The Case for Statutory Rate Permanence: Ensuring the Long-Term Competitiveness of Arizona’s Innovation Ecosystem for Small and Medium Businesses

Arizona’s emergence as a premier global destination for high-technology investment, research-intensive manufacturing, and biotechnological discovery is the result of a deliberate, decades-long policy strategy designed to foster a resilient, knowledge-based economy. Central to this strategy is the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit, a fiscal tool that has effectively lowered the cost of innovation for thousands of enterprises across the state. However, a critical structural vulnerability exists within the current statutory framework: the pre-programmed reduction of credit rates—commonly referred to as the statutory sunset—scheduled to take effect after December 31, 2030.¹ Under current law, the primary credit rate for the first tier of qualified research expenses is mandated to drop from 24% to 20%, while the secondary tier will fall from 15% to 11%.¹ This impending contraction of state support creates a climate of long-term investment uncertainty that disproportionately impacts small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs), which operate on thin margins and rely on these credits for critical liquidity.⁵

The Evolution and Architecture of Arizona’s Innovation Policy

To understand the gravity of the impending rate sunset, one must examine the historical trajectory of Arizona’s R&D tax credit and the legislative intent behind its various iterations. The program was first established in 1992 for corporate taxpayers and expanded in 1999 to include individual taxpayers and pass-through entities, reflecting the state’s recognition that innovation is not the exclusive domain of large multinational corporations.² Over the subsequent decades, the Arizona Legislature progressively enhanced these incentives to maintain a competitive edge against other technology hubs like California, Texas, and Massachusetts.⁸

The most significant enhancements occurred during the 2010 and 2011 legislative sessions. In response to the global financial crisis and the need to stimulate high-wage job creation, the state increased the tiered credit rates to their current world-class levels and introduced the refundable component for small businesses.⁷ These changes were not merely fiscal adjustments but were designed as a “first-mover” advantage to attract the burgeoning aerospace, semiconductor, and bioscience sectors to the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas.⁸

Table 1: Historical Trajectory of Arizona R&D Credit Rates

The current framework, as codified in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 43-1168 and § 43-1074.01, provides a tiered incentive structure that prioritizes the first $2.5 million of excess qualified research expenses (QREs). By offering a 24% rate on this initial tier, the state specifically targets the “sweet spot” of SMB innovation, where a quarter-million dollars in tax offsets can fundamentally alter a firm’s ability to hire additional engineering talent or invest in specialized laboratory equipment.¹

Technical Foundations of the Arizona R&D Credit Framework

The efficacy of the R&D tax credit is rooted in its alignment with federal standards under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 41, which provides a familiar and rigorous “Four-Part Test” for determining whether an activity qualifies for the incentive. This alignment simplifies compliance for Arizona firms while ensuring that the credit is only applied to genuine scientific and technological advancement rather than routine business improvements.¹¹

The Four-Part Test for Qualified Research

The first requirement is the “Permitted Purpose,” which dictates that the research must be directed toward the development of a new or improved business component, such as a product, process, software, formula, or technique.¹¹ This is followed by the “Elimination of Uncertainty,” requiring the taxpayer to demonstrate that they intended to discover information to eliminate technical uncertainty regarding the capability, method, or appropriateness of the design.¹¹

The third pillar is the “Process of Experimentation,” which mandates a systematic evaluation of alternatives, often through modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error testing.¹¹ Finally, the activity must be “Technological in Nature,” fundamentally relying on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.¹¹ By adhering to these federal standards, Arizona ensures that its fiscal resources are directed toward activities that generate high-value intellectual property and long-term economic growth.⁶

Eligible Expenditure Categories

Arizona’s definition of Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) primarily includes three categories of costs, provided the research is conducted physically within the state’s borders.¹

Table 2: Eligible Expenditure Categories

A unique and highly strategic component of the Arizona framework is the additional 10% nonrefundable credit for basic research payments made to a university under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR), such as Arizona State University, the University of Arizona, or Northern Arizona University.³ This provision creates a powerful incentive for corporate-academic collaboration, ensuring that the state’s higher education institutions remain central to the commercialization of new technologies.⁹

