Arizona Innovation at a Crossroads: Strategic Reform of the Research and Development Refundable Tax Credit to Solidify the Silicon Desert

Executive Summary

The state of Arizona has successfully positioned itself as a premier global destination for high-technology investment, earning the moniker “Silicon Desert” through decades of strategic policy cultivation. At the heart of this economic transformation is the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit framework, a critical fiscal instrument designed to incentivize private sector innovation. While the nonrefundable portion of the credit provides significant benefits to established, profitable corporations, the refundable component was specifically engineered to serve as a lifeline for small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) and early-stage startups that have not yet achieved tax liability.

Despite the recent and laudable legislative action to increase the statewide aggregate cap for refundable credits from $5 million to $10 million, the program remains functionally impaired by a structural oversubscription crisis. Under current administrative rules, the entire $10 million allocation is frequently exhausted on the first business day of the calendar year through a “random selection” process that introduces unacceptable levels of market uncertainty. For the high-growth startups that drive Arizona’s technological edge, the current “lottery” system transforms a vital capital-planning tool into a game of chance.

This whitepaper provides a comprehensive analysis of the Arizona R&D tax credit landscape, focusing on the mechanics of the refundable cap exhaustion. It identifies the systemic flaws in the “first-come, first-served” and “randomized” allocation models and proposes two robust, pro-growth solutions: the adoption of a pro-rata distribution model and a multi-tranche lifecycle stratification system. By implementing these reforms, the Arizona Legislature can ensure that innovation incentives are distributed equitably, protecting the state’s venture capital ecosystem while maintaining rigorous oversight to prevent fraud and wastage. The following analysis demonstrates that while the initial fiscal outlay is measurable, the long-term economic return through job creation, increased tax base, and technological leadership ensures the program is self-funding over its lifecycle.

The Architecture of Arizona’s Innovation Incentives: A Statutory Overview

To understand the current policy crisis regarding cap exhaustion, one must first examine the statutory foundations of the R&D tax credit within the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). The credit is not a monolithic incentive but rather a sophisticated, multi-layered framework bifurcated between the Department of Revenue (ADOR) and the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA).

Foundational Statutes for Corporations and Individuals

The primary authority for the Arizona R&D tax credit is established under A.R.S. § 43-1168 for corporate taxpayers and A.R.S. § 43-1074.01 for individual taxpayers, including those receiving pass-through income from S-corporations and partnerships.¹ Arizona largely aligns its definition of “qualified research” with the federal standard found in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 41, requiring that activities satisfy the “Four-Part Test” to be eligible for state-level incentives.³

The Arizona credit is designed to reward increased research activity, meaning it is calculated based on the excess of qualified research expenses (QREs) over a historical base amount.⁶ For a research activity to qualify, it must be conducted entirely within the state of Arizona.³ This geographic restriction ensures that the tax expenditure directly supports local employment and infrastructure rather than subsidizing out-of-state operations.

Credit Calculation Methods and Tiered Rates

Taxpayers in Arizona currently have the flexibility to choose between two primary calculation methods: the Regular Research Credit method and the recently introduced Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method.⁸ The introduction of the ASC method in 2023 represents a significant modernization of the code, allowing businesses with fluctuating research budgets—common in the startup ecosystem—to claim credits without the prohibitive burden of reconstructing decades-old base period data.⁶

The credit utilizes a tiered rate structure intended to provide a heavy incentive for the first several million dollars of innovation spending, which disproportionately benefits SMBs.

Table 1: Arizona R&D Credit Tiered Rates

Source: 2

Under this structure, a mid-sized firm with $5,000,000 in qualifying Arizona-based R&D spend would generate a total credit of $975,000.¹¹ This represents one of the most competitive R&D credit rates in the United States, positioning Arizona as a formidable rival to other technology hubs.⁶

The Role of the University Research Credit

In addition to the general R&D credit, Arizona incentivizes collaboration between the private sector and the state’s higher education system. Under A.R.S. § 43-1168(A)(1)(d), taxpayers can claim an additional 10% nonrefundable credit for basic research payments made to universities under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Board of Regents (ASU, UArizona, and NAU).³ This university-specific credit is subject to its own $10 million annual aggregate cap, which is administered by ADOR and requires separate certification from the ACA.³ This synergy between industry and academia is a primary driver of the $59 billion in economic impact generated by university-health partnerships in the state.¹⁵

