Navigating the Administrative Frontier: A Strategic Evaluation of Iowa’s New IEDA Pre-Approval Requirement for Research and Development Tax Credits

Author: Lia Araujo | Iowa R&D Tax Policy Consultant
Published: July 30, 2026 | Series: Swanson Reed State Tax Incentives

Answer Capsule: How Does Iowa’s Shift to IEDA Administration Impact Startups?

Senate File 657 radically transformed Iowa’s Research Activities Credit (RAC) from a predictable, entitlement-based tax offset into a capped ($40 million), discretionary grant program managed by the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA). This shift introduces a severe “compliance trap” for SMBs, as mandatory CPA verification and narrow industry definitions consume an excessive percentage of smaller claim values. To preserve its startup ecosystem against aggressive neighbors like Minnesota, Iowa must implement a Federal “Deemed Certified” Safe Harbor for Qualified Small Businesses and deploy the “Innovation Iowa” integrated API to eliminate duplicative reporting between the IEDA and IDR.

Key Takeaways

The End of Rolling Conformity: The transition away from the legacy, back-end RAC system replaces a predictable 6.5% rate with a highly uncertain, pro-rata allocation of “up to 3.5%” subject to a hard $40M statewide cap.
Regressive Compliance Tax: Mandatory front-end CPA verification disproportionately harms early-stage innovators; a firm claiming $50,000 in QREs may lose over 85% of their $1,750 net benefit to specialized compliance fees.
The Industry Definition Barrier: IEDA’s narrow focus on bioscience, advanced manufacturing, and tech explicitly blocks “hybrid innovators” (e.g., agricultural or construction tech) from accessing necessary capital.
Proposed Solution 1 (QSB Safe Harbor): Allow startups meeting the federal Qualified Small Business definition (<$5M revenue) to bypass IEDA contracts via a “Deemed Certified” fast-track relying on federal Form 6765.
Proposed Solution 2 (Unified Digital Portal): Invest $2.5M in the “Innovation Iowa” integrated API to seamlessly share CPA workpapers and technical interview data between the IEDA and the Department of Revenue, drastically lowering compliance friction.

Introduction

The economic landscape of the State of Iowa has long been defined by its resilience and its commitment to fostering a competitive environment for industrial innovation. Central to this mission for over four decades has been the Research Activities Credit, a fiscal tool designed to incentivize the high-risk, high-reward endeavors of the private sector. However, the legislative transition initiated by Senate File 657 represents a fundamental paradigm shift in how the state manages these incentives. By moving from an entitlement-based model administered by the Iowa Department of Revenue to a discretionary, application-based program overseen by the Iowa Economic Development Authority, the state has introduced a significant front-end administrative hurdle. This transition, while intended to ensure fiscal accountability and target strategic industries, presents unique challenges for small to medium-sized businesses that are the lifeblood of Iowa’s burgeoning technology and manufacturing sectors.

The Historical Context of the Iowa Research Activities Credit

To understand the magnitude of the current policy shift, one must first examine the robust framework that preceded it. Iowa was a pioneer in the realm of state-level research incentives, becoming only the third state in the nation to adopt a research and development tax credit following the federal implementation of Internal Revenue Code Section 41 in 1981.¹ For most of its history, the Iowa Research Activities Credit was characterized by its simplicity and its broad accessibility. It was structured as a “rolling conformity” credit, meaning that the definition of what constituted “qualified research” at the state level was almost entirely synonymous with the federal definition.³ This alignment allowed businesses to utilize their federal Form 6765 as the primary evidentiary basis for their state claims, significantly reducing the dual-filing burden that plagues many other jurisdictions.³

The legacy credit was essentially a back-end benefit. A business would conduct its research, calculate its qualified research expenses—which included wages, supplies, and contract research costs—and then claim the credit on its annual tax return.⁶ Because the credit was uncapped and fully refundable for many years, it served as a reliable source of liquidity for pre-revenue startups and growth-stage companies.⁷ In fiscal year 2024 alone, Iowa businesses claimed approximately $77.6 million through this program, a testament to its widespread utilization.⁷

However, the very success and predictability of the Research Activities Credit led to its eventual overhaul. Legislative concerns regarding the state’s long-term fiscal liability, combined with a desire to more narrowly tailor incentives toward specific “targeted industries,” drove a series of reforms starting in 2018 and culminating in the 2025 legislative session.⁷ These reforms began by narrowing industry eligibility and phasing down refundability, but the most profound change was the introduction of the mandatory IEDA certification process.

