Leveraging Innovation Across the Front Range: A Policy Framework for Modernizing the Colorado Research and Development Tax Credit for Small and Medium Businesses

Introduction

The economic trajectory of Colorado has historically been defined by its ability to adapt to changing industrial paradigms, evolving from a frontier economy rooted in resource extraction and agriculture to a global leader in high-technology, aerospace, and advanced manufacturing sectors.¹ Central to this evolution was the passage of the Urban and Rural Enterprise Zone Act in 1986, which established a suite of incentives designed to direct capital toward economically distressed regions of the state.² Among these incentives, the Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit, codified under C.R.S. 39-30-105.5, remains a primary tool for stimulating technical innovation.³

However, as the Colorado economy has matured, a significant geographic mismatch has emerged. The primary state R&D tax credit is currently available exclusively to businesses located within designated Enterprise Zones, a restriction that effectively excludes thousands of innovative small and medium businesses (SMBs) operating in vibrant but non-distressed technology hubs such as Boulder, Centennial, and parts of the Denver South region.⁵ This policy report examines the implications of this geographic barrier, evaluates the current framework from the perspective of SMBs, and proposes strategic legislative reforms to ensure that Colorado’s innovation incentives are aligned with the spatial realities of the modern tech economy.

The Statutory Context and Evolution of the Enterprise Zone R&D Credit

The Colorado Enterprise Zone Research and Development Tax Credit was established in 1988 through Senate Bill 88-31 to encourage businesses to invest in research and experimental activities within economically depressed areas.² The legislative intent was to provide a “pull” factor for high-wage jobs in counties facing high unemployment, low per capita income, or stagnant population growth.⁶ Under the current statute, any taxpayer who makes expenditures in research and experimental activities, as defined by Section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), is eligible for a credit against their state income tax.³

The credit is fundamentally incremental in its design. It allows for an income tax credit equal to 3 percent of the amount by which the taxpayer’s research and experimental expenditures in the Enterprise Zone during the current tax year exceed the average of the total actual expenditures for such activities in the same zone over the prior two years.³ This mechanism ensures that the state only subsidizes “new” innovation above a baseline of existing activity.⁴ For a business that is new to an Enterprise Zone or has no prior R&D spending, the base amount is calculated as zero, providing a significant initial incentive.⁴

Table 1: Statutory Specification for Colorado EZ R&D Credit

The administrative requirements for the credit are rigorous and localized. Businesses must apply for pre-certification through the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT) application portal before beginning any eligible R&D activity.⁵ This pre-certification must be renewed annually and is reviewed by a local Enterprise Zone administrator.⁵ Following the completion of the tax year, the business must then complete a certification application to verify the actual expenditures made during the certified period.⁵ Only after this two-step certification process is a tax credit certificate issued, which must be submitted alongside the Colorado Department of Revenue Form DR 1366.⁹

The Geographic Restriction Barrier and the Innovation-Distress Paradox

The core policy challenge facing the Colorado legislature is the “Innovation-Distress Paradox.” The criteria used to designate Enterprise Zones are based on measures of economic hardship, which are inherently at odds with the environmental conditions required for high-technology R&D hubs to flourish. To be designated as an Enterprise Zone, a region must generally meet at least one of the following criteria: an unemployment rate at least 25% higher than the state average, a per capita income less than 75% of the state average, or a population growth rate less than 25% of the state average.⁸

In contrast, modern innovation theory and empirical data suggest that high-tech R&D thrives in “clusters” characterized by proximity to Tier-1 research universities, access to highly skilled labor, and robust infrastructure.⁷ In Colorado, these clusters are primarily located in non-distressed urban and suburban corridors. For example, the City of Centennial is a premier business destination for aerospace and SaaS companies, housing over 220,000 employees and contributing significantly to the state’s 10% tech-driven GDP.⁷ However, because Centennial is economically successful, the vast majority of its commercial areas do not qualify as Enterprise Zones.⁷ This creates a geographic barrier where companies in the most innovative regions of the state are statutorily barred from accessing the state’s primary R&D incentive.