The Mechanics of Refundability for Small and Medium Businesses

The most transformative aspect of Arizona’s R&D policy for the startup community is the refundable component, established in 2010 through Senate Bill 1254 and codified under A.R.S. § 41-1507.¹³ For a profitable corporation, a tax credit is simply a reduction in liability. However, for a high-growth startup that is reinvesting every dollar of revenue into technical talent and prototypes, a nonrefundable credit that must be carried forward for 10 or 15 years provides zero immediate utility.¹⁰

Eligibility and the “75% Rule”

To unlock the refundable portion of the credit, a taxpayer must meet specific “small business” criteria. The firm must employ fewer than 150 full-time employees worldwide as of the last day of the taxable year.² If the company qualifies, it may elect to receive a partial refund of its excess credit—defined as the portion of the credit that exceeds its current-year tax liability.¹⁶

The refund is subject to a statutory “haircut” intended to balance the benefit of liquidity against the cost to the state’s general fund. Taxpayers receive 75% of the excess credit as a cash refund, while the remaining 25% is irrevocably waived and forfeited.² Furthermore, the maximum refund available to any single taxpayer in a single tax year is capped at $100,000.¹⁴

The Critical Pre-Approval Process

The administrative gateway to this liquidity is the Arizona Commerce Authority. Before a company can claim the refund on its tax return with ADOR, it must first apply to the ACA and receive a “Certificate of Qualification”.¹⁰ This certification process is not merely a formality; it is a rigorous verification of the firm’s eligibility, employee count, and compliance with state sanctions.¹⁶ Failure to receive this certificate prior to filing an original tax return results in permanent and irrevocable disqualification from the refundable program for that tax year.¹⁰

Defining the Policy Issue: The Crisis of Cap Exhaustion

While the statutory framework for the R&D credit is robust, its practical application is currently undermined by the exhaustion of the statewide aggregate cap. Until recently, the cap was set at $5 million annually.⁶ Recognizing the massive demand, the Arizona Legislature, through SB 1562, increased this cap to $10 million.²⁰ However, even with this doubling of funds, the program remains functionally inaccessible to a large percentage of the very SMBs it was designed to support.

The “Day One” Phenomenon and the Lottery System

The ACA opens the application window for the calendar year cap on the first business day of January at 8:00 a.m..¹⁸ Because the demand for cash refunds among Arizona’s 1,400+ life science firms and 10,000+ technology firms far exceeds $10 million, the cap is typically reached almost instantly.¹⁶

To manage the overwhelming volume of simultaneous applications, the ACA has moved away from a strictly chronological “first-come” basis. Instead, all “substantially complete” applications received by 11:59 p.m. on that first business day are grouped together and prioritized via a random selection process.¹⁶ If a company’s application is not among those randomly selected before the $10 million is exhausted, they receive nothing.¹⁶

Negative Consequences of the Current Allocation Model

The randomized lottery system creates a host of unintended negative consequences that threaten the stability of Arizona’s innovation ecosystem:

• Capital Planning Paralysis: For a startup, $100,000 in cash can represent three to four months of runway for a specialized engineer. When this funding is tied to a lottery, CEOs cannot include it in their financial projections, significantly reducing the incentive’s power to influence hiring and investment decisions.¹⁴
• Inequity for Fiscal-Year Filers: Companies with fiscal years ending mid-year (e.g., June 30) often find the cap entirely depleted by the time they have finalized their research spending data and are ready to apply. While they can wait until the following January to apply for the next year’s cap, this delay in liquidity can be fatal for cash-strapped startups.¹⁸
• The “All or Nothing” Risk: If a firm applies for the refund and is rejected due to cap exhaustion, the portion of the credit they attempted to refund is “irrevocably waived.” They cannot even carry it forward as a nonrefundable credit to future years.¹⁴ This creates a high-stakes gambling environment that punishes conservative financial management.
• Administrative Waste: Hundreds of firms spend thousands of dollars on specialized tax consultants to prepare “day one” applications, only to have those efforts rendered moot by a random number generator.¹¹

Comparative Analysis: How Peer States Manage R&D Caps

Arizona is in a global competition for talent and capital. As other states recognize the volatility of “first-come” models, they have moved toward more equitable distribution systems.