The 2030 Sunset: Assessing the Economic Impact of Rate Contraction

The primary policy issue facing the Arizona Legislature is the mandatory reduction of credit rates scheduled for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2030. While the date may seem distant, the “shadow” of the sunset is already influencing the strategic planning of R&D-heavy SMBs.¹ Innovation projects in sectors like biotechnology, aerospace, and semiconductor design often operate on ten-to-fifteen-year development cycles.¹ A firm considering a major capital investment in 2026 must model its return on investment (ROI) based on a tax environment that will become significantly less supportive halfway through the project’s life.¹

Quantitative Analysis of the Rate Reduction

The shift from 24% to 20% for the Tier 1 credit represents a 16.67% reduction in the total value of the incentive for the most vulnerable businesses.² For Tier 2 expenses (those exceeding $2.5 million), the drop from 15% to 11% represents a staggering 26.67% reduction in state support.²

Table 3: Quantitative Analysis of the Rate Reduction

For an SMB with a $5 million research budget, the sunsetting of rates results in an annual loss of $200,000 in liquidity.⁶ In the context of early-stage technology firms, this is not merely a bookkeeping change; it is the equivalent of two to three high-wage engineering positions or the cost of a specialized clean-room facility lease.¹⁷ The reduction in the Tier 1 fixed-base credit from $600,000 to $500,000 further compounds the impact on mid-sized firms that have transitioned from pure R&D into the early phases of commercial production.²

The Qualitative Risk of Investment Paralysis

Beyond the direct financial loss, the existence of a pre-programmed sunset date introduces “policy risk” into the investment equation. Institutional investors and venture capital firms prioritize stability and predictability when allocating funds to regional hubs.⁸ If Arizona’s commitment to its signature incentive program is perceived as transient, capital will naturally flow to jurisdictions that offer permanent, reliable support.¹⁰ This is particularly critical for “first-mover” industries like autonomous vehicle (AV) testing and semiconductor fabrication, where the infrastructure and talent requirements are so high that firms cannot easily relocate once committed.⁸ However, the sunsetting of rates may discourage the next wave of entrants from selecting Arizona in the first place, leading to a gradual stagnation of the ecosystem.¹⁹

The SMB Challenge: Refundability and the Capital Bottleneck

Small and medium businesses face a unique set of challenges within the R&D framework that make them particularly sensitive to rate fluctuations. For many startups, the primary hurdle is not just the rate of the credit, but the ability to access that value before the company reaches sustained profitability.² Arizona’s refundable R&D credit was designed to solve this “liquidity gap” for firms with fewer than 150 employees.²

Mechanics of the Refundable Credit

Under A.R.S. § 41-1507, eligible SMBs may apply to the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) for a partial refund of their current year’s excess R&D credit.² The refund is limited to 75% of the excess credit, with the remaining 25% being forfeited by the taxpayer.² Furthermore, there is a $100,000 annual cap per taxpayer and a $5 million cumulative statewide cap, which is administered on a first-come, first-served basis.²

The demand for this program consistently exceeds the available funds. In the 2022 tax year, taxpayers requested over $6.7 million in refund applications, well above the $5 million legislative cap.¹¹ This oversubscription means that many qualified SMBs are left with “stranded” credits that they can only carry forward for 10 to 15 years, a duration that may exceed the lifespan of a venture-backed startup if it cannot secure early-stage liquidity.¹

The Dual Contraction Effect on SMBs

The post-2030 sunset creates a “dual contraction” for small businesses. First, the base credit amount decreases as the Tier 1 rate drops from 24% to 20%.¹ Second, because the refundable amount is a percentage of that base credit, the maximum potential cash infusion for an SMB also shrinks.²

Table 4: The Dual Contraction Effect on SMBs

For companies that are already struggling to secure capital in a high-interest-rate environment, this three-percentage-point hit to their effective research margin can be the difference between completing a clinical trial or shelving a promising new therapy.⁶

Comparative Analysis of State Innovation Incentives

Arizona does not operate in a vacuum. The competition for R&D investment is a “zero-sum” game played across fifty states and numerous global jurisdictions.²¹ To evaluate the risk of the 2030 sunset, it is necessary to compare Arizona’s trajectory with its primary competitors.

