tax with the modern “margin tax” model effective January 1, 2008, it faced a dilemma regarding the billions of dollars in earned but unutilized tax credits held by major innovators in the aerospace, semiconductor, and petrochemical sectors. [cite_start]The resulting legislative solution was the preservation of these credits as carryforwards, a decision that has created a persistent administrative and compliance requirement for the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and corporate tax departments alike for nearly two decades. [cite: 3]

The Genesis of Subchapter O and the Preservation of Legacy Credits

The original R&D credit, codified in Chapter 171, Subchapter O of the Texas Tax Code, was designed as a direct incentive to foster high-tech employment and capital investment. [cite_start]Under this regime, the credit was often earned in annual increments and, if not fully utilized to offset tax due, could be carried forward to subsequent years. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The legislative mechanism for preserving these credits during the 2008 overhaul was Section 18(d) of House Bill 3, which explicitly stated that a taxable entity that established a credit under Subchapter O before its repeal could continue to claim the unused portion of that credit as a carryforward. [cite: 3] This preservation was not merely an act of administrative convenience but a legal recognition of the reliance interests of taxpayers who had made long-term capital investments in Texas based on the availability of these incentives.

The transition from Subchapter O to the margin tax was a pivotal moment in Texas tax history. [cite_start]The new margin tax, while broader in scope, initially lacked a corresponding R&D credit, creating a gap that was only partially filled by the temporary business loss carryforward credit. [cite: 3] [cite_start]It was not until the enactment of Subchapter M in 2013 that a permanent R&D credit returned to the Texas Tax Code. [cite: 3] Consequently, for several years, the only R&D-specific incentive available to many legacy Texas employers was the Subchapter O carryforward. This created a bifurcated compliance environment where tax professionals had to maintain records for credits earned under a repealed law while calculating current tax liability under a completely different statutory framework.

Comparative Evolution of Texas R&D Credit Statutes

Statute Reference	Period of Credit Creation	Legal Basis for Carryforward	Final Expiration Date
Subchapter O	Prior to January 1, 2008	HB 3 (2006) Section 18(d)	December 31, 2027
Subchapter M	Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2025	TTC Section 171.659	20 Consecutive Reports
Subchapter T	January 1, 2026 – Present	SB 2206 (2025)	20 Consecutive Reports

The survival of Subchapter O carryforwards through multiple subsequent legislative sessions demonstrates the state’s commitment to tax stability. However, this stability comes with a hard deadline. [cite_start]Unlike modern carryforwards, which typically have a rolling 20-year lifespan, the Subchapter O credits are governed by a specific sunset provision. [cite: 3]

Local Revenue Office Guidance: The 2027 Expiration and Application Rules

The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts has issued extensive administrative guidance to manage the tail-end of the Subchapter O lifecycle. [cite_start]The most significant of these is Rule 3.593(e)(1), which establishes a final expiration date for any remaining Subchapter O R&D credit carryforward. [cite: 3] [cite_start]According to this rule, these credits will expire, at the latest, on December 31, 2027. [cite: 3] This hard sunset serves as a “clearing of the decks,” allowing the state to eventually move toward a tax environment where only modern credits—those aligned with current federal definitions—remain on the books.

[cite_start]

The expiration date is not merely a suggestion but a statutory barrier that prohibits the use of these credits on any report originally due after the deadline. [cite: 3] This has significant implications for long-term tax planning, especially for capital-intensive firms with multi-million dollar carryforward balances. If a taxpayer has a surplus of credits, they must prioritize the exhaustion of Subchapter O balances before utilizing more recent Subchapter M or Subchapter T credits. [cite_start]This prioritization is mandated by the Comptroller’s “ordering rules”. [cite: 3]

Mandatory Ordering of Credit Application

In the event that a taxable entity possesses multiple types of R&D credits, the Comptroller’s Tax Policy Division specifies a strict hierarchy for their application. [cite_start]This hierarchy is designed to ensure that credits with the earliest expiration dates are used first, thereby maximizing the potential benefit for the taxpayer while simplifying the state’s long-term liability ledger. [cite: 3] The required order is as follows:

[cite_start]
1. Subchapter O Carryforwards: These must be applied first due to their 2027 expiration date. [cite: 3]

[cite_start]

2. Subchapter M Carryforwards: These are applied second, following their 20-year rolling expiration. [cite: 3]

[cite_start]

3. Current Year Credits: These are applied last, as they have the longest remaining lifespan. [cite: 3]

This ordering reflects a pro-taxpayer policy stance by the Comptroller. [cite_start]By forcing the use of the oldest, most “at-risk” credits first, the state prevents a scenario where a taxpayer loses an earned benefit because they were required to use a newer credit first. [cite: 3] However, this ordering also requires meticulous tracking. [cite_start]Tax departments must maintain separate accounts for each vintage of credit to ensure compliance with this mandate. [cite: 3]

Administrative Verification and the Rule 3.599 Audit Paradox

One of the most complex aspects of Subchapter O carryforwards is the Comptroller’s authority to audit the original expenditures that created the credit, even decades after the fact. Under 34 Texas Administrative Code § 3.599, the Comptroller is authorized to verify that a credit establishing a carryforward was based on “qualified research activities”. This creates what tax professionals often refer to as the “closed-year audit paradox.”

Auditing Outside the Statute of Limitations

Generally, the statute of limitations for the Texas franchise tax is four years. However, Rule 3.599(g)(5) explicitly allows the Comptroller to verify Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) from a year that is technically closed by the statute of limitations, solely for the purpose of verifying a carryforward available in an open period. This means that a Comptroller auditor in 2025 can legally demand documentation for research conducted in 2006 or 2007 if those years generated a carryforward that the taxpayer is still claiming on their current report.

The implications of this rule are profound:

• Documentation Retention: Taxpayers must maintain records (innovation logs, payroll data, project descriptions) for the original credit-earning years as long as the carryforward remains on their books.
• Carryforward Adjustments: If an audit determines that the 2006 research did not meet the definition of “qualified research,” the Comptroller can reduce the current carryforward balance.
• No Retroactive Assessment: Crucially, the Comptroller cannot adjust the tax, penalty, or interest for the 2006 report year itself if it is closed. The audit only impacts the “future” value of the credit as it appears on current and future returns.

The Bar Against “Creating” New Prior Law Credits

While the Comptroller can adjust an existing carryforward downward, the statute of limitations strictly prevents a taxpayer from adjusting it upward by “discovering” new credits in closed years. Tax Policy memorandum 202301007M clarifies that a taxpayer cannot amend a report for an out-of-statute period to create an R&D credit and an associated carryforward. The logic is that creating a credit is essentially a refund claim. If the year the expenditures were made is closed, the taxpayer is barred from “creating” a credit that did not previously exist. This reinforces the concept that Subchapter O carryforwards are a finite, legacy resource that cannot be expanded through retroactive accounting.

The 50% Limitation and the Ceiling on Tax Benefits

A fundamental constraint that applies to all R&D credits in Texas, including the Subchapter O carryforward, is the 50% limitation. [cite_start]Codified in Section 171.658, this rule states that the total credit claimed for a report—including the sum of all carryforwards and current-year credits—cannot exceed 50% of the amount of franchise tax due for that report before any other tax credits are applied. [cite: 1]

This limitation serves a dual purpose. For the state, it ensures that no single credit can eliminate a taxpayer’s entire franchise tax liability, thereby maintaining a minimum level of revenue from all taxable entities. For the taxpayer, it often forces the creation of further carryforwards. If a company owes $1 million in tax but has $700,000 in Subchapter O credits, it can only use $500,000 in the current year. [cite_start]The remaining $200,000 must be carried forward to the next year, subject to the 2027 expiration date. [cite: 3]