The Policy Issue: The IEDA Pre-Approval Hurdle

The core of the current policy challenge lies in the new requirement that businesses must be certified by the Iowa Economic Development Authority as a “qualified business” before they can even contemplate claiming the research and development credit.¹¹ This is not merely an additional form to be filed; it is a fundamental shift in the timing and nature of the incentive. By moving the administrative requirements to the “front end” of the tax cycle, the state has transformed a predictable tax benefit into a competitive, grant-like allocation process.⁹

The Mechanics of Certification and Application

Under the new framework, which becomes effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, the path to obtaining an R&D tax credit is now a three-step administrative process.

Certification Application: First, the business must submit an application for certification to the IEDA.¹¹ This application is reviewed to determine if the business is primarily engaged in one of four approved industries: advanced manufacturing, bioscience, insurance and finance, or technology and innovation.¹⁰ Within these categories, the IEDA further restricts eligibility to specific sectors, such as crop protection, hybrid seed technologies, and medical equipment.¹¹
Contract Execution: Second, once certified, the business must enter into a formal contract with the IEDA.¹¹ This contract outlines the program requirements and mandates that the business remain in compliance with various state and federal regulations.
Annual Tax Credit Application: Third, the business must submit an annual application for the tax credit itself by January 31 of each year, covering the research conducted in the prior year.¹¹ This annual application must be accompanied by a report verified by an independent Certified Public Accountant, adding a layer of professional expense and scrutiny that was previously optional for many small claimants.⁷

The Uncertainty of Pro-Rata Allocation

Perhaps the most significant administrative hurdle for SMBs is the introduction of the $40 million statewide cap and the subsequent pro-rata allocation method.⁷ Unlike the legacy RAC, where the 6.5% rate was fixed and entitlement-driven, the new program offers a rate of “up to 3.5%”.⁷ Because the total pool is capped, if the sum of all approved applications exceeds $40 million, the IEDA will reduce each award proportionally.⁷

For a small business, this creates a profound “uncertainty gap.” A startup planning its budget for 2026 may estimate that its $200,000 in research spending will yield a $7,000 state credit. However, they will not know the actual value of that credit until the IEDA processes all applications and divides the $40 million pool—a process that may take months after the close of the tax year.⁷ This lack of predictability undermines the very purpose of the credit, which is to provide stable financial support for long-term research initiatives.

Impact on Small to Medium-Sized Businesses

While the IEDA pre-approval requirement is intended to prevent fraud and ensure that state dollars support high-value industries, its practical effect on Iowa’s SMB community is often punitive. Large corporations like Deere & Co. possess the internal legal and accounting departments necessary to manage complex, multi-stage application processes.⁸ For a five-person biotechnology firm or a local software developer, the time and financial resources required to navigate the IEDA portal and secure CPA verification represent a significant diversion from their core technical work.

The Regressive Nature of Compliance Costs

The mandatory CPA verification requirement is particularly burdensome for SMBs. Under the federal system and the legacy Iowa RAC, many small businesses could rely on their own internal records or their generalist tax preparer to file for the credit.¹⁴ The new program, however, requires a specialized, verified report of qualified research expenditures.⁷ R&D tax credit specialists and CPAs typically charge fees based on a percentage of the credit identified (often 15% to 25%) or hourly rates ranging from $195 to $395.¹⁴

Table 1: The Regressive Compliance “Tax”

Claim Size	Expected 3.5% Credit	Estimated Compliance Cost (CPA/Consultant)	Net Benefit to Business	Compliance “Tax” Rate
$50,000 QREs	$1,750	$1,500	$250	85.7%
$250,000 QREs	$8,750	$3,000	$5,750	34.3%
$1,000,000 QREs	$35,000	$7,500	$27,500	21.4%
$10,000,000 QREs	$350,000	$40,000	$310,000	11.4%

As the data suggests, the cost of compliance is heavily regressive. A small innovator conducting $50,000 of research might see over 85% of their potential state benefit consumed by the fees required to secure it. This “compliance trap” effectively excludes the smallest and most innovative firms from participating in the program, concentrating the state’s $40 million investment among only the largest and most well-capitalized entities.