California: The Strategic Modernization

California, Arizona’s most direct rival for technology talent, has recently moved in the opposite direction of sunsetting. With the enactment of Senate Bill 711, California adopted the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) method and made its R&D carryforwards indefinite, replacing the previous 15-year limit.²⁵ While California’s rates (15% for the traditional method) are lower than Arizona’s 24%, the removal of expiration dates provides a level of structural permanence that Arizona’s sunsetting system lacks.²⁵

Texas and Michigan: Aggressive Expansion

Texas has recently increased its R&D credit rates to 8.722% for certain activities and offers an enhanced rate for research conducted with Texas higher education institutions.²⁶ Michigan, which previously had no R&D credit, introduced a new refundable credit starting in 2025 with a $100 million statewide cap, specifically targeting SMBs with fewer than 250 employees.²⁶

Table 5: Summary of Regional R&D Competitiveness

The data indicates that while Arizona currently offers the highest headline rate, it is the only state in the top innovation tier that is planning a retreat from its current level of support.²¹ This creates a “competitive window” for other states to recruit Arizona-based firms by highlighting the long-term reliability of their own tax codes.¹⁹

Proposed Solution 1: Permanent Rate Stabilization and Legislative Decoupling

The most effective way to eliminate investment uncertainty is the immediate and permanent repeal of the sunset provisions contained in A.R.S. § 43-1168 and § 43-1074.01. By striking the post-2030 reduction language, the Arizona Legislature would send a powerful signal to the global markets that the state’s commitment to innovation is foundational rather than cyclical.¹

Structural Reform of the Refundable Cap

As part of this stabilization, the legislature should also address the “bottleneck” in the refundable credit. Increasing the statewide cumulative refund limit from $5 million to $15 million would bring the program into alignment with current demand and allow for the continued growth of the SMB sector.¹⁰ Data from the 2022 tax year shows that demand for refunds is already nearly 35% higher than the cap.¹¹ Expanding the cap ensures that the “first-come, first-served” administration does not degenerate into a random lottery that discourages participation among the most innovative startups.²

Decoupling R&D from General Tax Cycles

To prevent the R&D credit from being used as a bargaining chip in annual budget negotiations, the state should consider a “Legislative Decoupling” strategy. By establishing the 24% and 15% rates as permanent infrastructure—similar to how the state treats highway funding or university land grants—Arizona can protect the R&D ecosystem from the volatility of political cycles.⁹ This permanence is the primary request of industry advocacy groups like the Arizona Technology Council and AZBio, who argue that “innovation does not follow a legislative calendar”.¹⁰

Proposed Solution 2: The “Rolling Sunset” and Performance-Linked Indexing

If a permanent repeal is not politically feasible, the legislature should adopt a “Rolling Sunset” model. This approach avoids the “investment cliff” by ensuring that the sunset date is always at least ten years in the future.³⁴

The 10-Year Rolling Horizon

Under this model, each successful legislative session would extend the sunset by one additional year. For example, in 2026, the sunset would be moved to 2036; in 2027, to 2037.³⁴ This ensures that any business starting a ten-year research project has a guarantee of rate stability through the entire project lifecycle.⁵ This model has been successfully applied to other long-term investment incentives at both the state and federal levels, such as the Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) program, which utilized a rolling gain deferral period to encourage patient capital.³⁵