Table 2: Geographic and Economic Mismatch

This mismatch has profound implications for SMBs. Unlike large corporations that may have the resources to establish satellite research facilities within a designated Enterprise Zone specifically to capture tax benefits, SMBs are typically tethered to a single location.⁹ For an early-stage startup in Boulder or a growing cybersecurity firm in Centennial, the cost of relocating to an Enterprise Zone often outweighs the benefit of the 3% tax credit.⁴ Consequently, the current policy framework provides a subsidy to innovation in areas where it is less naturally occurring while penalizing the firms that are currently driving Colorado’s reputation as a “hotbed of American innovation”.¹

Impact of the 25% Annual Usage Limit and the SMB Cash Flow Gap

For the subset of SMBs that are located within an Enterprise Zone, the “25% usage rule” presents a second-order policy challenge. Under C.R.S. 39-30-105.5(2), a taxpayer can only claim up to 25 percent of the total credit amount in a given year.² While the remaining balance can be carried forward indefinitely, this rule effectively forces a four-year amortization of the tax benefit.⁴

For large, established corporations with predictable multi-year tax liabilities, this rule is a manageable administrative detail. However, for SMBs—particularly those in the high-tech sector—cash flow is the primary constraint on growth.⁷ High-growth startups often incur significant R&D expenses years before achieving profitability.⁷ A non-refundable credit that is further diluted by a 25% annual usage limit provides very little immediate relief during the most capital-intensive phases of a firm’s lifecycle.⁴

The rationale for the usage limit was originally to protect the state’s general fund from sudden, large-scale revenue losses.² However, recent shifts in federal tax law—specifically the requirement under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) to amortize R&D expenses over five years (or 15 years for foreign research)—have already placed an increased tax burden on innovative firms.¹⁴ While federal legislative developments in 2025 and 2026 have aimed to restore immediate expensing, the “waiting period” for state-level R&D credits in Colorado remains a competitive disadvantage when compared to states like Arizona, which offer immediate and sometimes refundable R&D benefits.¹⁹

Comparative Analysis: Colorado versus Regional Competitors

Colorado’s R&D tax credit is currently less aggressive than those of its primary regional competitors for tech talent and business relocation. As SMBs in sectors like quantum computing and semiconductors evaluate where to expand their operations, the geographic and usage restrictions of the Colorado credit are compared against the more flexible models found in Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico.²²

Table 3: Colorado versus Regional Competitors

Arizona’s model is particularly noteworthy for its focus on SMBs. By offering a 24% credit that is available statewide and including a 75% refundable component for companies with fewer than 150 employees, Arizona provides a powerful cash-flow incentive that Colorado currently lacks.²² This disparity is reflected in competitive relocation projects. For instance, the Colorado Economic Development Commission (EDC) has recently reviewed projects such as “Project Electron” and “Project Superdrive,” where companies have openly compared Colorado’s incentive packages against those in Arizona, Utah, and New Mexico.²⁶ Access to a “tech hub ecosystem” and talent are cited as Colorado’s strengths, but the “tax environment” and “incentives” are consistently mentioned as critical decision-making factors for manufacturing and R&D expansion.²⁶

Proposed Solution 1: Statewide Decoupling (The “Innovation Baseline” Credit)

The most robust solution to the geographic restriction barrier is for the Colorado legislature to decouple the R&D tax credit from the Enterprise Zone program. This would involve amending C.R.S. 39-30-105.5 to create a statewide R&D credit available to any qualifying business, regardless of their location within a “distressed” area.

Legislative Implementation and Tiered Structure

To maintain the state’s commitment to economically distressed areas while supporting statewide innovation, a tiered credit structure is recommended. The legislature could establish a base “Universal Innovation Credit” and maintain an “Enterprise Zone Kicker” to preserve the relative advantage of distressed regions.