Strategic Impact of the 50% Cap

Metric	Calculation Basis	Regulatory Reference
Gross Tax Liability	Margin multiplied by applicable rate	TTC § 171.002
Maximum Credit Offset	50% of Gross Tax Liability	TTC § 171.658
Ordering Priority	Sub O > Sub M > Current Year	Rule 3.593
Carryforward Excess	Amount exceeding 50% cap	TTC § 171.659

For large corporations with significant R&D spend, the 50% cap often acts as a bottleneck. [cite_start]It is not uncommon for major aerospace or technology firms to have carryforward balances that would take a decade or more to exhaust given their current tax liabilities. [cite: 3] [cite_start]This makes the 2027 expiration of Subchapter O particularly high-stakes; if the 50% cap prevents a firm from using its old credits before 2027, those credits will simply disappear. [cite: 3]

Integration with Subchapter M and the SB 2206 Overhaul

The Texas R&D tax credit environment underwent another seismic shift in June 2025 with the signing of Senate Bill 2206 (SB 2206). This legislation, which takes effect January 1, 2026, replaces the Subchapter M credit with a new, permanent Subchapter T regime. While SB 2206 focuses on increasing credit rates and aligning with federal law, it explicitly preserves the treatment of existing carryforwards.

The Impact of SB 2206 on Carryforwards

Effective for reports due on or after January 1, 2026, SB 2206 makes several critical changes that interact with legacy carryforwards:

1. Rate Increases: The base credit rate increases from 5% to 8.722%, and the university-collaboration rate increases to 10.903%.
2. Refundability: In a major departure from prior law, the credit is now refundable for “small businesses” and “new veteran-owned businesses” that owe no franchise tax.
3. Sales Tax Repeal: The sales and use tax exemption for R&D equipment—previously an alternative to the franchise tax credit—is repealed effective January 1, 2026.

The repeal of the sales tax exemption is particularly relevant for holders of Subchapter O carryforwards. Historically, many companies chose the sales tax exemption because they already had a surplus of franchise tax carryforwards and didn’t want to add more to a pile they couldn’t exhaust due to the 50% cap. Without the sales tax option, these firms must now take the franchise tax credit, which will further swell their carryforward balances. This makes the “ordering rules” and the 2027 expiration even more critical, as the “competition” for the 50% cap space will increase significantly.

Technical Definitions: Qualified Research and Conformity

A recurring source of friction between taxpayers and the Comptroller is the definition of “Qualified Research Expenses” (QREs). Because Subchapter O credits were earned under an older version of the law, their verification is tied to historical standards.

The Shift from Fixed to Rolling Conformity

The Texas R&D credit has historically been “locked” to specific versions of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Subchapter M, for instance, was tied to the IRC as it existed on December 31, 2011. This “fixed-date conformity” meant that changes to federal law—such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017—did not automatically apply to the Texas credit unless the state legislature explicitly updated the code.

Subchapter O was tied to even older IRC definitions. However, the new Subchapter T (effective 2026) moves Texas to “rolling conformity”. [cite_start]Under SB 2206, the Texas credit is now directly linked to the amount reported on “Line 48 of federal Form 6765”. [cite: 1] This alignment streamlines compliance for current-year credits but does nothing to change the historical definitions that apply to the Subchapter O carryforwards. Auditors will still apply the standards in place when the credits were originally earned.

The Four-Part Test in the Texas Audit Context

For an expense to qualify for an R&D credit in Texas, it must generally meet the federal “Four-Part Test” outlined in IRC Section 41. When auditing Subchapter O carryforwards, the Comptroller looks for:

1. Section 174 Test: The activity must qualify as a research or experimental expenditure under IRC Section 174.
2. Technological in Nature: The research must rely on principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.
3. Business Component: The research must be intended to develop a new or improved product, process, software, or technique.
4. Process of Experimentation: Substantially all of the activities must constitute a process of experimentation involving the evaluation of alternatives to eliminate technical uncertainty.

If a taxpayer cannot prove these four points for 20-year-old projects, their Subchapter O carryforward is at risk. This is why contemporaneous documentation is the single most important factor in credit preservation.