Performance-Linked Indexing

To maintain fiscal accountability, the rolling extension could be made contingent upon an independent economic audit performed by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) or an external research firm.³⁷ If the R&D program continues to meet specific performance metrics—such as a target ROI, high-wage job creation thresholds, or a minimum GSP contribution—the sunset would automatically roll forward.¹⁴

Table 6: Performance-Linked Indexing

This “results-oriented” approach addresses concerns about fiscal waste while providing the long-term certainty required by the private sector.⁹

Implementation and the Prevention of Fraud and Wastage

The expansion or stabilization of high-value tax credits must be balanced by rigorous administrative oversight to prevent the “leakage” of state funds into non-qualified activities. Arizona already possesses a sophisticated administrative architecture for the R&D credit, which can be further enhanced to support the proposed policy changes.²

Automated Fraud Investigation Services

The Arizona Department of Revenue (ADOR) has a legislative mandate to utilize automated private fraud investigation software.⁴⁴ This system screens refund requests in real-time for red flags, such as fraudulent W-2 forms, identity theft, or the use of fictitious social security numbers.⁴⁴ For the R&D credit, this system should be upgraded to include “industry-specific” flagging criteria developed by the ADOR Criminal Investigations Unit.⁴⁴ If an SMB in a traditionally low-tech sector suddenly claims a maximum R&D refund, the system can automatically flag the return for a secondary manual review by a technical auditor.⁴⁴

The ACA Certification Gate

The Arizona Commerce Authority’s role as the gatekeeper for the refundable portion is a critical safeguard against waste.² The ACA’s “Certificate of Qualification” process requires an affidavit and a detailed description of the research activities.² To further strengthen this, the state should implement “Project-Level Reporting” similar to the new requirements for federal Form 6765.⁴⁵ Under this model, firms must break down their QREs by specific business components, describing the technical uncertainty addressed for each project.⁴⁵ While this increases the documentation burden, it ensures that only genuine innovation receives state support and provides an audit trail that is difficult to falsify.¹¹

Cost Analysis and the Multiplier Effect of Innovation

Opponents of permanent rate stabilization often cite the “foregone revenue” as a cost to the state’s general fund. However, a modern economic analysis must account for the dynamic effects of R&D investment, where the initial “cost” is actually a purchase of future taxable activity.⁸

The Revenue Recapture Mechanism

Innovation-heavy sectors in Arizona pay wages that are significantly higher than the state average. In the manufacturing sector alone, the average annual wage was $93,288 in 2024.¹⁷ The employees filling these roles pay Personal Income Tax (IIT) and consume goods and services that generate Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT).¹⁷ Furthermore, for every one in-state manufacturing job, an additional 2.42 jobs are supported in the broader economy.¹⁷

Table 7: The Revenue Recapture Mechanism

A static cost analysis might show that extending the 24% rate “costs” the state $50 million annually in foregone CIT.³⁸ However, if that $50 million incentive supports $500 million in new research spending, the resulting job creation and economic activity will generate a surplus of state revenue over a three-to-five-year period.⁸ In this light, the R&D credit is not a subsidy; it is a “loss-leader” strategy that the state uses to capture high-value market share in the global innovation economy.⁸

The Strategic Importance of Policy Continuity

The importance of stabilizing Arizona’s R&D rates cannot be overstated. We are currently in a “techno-statecraft” era where subnational actors—agencies, universities, and regional developers—must mobilize infrastructure and regulatory policy to attract global capital.⁹ Arizona’s semiconductor expansion, which has seen tens of billions in private investment from firms like Intel and TSMC, is a direct result of this territorial strategy.⁹

Alignment with Federal Policy Shifts

The federal “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) has fundamentally changed the innovation landscape by restoring full and permanent expensing for domestic R&D investments under Section 174.³⁵ This federal change effectively “supercharges” state-level credits.⁴⁸ Arizona has a historic opportunity to align its state tax code with this new federal permanence.³⁵ If the state allows its rates to sunset while the federal government is moving toward more aggressive support, it creates a “policy mismatch” that undermines the overall attractiveness of the Arizona market.²⁶