• Universal Tier: A 3% incremental R&D credit available statewide to any business meeting the federal Section 174 definitions. This ensures that a firm in Boulder or Centennial receives the same baseline support as a firm in a rural zone.⁴
• Rural/EZ Tier: An enhanced 4.5% or 5% credit for R&D activities conducted within a designated Enterprise Zone or an “enhanced rural” Enterprise Zone. This maintains the incentive for firms to locate in distressed areas while providing a floor for the rest of the state.⁶

Benefits for SMBs

A statewide credit would immediately remove the “spatial penalty” for SMBs that choose to co-locate near university research centers or established talent clusters.¹⁴ It would simplify the administrative process by eliminating the need to prove that research activities occurred strictly within zone boundaries—a task that is increasingly difficult in an era of remote collaboration and distributed teams.³⁰ Furthermore, by providing a statewide baseline, the state would level the playing field for SMBs that compete with larger corporations capable of “boundary shopping”.¹⁸

Fiscal Safeguards and Fraud Prevention

Expanding the R&D credit statewide requires rigorous oversight to prevent fraud and ensure that the state is subsidizing genuine innovation rather than routine business activity.

• Pre-certification Portal Expansion: The existing OEDIT pre-certification portal should be expanded to accommodate statewide applications. The manual review process currently performed by local EZ administrators should be centralized or standardized to ensure consistent application of the IRC Section 174 “four-part test” (business component, technological nature, elimination of uncertainty, and process of experimentation).⁵
• Annual Aggregate Cap: To ensure fiscal predictability, the legislature could implement an annual cap on the total amount of credits awarded statewide, similar to the $4 million annual cap used for the Advanced Industry Investment Tax Credit.³¹
• Wage and Quality Standards: Eligibility for the statewide credit could be tied to paying “quality wages,” defined as at least 100% or 110% of the average annual wage for the county in which the firm is located, a mechanism already used in the Job Growth Incentive Tax Credit (JGITC) program.²⁰

Proposed Solution 2: The “Strategic Technology Hub” Opt-In Model

An alternative to full statewide decoupling is the expansion of the “Strategic Technology Hub” model, which has already been piloted through the CHIPS Zone and Quantum facility initiatives. This approach allows the state to maintain a geographic focus but moves beyond “distress” as the sole metric for inclusion.

The CHIPS Zone Precedent

In 2023, the Colorado General Assembly passed House Bill 23-1260, creating the CHIPS Zone Program.³³ This legislation allows municipalities, counties, or regions that are not in an Enterprise Zone to establish a state-designated CHIPS Zone specifically for semiconductor manufacturing and R&D.³³ Companies in these zones can access the Enterprise Zone R&D credit, as well as investment and job training credits, provided they are engaged in the fabrication, assembly, or testing of semiconductors.³³

Expanding to “Innovation Opportunity Hubs”

The legislature could expand this model by allowing local governments to propose “Innovation Opportunity Hubs” centered around other strategic industry clusters, such as aerospace, biotechnology, or cybersecurity.⁷ Under this proposal, local governments in areas like Boulder, Fort Collins, or Centennial would submit an application to the Economic Development Commission (EDC) justifying the creation of a hub based on the presence of a strategic industry cluster.³⁴

Table 4: CHIPS Zone Model vs. Innovation Hub Model

Governance and Performance Metrics

This model provides the government with high levels of control over fiscal impact. Each hub would be required to have documented economic development objectives with measurable outcomes.³⁴ The CHIPS Zone Administrator (within OEDIT) already reviews zones every five years to assess performance and recommend expiration for zones where no companies have certified credits.³⁴ Expanding this to broader “Innovation Hubs” would create a competitive, performance-based system that rewards local governments for fostering actual R&D activity.³⁴

Fraud Prevention and Administrative Integrity

A critical concern for any expansion of tax incentives is the risk of “gaming” the system. Colorado can mitigate this risk by integrating modern data analytics and clear statutory guardrails into the policy change.