Combined Reporting and the Unitary Business Principle

[cite_start]

Texas requires “combined reporting” for entities under common control and engaged in a “unitary business”. [cite: 1] This has significant implications for how Subchapter O carryforwards are utilized and tracked across a corporate family.

Credit Sharing within the Group

[cite_start]

Under Texas law, the “combined group” is the taxable entity for the purpose of the R&D credit. [cite: 1] This means that a carryforward earned by Member A in 2006 can be used to offset the tax liability of Member B in 2025, provided both are part of the same combined group report. This “sharing” of credits is one of the primary ways that large companies manage their carryforward balances and avoid the 50% cap bottleneck.

The Impact of Group Changes

When members join or leave a combined group, the carryforward rules become even more intricate. If a member leaves a group, it generally takes its “portion” of the credit carryforward with it. The group must then adjust its future reports to remove the carryforward associated with the departed member. Conversely, if a member joins a group and brings Subchapter O carryforwards with it, those credits are subject to the same 2027 expiration and 50% cap as the rest of the group’s incentives.

Tiered Partnerships and Ownership Interests

[cite_start]

For tiered partnership structures, the law allows an upper-tier entity to claim the credits of a lower-tier entity to the extent of its ownership interest. [cite: 1] This ensures that the R&D benefit flows up to the entity responsible for the tax report. [cite_start]However, it also requires that the upper-tier entity includes the revenue and expenses of the lower-tier entity in its taxable margin calculation. [cite: 1]

Reporting Requirements and the “Long Form” Mandate

Utilizing a Subchapter O carryforward requires meticulous reporting. The Comptroller’s office has established a specific suite of forms that must be filed annually to claim and support the credit.

Required Documentation for Credit Claims

To claim an R&D credit (including carryforwards) on a Texas franchise tax report, a taxpayer must file:

• Form 05-158 (Long Form): The credit cannot be claimed on the E-Z Computation (Form 05-169).
• Form 05-160 (Credits Summary Schedule): This form acts as a master ledger for all franchise tax credits.
• Form 05-178 (R&D Activities Credits Schedule): This is the detailed worksheet where the current-year credit is calculated and the carryforward from prior years is reported.

On Form 05-178, Item 13 is the specific field for reporting “R & D activities credit carried forward from prior years”. Taxpayers must enter their total available carryforward balance here. The form then adds this to any current-year credit (Item 12) to determine the “total credit available” (Item 14).

Common Reporting Errors and Their Consequences

The Comptroller is notoriously strict regarding the filing of these schedules. Common errors that can lead to a credit being denied or a report being rejected include:

• Missing Credits Summary: Filing Form 05-158 and claiming a credit on Line 32 without attaching the 05-160 schedule.
• Missing R&D Schedule: Claiming a credit on the 05-160 without the supporting 05-178.
• Incorrect Computation: Attempting to claim the credit while using the E-Z Computation method, which results in the automatic forfeiture of the credit for that report year.
• Public Information Report (PIR) Failures: Failure to file a PIR or OIR (Ownership Information Report) can result in the forfeiture of the right to transact business, which in turn can invalidate tax credit claims.

Comprehensive Example: The Subchapter O Exhaustion Scenario

To illustrate the technical application of these rules, consider the case of “Galactic Aerospace Systems” (GAS), a legacy Texas defense contractor. GAS has been operating in Texas since the 1980s and accumulated significant R&D credits under Subchapter O.

GAS Financial Data for the 2025 Report Year

• Annualized Total Revenue: $50,000,000.
• Texas Apportioned Margin: $30,000,000.
• Franchise Tax Due (at 0.75% rate): $225,000.
• Subchapter O Carryforward (Vintage 2006): $150,000.
• Subchapter M Carryforward (Vintage 2020): $100,000.
• Current Year (2025) Subchapter M Credit: $50,000.