Protecting the SMB Success Story

SMBs are the “seeds” of the next Intel or TGen. Many of Arizona’s most successful technology firms started as small shops with fewer than 150 employees, leveraging the refundable credit to survive the “valley of death” between prototype and product.² Sunsetting the 24% rate is effectively a tax on the growth of these firms. It tells the next generation of Arizona entrepreneurs that the state’s support is conditional and expiring, a message that is fundamentally at odds with the “Silicon Desert” brand.⁸

Negative Consequences of Inaction

The risks of maintaining the current sunset schedule are significant and multi-dimensional. Inaction is not a neutral stance; it is a policy choice that will have tangible negative effects on the Arizona economy.

Sectoral Stagnation and Brain Drain

If the 2030 sunset is allowed to proceed, Arizona will likely see a slowing of investment in its most critical sectors.¹ Biotechnology and aerospace firms, which are highly mobile in the early stages, will choose jurisdictions like Michigan or California that offer more certain long-term fiscal environments.²⁵ This will lead to a “brain drain” of the state’s most talented engineers and scientists, who will follow the research capital to other states.¹⁰

Erosion of the Corporate-Academic Pipeline

The additional 10% credit for university research is the “glue” that binds the private sector to the state’s higher education system.³ If the primary credit rate drops, the overall incentive for firms to engage in complex basic research in Arizona is diminished.¹³ This could lead to a decline in corporate funding for Arizona’s universities, weakening the state’s research infrastructure and its ability to compete for federal grants like those provided by the CHIPS Act.⁹

Long-Term Fiscal Instability

While the sunset is intended to save the general fund money, the long-term result will likely be a reduction in total tax collections.⁸ A 20% credit on a stagnant $2 billion R&D economy generates less revenue for the state than a 24% credit on a booming $10 billion R&D economy.⁸ By choosing the “short-term gain” of a lower credit rate, the state risks the “long-term loss” of the high-wage tax base that the R&D credit was designed to build.⁸

Final Synthesis and Recommendations

The evidence gathered in this report points to a clear conclusion: the scheduled sunsetting of Arizona’s R&D tax credit rates is a threat to the state’s economic vitality and the growth of its SMB sector.¹ To mitigate this risk, the Arizona Legislature and the state government should move immediately to provide long-term fiscal certainty.

The first recommendation is the permanent extension of the 24% and 15% credit rates.¹ This should be accompanied by an expansion of the refundable credit cap to $15 million, ensuring that SMBs can continue to access the liquidity they need to scale.¹⁰ The second recommendation is the adoption of a “Rolling Sunset” and “Performance-Linked Indexing” model if a permanent extension is not feasible, guaranteeing a ten-year planning horizon for all research projects.³⁴

These policy changes should be implemented with enhanced fraud prevention protocols, including project-level reporting and automated screening software, to protect the state’s investment.⁴⁴ When viewed as a dynamic economic strategy, the “cost” of maintaining these rates is an investment that will pay for itself through high-wage job creation, increased tax revenue, and the continued transformation of Arizona into a global leader in the innovation economy.⁸