Strengthening the “But-For” Analysis

The state should require more rigorous documentation from larger firms to prove that the tax credit was a “significant factor” in the decision to invest in Colorado.¹² While the “but-for” standard is difficult to measure precisely—with some studies suggesting only 5% of incremental R&D is strictly attributable to the credit—requiring firms to attest to this under penalty of perjury, as is done for the Advanced Industry Investment Tax Credit, provides a deterrent against frivolous claims.³¹

Preventing “Incentive-Chasing” Relocations

To prevent businesses from moving short distances just to cross a newly established “Innovation Hub” boundary, the legislature should strictly maintain the existing “relocation and expansion” rules. Currently, businesses that relocate from one part of Colorado to another are generally ineligible for EZ credits unless they demonstrate a significant increase in capacity, such as a $1 million investment in the new facility or a 10% increase in employment over the previous 12-month average.⁴¹

Enhanced Audit Capability

The Colorado Department of Revenue (DOR) should be granted additional resources to perform “spot-check” audits of R&D claims. Specifically, the DOR should verify that “Contract Research” expenses—which are often a source of ambiguity—meet the requirement of being performed for the benefit of the contracting firm and, under current law, within the designated zone.⁴ In a statewide model, the audit focus would shift from “where” the work was done to “what” was done, ensuring compliance with the technical requirements of the IRC Section 174.⁴

Fiscal and Cost Analysis: Framing Innovation as a Capital Investment

An expansion of the R&D credit should not be viewed as a “sunk cost” but as a capital investment in the state’s tax base. While the initial fiscal note for a statewide expansion would show a reduction in general fund revenue, the long-term economic benefits are projected to exceed the outlay through high-wage job growth and sales tax recapture.

The Dynamics of Revenue Recapture

High-technology R&D is a high-multiplier activity. Approximately 75% of R&D spending is allocated directly to workers’ salaries.²¹ In Colorado, the average wage for employees in the tech sector significantly exceeds the state average; for instance, “Project Captain” in Boulder County proposed 110 jobs with an average yearly wage of nearly $100,000.²⁹

Table 5: Revenue Recapture Mechanism

Quantifying the Return on Investment (ROI)

While some studies of state-level R&D credits show a negative fiscal ROI in the short term (e.g., Georgia’s ROI of -44%), these models often fail to capture the “social returns” and the “agglomeration effects” that occur over a 10-to-20-year horizon.⁴⁰ Economists have found that the social returns to R&D are at least twice—and as much as 20 times—the private return.¹⁸ By expanding the credit to SMBs in non-EZ areas, Colorado captures these spillovers, which include the creation of a “Cyber Ready Workforce” and the retention of “transitioning service members” who choose to stay in the state because of the availability of high-tech jobs.²⁸

The Importance of Policy Change and the Consequences of Inaction

The decision to expand the R&D tax credit is fundamentally about the long-term competitiveness of Colorado. The state currently ranks in the top ten for many economic metrics, including its status as a “Tech Hub” for quantum technology.¹⁵ However, this leadership is fragile and depends on maintaining an environment where SMBs can take the significant financial risks associated with technical experimentation.²²

Negative Consequences of Maintaining the Geographic Barrier

• Incentivizing Stagnation: The current system encourages innovative firms to stay in distressed areas where talent may be harder to find, or to move out of the state entirely. If an aerospace startup in Centennial cannot access the 3% credit, but a competitor in Phoenix can access a 24% refundable credit, the Colorado firm faces a structural cost of capital disadvantage.⁷
• Brain Drain to Regional Competitors: As seen in recent EDC reports, companies are actively considering Utah and Arizona as alternatives to Colorado.²⁷ If Colorado fails to modernize its incentives, the “Front Range” could lose its critical mass of talent, which is the primary driver of its 10% GDP contribution from the tech industry.⁷
• The “Shadow Tax” of Federal Compliance: With the recent IRS requirement for enhanced project-level reporting on Form 6765, the administrative burden on SMBs is increasing.¹⁹ If Colorado maintains its own complex, geographically-bound certification process on top of these federal changes, it creates a “shadow tax” of compliance that disproportionately harms small firms with limited accounting resources.⁴