Table 2: State Refundable Cap Allocation Methods

Source: 26

The emerging national standard for high-performance innovation states is the pro-rata distribution model. By ensuring that every qualified applicant receives a portion of the fund, these states eliminate the “lottery risk” that currently plagues the Arizona program.

Proposed Solution 1: Transition to a Pro-Rata Allocation Model

The most direct and effective solution to the “Day One” lottery problem is for the Arizona Legislature to mandate a pro-rata distribution of the $10 million refundable cap.

The Mechanism of Action

Under a pro-rata model, the Arizona Commerce Authority would move from a daily application window to an annual or quarterly window. All “substantially complete” applications received during the window would be aggregated. If the total qualified refund requests exceed the $10 million cap, every applicant’s award would be reduced by an equal percentage.

For example, if the ACA receives $20 million in qualified refund requests for the $10 million pool, the “payout ratio” would be 50%. A company that qualified for the maximum $100,000 refund would receive $50,000.²⁶

Strategic Benefits for SMBs and the State

• Guaranteed Liquidity: Every eligible small business that performs qualified R&D in Arizona receives a benefit. While the amount might be smaller than $100,000 in high-demand years, the certainty of receiving funds allows for accurate financial planning and hiring.¹⁴
• Market Signaling: A pro-rata system tells the venture capital community that Arizona is a rational and predictable market for investment. It removes the perception that the state’s primary innovation incentive is a “lottery.”
• Fairness Across Tax Years: This model eliminates the “Day One” rush and provides a level playing field for fiscal-year filers who currently struggle to access funds.¹⁸

Proposed Solution 2: Implementation of a Lifecycle Stratification (Tiered Cap) System

A second practical solution is to segment the $10 million cap into specific tranches based on the maturity and size of the SMB. This prevents more established mid-sized firms (those nearing the 150-employee limit) from consuming the entire pool at the expense of true early-stage startups.

The Proposed Tranche Structure

The Legislature could divide the $10 million cap into three distinct pools:

Table 3: Proposed Tranche Stratification for the $10M Cap

Implementation and Flexibility

This tiered approach allows the state to prioritize specific economic development goals. For instance, if the state wishes to aggressively pursue semiconductor supply chain companies, it can adjust the “Strategic Sector” tranche accordingly.³³ If a tranche is not fully utilized by a certain date (e.g., September 1), the remaining funds could roll over into the general pool for pro-rata distribution to other applicants.

Implementation Roadmap: Benefiting SMBs While Preventing Fraud

Any expansion or reform of tax incentives must be balanced with rigorous safeguards to protect the public purse from wastage and fraudulent claims. The transition to a more accessible refundable credit must be paired with modernized oversight.

Strengthening Documentation and Audit Protocols

To ensure that only genuine research is subsidized, the ACA and ADOR should adopt the following “Best Practice” audit standards used by the IRS and peer states:

• Contemporaneous Record Requirements: Taxpayers must be required to provide project-level documentation, including lab notes, time-tracking logs, and payroll records, that were created at the time the research was performed.¹¹
• Specialized Technical Review: The 1% processing fee currently paid by applicants should be earmarked to hire technical experts (engineers and scientists) within the ACA to review the “scientific uncertainty” of claimed projects, rather than relying solely on tax accountants.¹⁸
• Third-Party Certification for Large Claims: For any refund request exceeding $50,000, the state should require a “Study of Record” signed by a qualified R&D tax professional or CPA, shifting the burden of initial due diligence to the private sector.²⁵

Leveraging Technology for Compliance

The state should implement a centralized, blockchain-ready or secure digital portal for R&D claims. This would allow for:

• Real-time Cap Tracking: SMBs could see exactly how much of the cap remains, reducing the “blind lottery” effect.
• Cross-Matching Data: Automatically comparing payroll data from the Department of Economic Security (DES) with R&D wage claims to prevent the “double-counting” of employees or the claiming of non-existent staff.³⁶
• E-Verify Integration: Maintaining strict adherence to A.R.S. § 23-214(B) to ensure that only companies with a legal workforce receive state subsidies.¹⁶

Cost Analysis and the Self-Funding Innovation Cycle

A primary concern for the Legislature is the fiscal impact of the $10 million tax expenditure. However, framing this as a “cost” is economically inaccurate. When viewed as an investment in a high-multiplier sector, the R&D credit is a revenue generator for the state.