Works Cited

1. Arizona R&D Tax Credits, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/arizona-r-d-tax-credits
2. Arizona Commerce Authority REFUNDABLE RESEARCH AND …, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/media/ipolf0kc/aca-ruling-24-04-rd-website.pdf
3. 43-1168 – Credit for increased research activity, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azleg.gov/ars/43/01168.htm
4. Arizona Revised Statutes Title 43. Taxation of Income § 43-1168 – Codes – FindLaw, accessed March 16, 2026, https://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-43-taxation-of-income/az-rev-st-sect-43-1168/
5. Infographic: Everything You Need To Know About Arizona’s Refundable Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit – Boast.AI, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/rd/arizona-research-and-development-rd-tax-credit
6. Mesa R&D Tax Credit Benefits for Companies – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/arizona/case-studies/mesa/
7. Arizona Incentives – Research and Development Tax Credit Program for Business in AZ, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/incentives/research-development-tax-credit/
8. economic impacts of advancing arizona’s competitive position in the autonomous vehicle industry, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azchamberfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/January-2020-Foundation-AV-Impact-Study.pdf
9. Full article: Techno-statecraft and industrial strategy: semiconductor development in Arizona, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21582041.2025.2565226
10. Public Policy Guide – Arizona Tech Council, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2017-Public-Policy-Guide-FINALD.pdf
11. Arizona R&D Tax Credit: Everything You Need To Know – Boast, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/innovation-insights/arizona-rd-tax-credits
12. R&D Tax Credit Explained for Arizona Companies – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/arizona/
13. Form 346: Claim Your Research Tax Credit – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/glossary/arizona/form-346/
14. Tech Parks Arizona Drives $2.6 Billion Annual Economic Impact Fueling Thousands of High-Quality Jobs for Skilled Talent | AZBio, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azbio.org/tech-parks-arizona-drives-2-6-billion-annual-economic-impact-fueling-thousands-of-high-quality-jobs-for-skilled-talent
15. Arizona R&D Tax Credit | AndreTaxCo, PLLC, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.andretaxco.com/arizona-rdcredits
16. 2025 – 2030 A Statewide Vision for Bioscience Innovation and Impact – Flinn Foundation |, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.flinn.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Arizonas-Bioscience-Roadmap-Final-Draft-2025-08.pdf
17. Qualified Facility Tax Credit Program – Arizona Commerce Authority, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/media/nfdfueu1/2024-annual-qf-report_final-v2.pdf
18. Arizona R&D Tax Credit Services – TaxTaker, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.taxtaker.com/rd-tax-credit/arizona
19. States Enact Semiconductor Subsidies in the Wake of CHIPS – Tax Foundation, accessed March 16, 2026, https://taxfoundation.org/blog/state-semiconductor-incentives/
20. R&D Refundable Tax Credit – Arizona Commerce Authority, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/incentives/research-development-tax-credit/rd-refundable-tax-credit/
21. The 2025 Guide to State R&D Tax Credits | TaxTaker, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.taxtaker.com/blog/the-2025-guide-to-state-r-d-tax-credits
22. Arizona Commerce Authority REFUNDABLE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDIT – Program Rules & Guidelines1, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/media/1544133/rd-guidelines.pdf
23. Arizona Permits Use of Alternative Simplified Method for Tax Year 2023 Credit for Increased Research Activities – BDO USA, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.bdo.com/insights/tax/arizona-permits-use-of-alternative-simplified-method-for-tax-year-2023-credit-for-increased-research
24. Looking Ahead: The 2026 Forecast for R&D Tax Credits | NCH, accessed March 16, 2026, https://nchinc.com/blog/tax-accounting/looking-ahead-the-2026-forecast-for-rd-tax-credits/
25. California R&D Tax Credit Updates for 2026: Planning Under SB 711 – Cherry Bekaert, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.cbh.com/insights/articles/california-rd-tax-credit-planning-under-sb-711-2026-updates/
26. 6 States Just Changed Their R&D Tax Credit Rules: What Your Business Needs to Know, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/rd/6-states-just-changed-their-rd-tax-credit-rules-what-your-business-needs-to-know