Conclusion: A Strategic Path Forward

The Colorado legislature has a clear opportunity to modernize its innovation framework by expanding the R&D tax credit. Whether through full statewide decoupling or a more targeted “Strategic Technology Hub” model, the goal should be to align the state’s incentives with the actual locations of 21st-century innovation. By removing the geographic barrier, the state not only supports its vibrant SMB sector but also ensures that the “quantum” and “semiconductor” hubs of the future have a stable, competitive fiscal environment in which to grow.³³

The importance of this policy change cannot be overstated. Innovation is not a static activity that can be neatly contained within the boundaries of 1980s-era Enterprise Zones.² It is a dynamic, collaborative process that requires the free flow of ideas and capital across the entire state. A modernized R&D credit will pay for itself by anchoring the next generation of high-growth companies in Colorado, ensuring that the state remains a global leader in the knowledge economy for decades to come.¹

Works Cited

1. Elevating Colorado 2025, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/sites/coedit/files/documents/CEDS_2025_Accessible_092225%20FINAL.pdf
2. ENTERPRISE ZONES TAX EXPENDITURES – Agencies – Colorado …, accessed March 16, 2026, https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2020-te9_enterprise_zones_tax_expenditures_0.pdf
3. Colorado Revised Statutes Title 39. Taxation § 39-30-105.5 – Codes – FindLaw, accessed March 16, 2026, https://codes.findlaw.com/co/title-39-taxation/co-rev-st-sect-39-30-105-5/
4. Colorado R&D Tax Credits – Get Info and Calculate R&D Tax Credits – Strike Tax Advisory, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/colorado-r-d-tax-credits
5. Enterprise Zone Research and Development Tax Credit | Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/enterprise-zone-research-and-development-tax-credit
6. Enterprise Zone Program | Colorado Office of Economic Development & International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://choosecolorado.com/doing-business/incentives/enterprise-zone-program/
7. Top Tech Companies in Centennial: Innovation Hub Guide – Denver South, accessed March 16, 2026, https://denver-south.com/blog/top-tech-companies-driving-innovation-in-centennial/
8. Enterprise Zone Program | Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/enterprise-zone-program
9. Colorado R&D Tax Credit Overview for Businesses – Swanson Reed, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/colorado/
10. FYI – For Your Information, accessed March 16, 2026, https://hermes.cde.state.co.us/islandora/object/co%3A10955/datastream/OBJ/download/Research_and_development_income_tax_credit_for_enterprise_zones.pdf
11. Enterprise Zones | Adams County, CO, accessed March 16, 2026, https://adamscountyco.gov/our-county/community-economic-development/economic-development/enterprise-zones/
12. Enterprise Zone Tax Guide | Department of Revenue – Colorado tax, accessed March 16, 2026, https://tax.colorado.gov/enterprise-zone-tax-guide
13. Colorado Economic Development Commission Approves New Enterprise Zone Boundaries Effective January 1, 2026 – Ryan, accessed March 16, 2026, https://ryan.com/about-ryan/news-and-insights/2025/colorado-enterprise-zone-boundaries-2026/
14. Keeping up in Colorado: What in-state manufacturers need to know about R&D tax rules, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.wipfli.com/insights/articles/keeping-up-in-colorado-what-in-state-manufacturers-need-to-know-about-r-and-d-tax-rules
15. OEDIT 2024-2025 Annual Report – Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/sites/coedit/files/documents/OEDIT%202025%20Annual%20Report%202025%20FINAL%20Full%20Report%20.pdf
16. Denver Enterprise Zone – ArcGIS Hub, accessed March 16, 2026, https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/561f535d380e47dba42b66a61d4fbecc
17. Colorado Enterprise Zone Program – Thornton OED – Economic Development, accessed March 16, 2026, https://businessinthornton.com/site-selection/business-incentives/colorado-enterprise-zone-program/
18. Recent Research: Unravelling the paradox of R&D tax credits – SSTI, accessed March 16, 2026, https://ssti.org/blog/recent-research-unravelling-paradox-rd-tax-credits
19. The R&D Tax Credit in 2026: Key Changes to Be Aware Of – CSSI Services, accessed March 16, 2026, https://cssiservices.com/rd-tax-credit-in-2026/