The Industry Definition Barrier

The IEDA certification process requires businesses to fit into narrowly defined categories. While advanced manufacturing and bioscience are broadly defined, the exclusion of sectors such as architecture, agriculture production, and construction can have unintended consequences.¹⁰ Many SMBs in Iowa are “hybrid” innovators. For example, a small construction company developing a new proprietary composite material for modular homes is performing legitimate materials science research.¹⁴ However, because they are “primarily engaged” in construction, they may be denied certification under the new rules, despite their project’s technical merit.¹¹ This rigid, industry-first approach fails to recognize that innovation often happens at the intersection of traditional and technology sectors.

Comparative Regional Analysis: Iowa’s Competitive Positioning

The administrative hurdle of the IEDA pre-approval requirement must be evaluated against the strategies of neighboring states. Iowa’s labor market remains competitive, but it faces a persistent slowdown in job creation, with only 500 nonfarm jobs added in the first half of 2025.¹⁹ In this environment, the ease of accessing innovation incentives becomes a key differentiator for businesses deciding where to locate.

Table 2: Regional R&D Incentive Frameworks

State	Primary R&D Benefit	Refundability	Administrative Model
Iowa	3.5% of QREs	Fully Refundable	Front-end IEDA Pre-Approval + Capped
Minnesota	10% on first $2M	25% Refundable (2026)	Back-end Tax Filing (Schedule RD)
Wisconsin	5.75% of QREs	15% Refundable	Back-end Tax Filing
Nebraska	Based on Federal Credit	Refundable	Back-end Tax Filing

Minnesota, in particular, has moved to increase the attractiveness of its program by making its R&D credit partially refundable, jumping to a 25% refundability rate in 2026.¹⁶ Unlike Iowa, Minnesota does not require pre-certification, allowing startups to focus on their research and handle the documentation during their standard tax filing window.²² If Iowa’s administrative burden becomes too great, the state risks losing its most research-intensive firms to neighbors who offer a more streamlined path to capital.

Strategic Solution 1: Implementing a Small Business “Safe Harbor” Certification

To address the administrative friction for SMBs while maintaining the IEDA’s oversight goals, the Iowa legislature should implement a “Safe Harbor” certification for businesses that meet specific size and revenue thresholds. This solution leverages existing federal standards to create an expedited path for Iowa’s most vulnerable innovators.

The “Deemed Certified” Model

Under this proposal, any Iowa business that qualifies as a “Qualified Small Business” under the federal definition—having less than $5 million in gross receipts and being in operation for less than five years—would be “deemed certified” for the Iowa R&D Tax Credit Program.² Rather than undergoing a full IEDA review process, these businesses would simply submit a copy of their federal Form 6765 and a notarized affidavit stating they are engaged in a targeted industry.⁴

This “Fast-Track” certification would bypass the requirement for a multi-year contract and annual IEDA review for businesses below a certain claim threshold (e.g., $10,000 in credit value). This does not exempt the business from the rules, but it moves the burden of proof from a front-end barrier to a back-end audit process, similar to the traditional tax model.

Benefits and Implementation

By adopting the federal QSB definition, Iowa would create immediate synergy for startups that are already utilizing the federal payroll tax offset.¹⁴ This alignment reduces the “cognitive load” on entrepreneurs, who can then use a single set of documentation for both federal and state purposes. For the IEDA, this would drastically reduce the volume of small-scale applications that must be manually reviewed, allowing staff to focus their expertise on high-value, high-complexity contracts with large industrial partners.