27. R&D Tax Credit Rates and Terms by State | BDO Insights, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.bdo.com/insights/tax/state-r-d-tax-credits
28. State R&D Tax Credits: New Rules, New Opportunities – CLA, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.claconnect.com/en/resources/articles/26/state-r-and-d-tax-credits
29. State Tax Alert 04/03/2025 – Tax News Update, accessed March 16, 2026, https://taxnews.ey.com/Login/ViewNewsAttachment.aspx?AlertID=177214&AttachmentName=JC%2BqYs3tZKwMWGCtdoBooXZYGYEwa56P%2FEUs7p84CvQptsjWxyYVtBRO3hk3f6O2%2FsFRA1gKJVS%2BTlcxR%2BrKiA%3D%3D&ualertID=null
30. HB2897 – 562R – House Bill Summary – Arizona Legislature, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/56leg/2R/summary/H.HB2897_062024_TRANSMITTED.DOCX.htm
31. H.R. 1 and its Impacts on Arizona’s Clean Energy Economy – Arizona Technology Council, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/h-r-1-impacts-arizona-clean-energy-economy/
32. AzBusiness November/December 2025 by AZ Big Media – Issuu, accessed March 16, 2026, https://issuu.com/azbigmedia/docs/azbusiness_november_december_2025_
33. Public Policy Guide – Arizona Tech Council, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AZTC-Public-Policy-Guide-2018.pdf
34. Wetware’s Foreclosing Myopic Optimization: Audit, Prognosis, and the Lesser Gamble – Amazon S3, accessed March 16, 2026, https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/pfigshare-u-files/56729474/WetwaresForeclosingMyopicOptimizationAuditPrognosisandtheLesserGamble.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIYCQYOYV5JSSROOA/20260313/eu-west-1/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260313T182016Z&X-Amz-Expires=86400&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=11b55768899d41d9c06b0ce6b1e9faaf6c8a411527ef003f1dc216bc3904886e
35. Sweeping Tax Legislation Signed into Law – King & Spalding – Kslaw.com, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.kslaw.com/news-and-insights/sweeping-tax-legislation-signed-into-law
36. “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” – King & Spalding – Kslaw.com, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.kslaw.com/news-and-insights/one-big-beautiful-bill-act
37. 2025 Income Tax Credit Review – JLBC Website, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azjlbc.gov/revenues/jlitcrcrpt120225.pdf
38. Monthly Fiscal Highlights – September 2024, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azjlbc.gov/mfh/mfh-sept-24.pdf
39. STATE OF ARIZONA 2025 Tax Handbook – JLBC Website, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azjlbc.gov/revenues/25taxbk.pdf
40. Clean energy tax credits support jobs and the economy in Arizona, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Arizona_Clean_Energy_Tax_Credits_Economic_Research.pdf
41. Quality Jobs Tax Credit for Businesses in AZ – Arizona Commerce Authority, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/incentives/quality-jobs-tax-credit/
42. 2025 Research & Development Tax Credit Report to the Pennsylvania General Assembly (DOP-26), accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/revenue/documents/news-and-statistics/reportsstats/taxcredits/researchdevcredit/documents/2025_rd_report.pdf
43. HB 2897: general appropriations act; 2024-2025 – Arizona Legislature, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/56leg/2R/summary/H.HB2897_061224_APPROP.pdf
44. ARIZONA – STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY, accessed March 16, 2026, https://aset.az.gov/sites/default/files/media/Exhibit%204%20-%20Meeting%20packet%20-%20Letter%20of%20Recommendation.pdf
45. Research and Development Tax Credit | Tax Insights – KBKG, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.kbkg.com/research-and-development
46. R&D Tax Credits You May Have Missed in 2025: A Q1 Review – Escalon Services, accessed March 16, 2026, https://escalon.services/blog/taxes/rd-tax-credits-you-may-have-missed-in-2025-a-q1-review
47. AZTC Advocacy Update: Full R&D Expensing Restored, a Boost for Arizona Tech Companies, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/aztc-advocacy-update-full-r-and-d-expensing-restored/
48. Live Webinar: R&D TAX CREDITS AND EXPENSES RESTORED: A New Era For Manufacturing Innovation – Arizona Technology Council, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/event/r-and-d-tax-credits-and-expenses-restored-webinar/
49. Community Tech Events Archives – Arizona Technology Council, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.aztechcouncil.org/event_category/community-tech-events/
50. Arizona Taxpayers: What to Do Now That the R&D Expensing Deadline Has Passed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://kongcpas.com/arizona-taxpayers-what-to-do-now-that-the-rd-expensing-deadline-has-passed/