20. Tax Credits For Startups In Colorado – 2025 – Every.io, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.every.io/blog-post/tax-credits-for-startups-in-colorado
21. R&D Tax Credits: Driving American Innovation and Competitiveness, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.kajmst.com/articles/r-d-tax-credits-driving-american-innovation-and-competitiveness
22. The 2025 Guide to State R&D Tax Credits | TaxTaker, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.taxtaker.com/blog/the-2025-guide-to-state-r-d-tax-credits
23. R&D Tax Credit Rates and Terms by State | BDO Insights, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.bdo.com/insights/tax/state-r-d-tax-credits
24. Research & Development Tax Credits by State – Abdo Solutions, accessed March 16, 2026, https://abdosolutions.com/research-development-tax-credits-by-state/
25. Research and Development Credits | Sumit Credits, accessed March 16, 2026, https://sumitcredits.com/services/research-and-development-credits/
26. Colorado EDC approves nearly $6 million in tax incentives for 3 companies, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/01/16/colorado-edc-approves-nearly-6-million-in-tax-incentives-for-3-companies/
27. April 2025: EDC Approved Job Growth Incentive Tax Credit and Strategic Fund Projects | Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/news/april-2025-edc-approved-job-growth-incentive-tax-credit-and-strategic-fund-projects
28. January 2026: EDC Approved Job Growth Incentive Tax Credit and Strategic Fund Projects | Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/news/january-2026-edc-approved-job-growth-incentive-tax-credit-and-strategic-fund-projects
29. Colorado approves millions in incentives for semiconductor manufacturer’s expansion, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.denvergazette.com/2025/10/16/colorado-approves-millions-in-incentives-for-semiconductor-manufacturers-expansion/
30. 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index | Full Study – Tax Foundation, accessed March 16, 2026, https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/state/2026-state-tax-competitiveness-index/
31. Advanced Industry Investment Tax Credit | Colorado Office of …, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/advanced-industries-investment-tax-credit
32. Concerning The Expansion Of The Advanced Industry Investment Tax Credit And In Connection Therewith – Colorado Law Scholarly Commons, accessed March 16, 2026, https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10921&context=session-laws-2001-2050
33. CHIPS Zone Program | City of Colorado Springs, accessed March 16, 2026, https://coloradosprings.gov/CHIPSzone
34. CHIPS Zones Program | Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/chips-zones-program
35. Empowering Colorado’s Tech Industry: Leveraging Federal Funding …, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/blog-post/empowering-colorados-tech-industry-leveraging-federal-funding-to-support-deep-tech
36. Boulder CHIPS Zone | City of Boulder, accessed March 16, 2026, https://bouldercolorado.gov/services/boulder-chips-zone
37. ADVANCED INDUSTRY INVESTMENT CREDIT | Colorado, accessed March 16, 2026, https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2021_te15_advanced_industry_investment_credit.pdf
38. Colorado Springs City Council Approves CHIPS Zone Boundaries, accessed March 16, 2026, https://coloradospringschamberedc.com/colorado-springs-city-council-approves-chips-zone-boundaries/
39. HOUSE BILL 24-1325 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Valdez and Soper …, accessed March 16, 2026, http://leg.colorado.gov/bill_files/44147/download
40. Tax Incentive Evaluation – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed March 16, 2026, https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Fiscal/evaluationDB/TaxIncentiveEvaluationGeorgiaResearchandDevelopmentTaxCredit.pdf
41. Enterprise Zone Investment Tax Credit | Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, accessed March 16, 2026, https://oedit.colorado.gov/enterprise-zone-investment-tax-credit
42. The Federal Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit – EveryCRSReport.com, accessed March 16, 2026, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R48848.html
43. 2024 RETURN ON INVESTMENT ANALYSIS – Louisiana.gov, accessed March 16, 2026, https://dam.ldr.la.gov/publications/R-21000(1_25)%20ROI%20Report%20d5%20(WEB).pdf
44. Advocacy – Federal – Colorado Technology Association, accessed March 16, 2026, https://coloradotechnology.org/advocacy/federal/