Step 1: Calculate the Credit Limitation

[cite_start]

Under TTC § 171.658, the total credit claimed cannot exceed 50% of the tax due before other credits. [cite: 1]

Limit = $225,000 * 0.50 = $112,500

Step 2: Apply Ordering Rules

[cite_start]

GAS must apply its credits in the order specified by Rule 3.593. [cite: 3]

Priority 1: Subchapter O Carryforward
GAS has $150,000 in Subchapter O credits. However, it can only use $112,500 due to the 50% cap.

• Applied Subchapter O: $112,500.
• Remaining Subchapter O (to be carried to 2026): $37,500 ($150,000 – $112,500).

Priority 2: Subchapter M Carryforward
Since the 50% cap was already reached by the Subchapter O credits, no Subchapter M carryforward can be used in 2025.

• Remaining Subchapter M Carryforward (to be carried to 2026): $100,000.

Priority 3: Current Year Credit
Similarly, the current year credit is deferred.

• Current Year Credit (to be carried to 2026): $50,000.

GAS Credit Status Table for 2025

Credit Type	Beginning Balance	Amount Applied	Ending Carryforward
Subchapter O (Exp. 2027)	$150,000	$112,500	$37,500
Subchapter M (Exp. 2040)	$100,000	$0	$100,000
Subchapter M (Current)	$50,000	$0	$50,000
Total Credits	$300,000	$112,500	$187,500

Step 3: Assessing the 2027 Risk

[cite_start]

GAS now realizes it has only two report years (2026 and 2027) to use its remaining $37,500 in Subchapter O credits before they expire. [cite: 3] [cite_start]If its tax liability remains steady, it will easily exhaust these in 2026. However, if GAS were to merge or experience a significant revenue drop, those $37,500 in credits could be lost forever. [cite: 3]

Strategic Considerations for the Final Years of Subchapter O

As the 2027 sunset approaches, corporate tax departments must engage in proactive “credit hygiene.” This involves auditing their own historical records to ensure that the Subchapter O balances they are carrying forward are robust enough to withstand a Comptroller inquiry.

The Impact of Agency Deference Changes (SB 14)

A new and potentially significant variable in this analysis is Senate Bill 14, passed in the 2025 session. This law eliminates the requirement that Texas courts give deference to a state agency’s (such as the Comptroller’s) legal determination regarding the construction or validity of a law or rule. Historically, the Comptroller’s interpretation of what constitutes “qualified research” was given significant weight in court. With the elimination of agency deference, taxpayers may have a stronger hand in challenging the Comptroller’s audit adjustments to carryforward balances. This makes the 2025–2027 period a high-stakes era for R&D tax litigation in Texas.

Corporate Transaction Planning

For companies involved in mergers and acquisitions, the Subchapter O carryforward is a “volatile asset.” Because it cannot be transferred except with substantially all the assets of a business, and because it has a hard expiration date, its value in a transaction must be heavily discounted. Buyers must conduct rigorous due diligence to ensure the target company has the documentation required by Rule 3.599 to defend the legacy credit.

Final Thoughts

The Subchapter O carryforward represents a unique era of Texas tax policy, a time when the state first began its aggressive push into the high-technology economy. While the statute that created these credits is long gone, the credits themselves remain a vital—if finite—resource for the state’s largest employers. The context of the Prior Law R&D credit is now defined by its interaction with the modern Subchapter M and Subchapter T regimes, the mandatory ordering of application, and the looming 2027 expiration.

The guidance from the Texas Comptroller’s office serves as a roadmap for these final years. By understanding the 50% limitation, the Rule 3.599 audit risks, and the reporting requirements on Form 05-178, tax professionals can ensure they extract the maximum possible value from these historical incentives. As the state moves toward a permanent, federally-aligned R&D credit framework in 2026, the successful management of Subchapter O carryforwards remains the final bridge to a more modern and streamlined Texas franchise tax environment. Taxpayers who fail to prioritize these credits in the next three report cycles will see a significant loss of capital, marking an unceremonious end to one of the state’s most impactful economic development tools. In contrast, those who navigate the compliance requirements effectively will ensure that their historical investments in Texas innovation continue to pay dividends until the final sunset of the prior law in 2027.