The Innovation Multiplier Effect

The technology sector in Arizona does not exist in a vacuum. It acts as a “base sector” that imports capital and exports high-value goods, creating a massive ripple effect through the local economy.

Table 4: Economic Multipliers for Arizona Technology Sector

This means that for every $1 million in R&D refunds provided to SMBs, $1.88 million in total economic output is generated within Arizona.²⁹ More importantly, for every 100 high-wage R&D jobs protected or created by this liquidity, an additional 276 jobs are supported in other industries (construction, services, retail).²²

Future Benefits and Fiscal Payout

The initial $10 million outlay pays for itself through three primary channels:

• Direct Payroll Taxes: The average annual wage for a tech worker in Arizona is $75,600, with specialized roles in semiconductors and software exceeding $126,000 to $160,000.³⁴ These high wages generate significant individual income tax receipts that flow directly into the General Fund.
• Commercialization and Corporate Tax Base: SMBs that successfully develop products in Arizona tend to manufacture them in Arizona. As these firms grow out of the “small business” (150 employee) status, they become major corporate taxpayers.²³
• Attraction of Federal Grants: Many federal programs, such as SBIR/STTR and the CHIPS Act, require or prioritize projects with state-level matching or support. Arizona’s R&D credit acts as “seed capital” that allows local firms to win billions in federal contracts.²²

The Importance of Reform and the Consequences of Inaction

The decision to reform the R&D refundable cap is not merely about tax policy; it is about the future trajectory of the Arizona economy.

The Stakes of Policy Stagnation

If Arizona maintains the current “lottery” system, several negative trends will accelerate:

• Venture Capital Flight: Investors seek predictable environments. If a startup’s cash flow depends on a random selection process, VCs will encourage their portfolio companies to relocate to states like Michigan or Iowa, where R&D refunds are distributed via a stable pro-rata model.²³
• Talent Brain Drain: Arizona’s university system (ASU, UArizona, NAU) produces thousands of world-class engineers every year.¹⁵ Without a stable ecosystem of SMBs to employ them, these graduates will take their talents to California or Texas, where early-stage support is more robust.
• Loss of the “Silicon Desert” Brand: Arizona’s reputation as a tech-friendly state is its greatest competitive advantage. A dysfunctional primary incentive for small businesses creates a “narrative of instability” that can deter future relocations.¹²

Positive Outcomes of Implementation

Conversely, by fixing the cap exhaustion issue, Arizona can realize a vision of sustained technological leadership:

• A “Virtuous Cycle” of Growth: Reliable early-stage support leads to successful commercialization, which leads to large-scale manufacturing and high-quality employment for all Arizonans.⁴⁰
• Resilient Supply Chains: By supporting the SMBs that provide components to giants like Intel and Amkor, Arizona secures its position as the global hub for the semiconductor industry.³³
• Economic Vitality Across Rural and Urban Hubs: While many tech firms are in the Phoenix and Tucson metros, the supply chains and “induced” jobs from a thriving tech sector support rural economies through increased state-wide spending and tax revenue.¹⁵

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Arizona Research and Development Tax Credit has been a spectacular success in attracting the world’s most advanced industries to the state. However, the program is currently suffering from its own popularity. The “Day One” exhaustion of the $10 million refundable cap, and the subsequent “lottery” for funds, has created a bottleneck that punishes the very small businesses and startups that are the vanguard of future growth.