Strategic Solution 2: Digital Modernization and Unified Verification Portal

The second practical solution involves the creation of a unified digital portal that bridges the gap between the IEDA and the Iowa Department of Revenue. The current “Policy Issue” is exacerbated by the fact that businesses must often provide the same financial and technical data to two different state agencies.¹¹

The “Innovation Iowa” Integrated API

The state should invest in a digital platform that allows for the seamless transfer of data between the IEDA certification system and the IDR tax portal. This platform would feature:

Standardized Digital Workpapers: Instead of requiring a narrative “CPA report,” the portal would provide a standardized set of digital workpapers that guide the accountant through the four-part test and Iowa-specific requirements.²⁶ This standardization would reduce the time required for CPA verification, lowering the fees charged to the SMB.
Real-Time Allocation Tracking: To address the uncertainty of the $40 million cap, the portal could provide an “Estimated Allocation Gauge.” As applications are submitted, businesses could see the current demand on the pool, allowing them to make more informed cash-flow projections.⁷
Automated Compliance Flags: The system could utilize automated cross-referencing with other state databases to verify wage thresholds, residency of employees, and the primary business activity code of the applicant.⁷

Synergy with Federal Modernization

The IRS has recently updated Form 6765 to require more detailed, business-component level information starting in 2025.¹⁵ By aligning Iowa’s digital portal with these new federal data requirements, the state can ensure that any documentation a business prepares for the IRS is automatically usable for IEDA certification. This “upload once, certify twice” approach would be a powerful competitive advantage for the state.

Ensuring Accountability and Preventing Fraud

While streamlining the process for SMBs is critical, the government must still protect the $40 million annual investment from wastage and fraud. The shift to a pre-approval model was largely driven by a desire to avoid the “post-facto” disputes that characterized the legacy RAC.¹²

Fraud Prevention Mechanisms

To maintain the integrity of the program while benefiting SMBs, the state can implement the following guardrails:

Mandatory Technical Interviews: For any claim exceeding $50,000, the IEDA should conduct a brief, standardized technical interview with the business’s lead engineer or scientist.²⁸ This ensures that the work being claimed is truly “technological in nature” and not merely routine adaptation or aesthetic design.²
Data-Driven Audit Selection: By utilizing the “Innovation Iowa” portal data, the IDR can use machine-learning algorithms to identify anomalies in wage-to-research ratios or supply costs.²⁹ This allows the state to focus its audit resources on high-risk claims rather than auditing every small business.
Tiered Clawback Provisions: The IEDA contract should include specific “clawback” triggers. If a business receives a credit but then experiences a mass layoff or moves its research operations out of the state within three years, the state should have the right to recover the credit on a sliding scale.⁷ This ensures that the state’s investment translates into long-term economic stability for Iowa workers.

Economic and Cost-Benefit Analysis

A strategic evaluation of the IEDA pre-approval requirement requires a balance between the “cost of the credit” and the “cost of inaction.” Critics of R&D credits often point to their high fiscal cost—$71 million in FY 2021—and mixed results in some regression models.¹ However, a more nuanced analysis reveals that when these programs are targeted and accessible, they produce a significant return on investment through the “multiplier effect.”

The Initial Outlay and Future Benefits

The implementation of the proposed “Safe Harbor” and digital portal would require an initial investment. We estimate the one-time development cost for an integrated IEDA/IDR portal at $2.5 million, with an annual maintenance cost of $400,000. Additionally, the IEDA would require an initial budget of $750,000 for small business outreach and technical training.

Table 3: Administrative Implementation Costs

Investment Category	Initial Cost (Year 1)	Ongoing Annual Cost
Digital Portal Development	$2,500,000	$400,000
IEDA Staff/Technical Training	$750,000	$250,000
SME Outreach & Education	$250,000	$100,000
Total Administrative Outlay	$3,500,000	$750,000

Paying for the Program Through Induced Investment

The $3.5 million initial cost is relatively modest when compared to the $40 million annual credit pool. The “future benefits” that pay for this program are found in the increased economic activity generated by research-intensive firms. National studies indicate that each $1 of R&D tax credit can generate more than $1 of additional R&D spending, with some estimates suggesting a multiplier of up to $3 in the manufacturing sector.²⁴

For Iowa, every $1 million in additional R&D spending supports approximately 17 high-skilled jobs in fields like engineering and biotechnology.²⁷ These workers pay state income taxes, consume local goods and services, and contribute to the property tax base. If the proposed administrative reforms increase SMB participation by just 10%, the resulting induced investment would generate more than enough additional tax revenue to cover the $750,000 annual administrative cost within three years.

The Importance of Policy Change and the Risk of Inaction

The State of Iowa stands at a crossroads. Its traditional economic engines—manufacturing and agriculture—are increasingly becoming technology-driven industries. To remain competitive, Iowa must not only produce innovative ideas but also provide a fertile environment for those ideas to be commercialized within the state.

The Consequences of Administrative Stagnation

If the IEDA pre-approval hurdle is not addressed, the negative consequences for the state could be severe:

Innovation Atrophy: Small, high-potential startups will simply stop claiming the credit, viewing the administrative cost as a “tax on innovation.” This leads to a decline in the state’s total R&D output.¹²
Consolidation of Benefits: The $40 million cap will be “captured” by a handful of large corporations that have the scale to manage the bureaucracy, leaving Iowa’s small business ecosystem without the resources it needs to scale.⁸
The Talent Exodus: Iowa currently ranks 47th in the nation for the retention of 25-29 year-olds with college degrees.³⁴ These young professionals are the primary drivers of R&D. If the state’s policy framework is seen as hostile or overly bureaucratic toward startups, this “brain drain” will only accelerate.³⁴

A Vision for a Smarter Innovation Policy

The transition to an IEDA-administered program provides a unique opportunity for the state to reinvent its relationship with the private sector. By moving away from a rigid, “permission-based” model toward a flexible, data-driven “collaboration” model, Iowa can ensure its incentives are both fiscally responsible and widely accessible.

The implementation of a Small Business Safe Harbor and a unified digital portal would signal to the global market that Iowa is not just open for business—it is open for innovation. It would allow the state to maintain its $40 million fiscal guardrail while ensuring that every dollar of that investment is used to empower the next generation of Hawkeye State entrepreneurs. The goal of economic development policy should be to reduce the distance between a new idea and its first commercial application. By streamlining the front-end administrative hurdle of the R&D credit, the Iowa government can fulfill its promise to be a true partner in the pursuit of progress.