To ensure that Arizona remains the premier destination for innovation, the following policy shifts are recommended to the Legislature and the Governor:

• Enact Pro-Rata Distribution: Replace the “random selection” lottery with a pro-rata model that ensures every qualified applicant receives a predictable benefit.
• Establish Multi-Tranche Funding: Protect early-stage “seed” companies by carving out a dedicated portion of the $10 million cap for firms with fewer than 25 employees.
• Modernize Fraud Prevention: Use a portion of application fees to fund specialized technical audits and implement a real-time digital compliance portal.
• Align with Strategic Goals: Use the R&D credit as a precision tool to support the CHIPS Act and Bioscience Roadmap objectives.

By taking these steps, Arizona will transition from a state that “rewards the fastest filers” to a state that “invests in the best ideas.” The fiscal cost of this program is an investment in the high-wage, high-productivity workforce that will define Arizona’s prosperity for the next fifty years.

Works Cited

1. 43-1168 – Credit for increased research activity, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azleg.gov/ars/43/01168.htm
2. Arizona R&D Tax Credit | AndreTaxCo, PLLC, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.andretaxco.com/arizona-rdcredits
3. Arizona Revised Statutes Title 43. Taxation of Income § 43-1168 – Codes – FindLaw, accessed March 16, 2026, https://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-43-taxation-of-income/az-rev-st-sect-43-1168/
4. Arizona Revised Statutes § 43-1168 (2024) – Credit for increased research activity, accessed March 16, 2026, https://law.justia.com/codes/arizona/title-43/section-43-1168/
5. The 2025 Guide to State R&D Tax Credits | TaxTaker, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.taxtaker.com/blog/the-2025-guide-to-state-r-d-tax-credits
6. Arizona R&D Tax Credits, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/arizona-r-d-tax-credits
7. Are R&D Tax Credits Available in Arizona? | See if You Qualify – KBKG, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.kbkg.com/research-tax-credit/arizona-rd-tax-credit
8. Phoenix R&D Tax Credits | Haynie & Company CPA Firm, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.hayniecpas.com/phoenix-arizona/phoenix-r-and-d-tax-credits/
9. 2025 Year-End Guide: Tax Credits, Incentives – CBIA, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.cbia.com/news/small-business/2025-year-end-guide-tax-credits-incentives/
10. Arizona Form 300 Instructions – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/arizona/glossary/arizona-form-300-corporate-compliance/
11. Arizona R&D Tax Credit: Everything You Need To Know – Boast, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/innovation-insights/arizona-rd-tax-credits
12. Trending in 2025: Forecasting Strengths and Challenges in Our Key Economic Sectors, accessed March 16, 2026, https://inbusinessphx.com/economy-trends/trending-in-2025-forecasting-strengths-and-challenges-in-our-key-economic-sectors
13. Arizona Incentives – Research and Development Tax Credit Program for Business in AZ, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/incentives/research-development-tax-credit/
14. ACA Certification Letter – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/arizona/glossary/arizona-rd-tax-credit-certification-letter/
15. A DECADE OF PARTNERSHIP – Banner Health & The University of Arizona Economic & Fiscal Impacts, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azregents.edu/sites/default/files/reports/U_of_A-Banner-A-Decade-of-Impacts-110725.pdf
16. Arizona Commerce Authority Rule Notice of Rule Making No. 24-04 …, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/media/qercajeo/aca-ruling-24-04-research-and-development-refundable-tax-credit-program.pdf
17. How to apply for Arizona’s refundable R&D tax credit | Baker Tilly, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.bakertilly.com/insights/new-cap-for-arizona-rd-refundable-credit
18. R&D Refundable Tax Credit – Arizona Commerce Authority, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/incentives/research-development-tax-credit/rd-refundable-tax-credit/
19. Sunny Skies and Cold, Hard Cash: Arizona’s Refundable R&D Tax Credit, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.acenaconsulting.com/blog/arizonacredit
20. 75% Refund Limitation and Arizona R&D Tax Credit – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/arizona/glossary/75-refund-limitation/
21. SB1562 – 561R – Senate Fact Sheet – Arizona Legislature, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/56leg/1R/summary/S.1562COM-APPROP.DOCX.htm
22. Here’s how much the Arizona tech sector is growing, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/news/heres-how-much-the-arizona-tech-sector-is-growing/
23. Government Affairs Initiatives for 2018 | AZBio, accessed March 16, 2026, https://s11759.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/AZBio-Government-Affairs-Policy-Inititatives-2018.pdf
24. R&D Developments, accessed March 16, 2026, https://wwwtest.sjsu.edu/taxinstitute/docs/RD_11-3-25.pdf
25. Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing an R&D Tax Credit Consultant – Boast, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/blog/rd/mistakes-to-avoid-when-choosing-an-rd-tax-credit-consultant
26. 6 States Just Changed Their R&D Tax Credit Rules: What Your Business Needs to Know, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/rd/6-states-just-changed-their-rd-tax-credit-rules-what-your-business-needs-to-know
27. State R&D Tax Credits: Recent Updates and Impacts – Aprio, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aprio.com/insights-events/state-rd-tax-credits-recent-updates-and-impacts-ins-article-tax/
28. DRAFT Evaluation of the Research and Development Tax Credit – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed March 16, 2026, https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Fiscal/evaluationDB/Draft_Evaluation_of_the_Research_and_Development_Tax_Credit.pdf
29. Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) – New Mexico Legislature, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/08%20Regular/firs/SB0519.pdf
30. Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credits for Mesa, Arizona Businesses – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/arizona/case-studies/mesa/
31. Arizona Incentives – Qualified Facility Tax Credit Program for Businesses in AZ, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/incentives/qualified-facility-tax-credit/
32. Advancing the Biosciences and Improving Health Outcomes k · neurosciences · research and development · precision medicine – Flinn Foundation |, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.flinn.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/arizonas_bioscience_roadmap_2014-2025.compressed.pdf
33. The Silicon Desert Awakens: Arizona’s Semiconductor Rise – TRENDS Research & Advisory, accessed March 16, 2026, https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-silicon-desert-awakens-arizonas-semiconductor-rise/
34. Q3 2025 Arizona Technology Industry Impact Report Highlights Shifting Job Demand, Semiconductor Momentum and Workforce Investment, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/news/arizona-technology-council-q3-2025-industry-impact-report/
35. Understanding Arizona’s R&D Tax Credits: How to Maximize Your Savings, accessed March 16, 2026, https://taxpointadvisors.com/blog/view/understanding-arizonas-rd-tax-credits-how-to-maximize-your-savings
36. How to Handle an R&D Tax Credit Audit – FI Group, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.fi-group.us/how-to-handle-an-rd-tax-credit-audit
37. Research Credit Claims Audit Techniques Guide (RCCATG): Credit for increasing research activities Section 41* | Internal Revenue Service – IRS.gov, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.irs.gov/businesses/research-credit-claims-audit-techniques-guide-rccatg-credit-for-increasing-research-activities-section-41
38. Audit-Proofing Your Tax Credit Claims: Best Practices and Red Flags for 2026 – HRlogics, accessed March 16, 2026, https://hrlogics.com/blog/audit-proofing-your-tax-credit-claims-best-practices-and-red-flags-for-2026
39. Economic, Environmental, and Social Impacts of Data Centers in the United States – Phoenix, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.phoenix.gov/content/dam/phoenix/pddsite/documents/staffreports/z-ta-2-25-data-centers-combine-correspondence.pdf
40. FY 2025 TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH INITIATIVE FUND REPORT – | Arizona Board of Regents, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azregents.edu/sites/default/files/reports/2025-Technology-Research-Initiative-Fund-Annual-Report-R1.pdf
41. Tech Parks Arizona Drives $2.6 Billion Annual Economic Impact, accessed March 16, 2026, https://techparks.arizona.edu/press-release/tech-parks-arizona-drives-2-6-billion-annual-economic-impact/
42. Shaping Innovation Policy: Highlights from Arizona Technology Council’s 2025 DC Fly-In, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/shaping-innovation-policy-highlights-from-arizona-technology-councils-2025-dc-fly-in/
43. Government Affairs Initiatives for 2017 | AZBio, accessed March 16, 2026, https://s11759.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/AZBio-Government-Affairs-Policy-Inititatives-2017.pdf
44. ASU boosts the economic vitality of Arizona, accessed March 16, 2026, https://news.asu.edu/20250124-local-national-and-global-affairs-asu-boosts-economic-vitality-arizona