Works Cited

Research Activities Tax Credit Tax Credits Program Evaluation …, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://revenue.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-01/Research%20Activities%20Tax%20Credit%20Evaluation%20Study%202021.pdf
R&D Tax Credit FAQs For Large and Small Businesses – BDO, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.bdo.com/insights/tax/r-d-tax-credit-faqs-for-large-and-small-businesses
Iowa R&D Tax Credits, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/iowa-r-d-tax-credits
Tax Credits For Startups In Iowa – Every.io, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.every.io/blog-post/tax-credits-startups-iowa
Corporate Income Tax Research and Development Credit – Florida Department of Revenue, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://taxapps.floridarevenue.com/CorporateTaxCreditRD/Instructions.aspx
Research Activities Credit (RAC) – Iowa Department of Revenue, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://revenue.iowa.gov/taxes/tax-guidance/tax-credits-deductions-exemption/research-activities-credit-rac
Iowa Overhauls Business Tax Incentives: What Companies Need to Know, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.brownwinick.com/insights/iowa-overhauls-business-tax-incentives-what-companies-need-to-know
Iowa’s research credit: Still funneling big dollars to big companies | Blog, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.commongoodiowa.org/blog/2024/02/28/iowas-research-credit-still-funneling-big-dollars-to-big-companies
How Iowa’s 2026 Incentive Changes Could Impact Business Decisions – DMA, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://dmainc.com/news-and-insights/iowa-incentive-changes-2026/
Iowa legislature approves bills to revamp state R&D credits, reduce aid for companies with mass layoffs or closures, and expand the retirement income exemption – Tax News Update, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://taxnews.ey.com/news/2025-1123-iowa-legislature-approves-bills-to-revamp-state-r-and-d-credits-reduce-aid-for-companies-with-mass-layoffs-or-closures-and-expand-the-retirement-income-exemption
Iowa Research and Development Tax Credit Program | Economic …, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://opportunityiowa.gov/business/financial-assistance/iowa-research-and-development-tax-credit-program
Iowa reshapes R&D tax credit program – RSM US, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://rsmus.com/insights/tax-alerts/2025/iowa-reshapes-r-d-tax-credit-program.html
Research and Development Tax Credit – Fiscal Topics – Iowa.gov, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/publications/FTNO/1544118.pdf
Small Business R&D Tax Credit: Eligibility, Expenses & How It Works – Ramp, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://ramp.com/blog/small-business-r-d-tax-credits
Step-by-Step guide to Completing the New R&D Tax Credit Form 6765 – TaxRobot, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://taxrobot.com/rd-tax-credit-form-6765-guide/
State R&D Tax Credits: Recent Updates and Impacts – Aprio, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.aprio.com/insights-events/state-rd-tax-credits-recent-updates-and-impacts-ins-article-tax/
A transparent and conservative approach to R&D tax credit fees – Swanson Reed, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
R&D Tax Credit Examples for Startups & Tech – Haven, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.usehaven.com/blog-posts/rd-tax-credit-examples
Iowa’s 2025 job growth lags behind post-pandemic years – Corridor Business Journal, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://corridorbusiness.com/iowas-2025-job-growth-lags-behind-post-pandemic-years/
Iowa Jobs and Labor Force Update – August 2025 – Common Sense Institute, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.commonsenseinstituteus.org/iowa/research/jobs-and-our-economy/iowa-jobs-and-labor-force-update-august-2025
6 States Just Changed Their R&D Tax Credit Rules: What Your Business Needs to Know, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/rd/6-states-just-changed-their-rd-tax-credit-rules-what-your-business-needs-to-know
Minnesota and the R&D Tax Credit – Swanson Reed, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/minnesota/
Instructions for Form 6765 (12/2025) | Internal Revenue Service, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i6765
Bad breaks: Why US tax policies put innovation at risk | Stanford …, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/bad-breaks-why-us-tax-policies-put-innovation-risk
Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit | How To Qualify, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://capstantax.com/research-development-tax-credit/
R&D tax credits guide for CPAs – ADP, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/r/r-and-d-tax-credit-guide-for-cpas.aspx
R&D Tax Credits: Driving American Innovation and Competitiveness, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.kajmst.com/articles/r-d-tax-credits-driving-american-innovation-and-competitiveness
Success rate of R&D tax credit audits – Swanson Reed, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/federal/faqs/success-rate-of-rd-tax-credit-audits/
Audit-Proofing Your Tax Credit Claims: Best Practices and Red Flags for 2026 – HRlogics, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://hrlogics.com/blog/audit-proofing-your-tax-credit-claims-best-practices-and-red-flags-for-2026
Claim Research Tax Credit with New Form 6765 – Moss Adams, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.mossadams.com/articles/2025/02/updated-form-6765-requires-more-detail
Preparing for an R&D Tax Credit Audit – Sensiba, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://sensiba.com/resources/insights/preparing-for-an-rd-tax-credit-audit/
The Hidden Cost of R&D Tax Changes on Innovation, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://innotechtoday.com/the-hidden-cost-of-rd-tax-changes-on-innovation/
Tax Incentives for Research & Development: Policy Design and Evidence – NBER, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c15156/c15156.pdf
Untitled – Iowa Business Council, acessado em março 17, 2026, https://www.iowabusinesscouncil.org/UserDocs/2026_competitive_dashboard.pdf

Notice & Disclaimer: The information is current as of July 30, 2026. This whitepaper is provided for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. It is strongly recommended that you seek professional legal or tax representation to understand how the Iowa R&D tax credit and any proposed policy changes would apply to specific business circumstances.