Optimizing the Delaware Research and Development Tax Credit: Addressing the Base Amount Calculation Complexity for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

1. Executive Summary

The state of Delaware has consistently sought to position itself as a global leader in fostering technological innovation and corporate growth. A primary mechanism for this support is the Delaware Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit, governed by the Delaware Code, Title 30, Subchapter VIII.¹ While the 2017 enactment of the Commitment to Innovation Act transformed the credit into a fully refundable incentive and removed the aggregate statewide fiscal cap, a significant structural hurdle remains for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs): the “base amount” calculation complexity.³ Under current statutes, SMBs must reconstruct up to four years of historical Delaware-apportioned gross receipts and qualified research expenses (QREs) to establish a baseline for credit eligibility.⁵ For young companies and startups—often characterized by rapid pivoting, lean administrative staff, and inconsistent early-stage record-keeping—this requirement functions as a significant barrier to entry, diverting critical resources away from technical development and toward forensic accounting.⁷

This whitepaper provides an exhaustive analysis of the base amount calculation’s impact on the Delaware innovation ecosystem. It details the administrative friction inherent in the current incremental model, analyzes the disproportionate burden placed on nascent enterprises, and proposes two primary legislative solutions: the implementation of a “Flat Rate Safe Harbor” and the adoption of a “Rolling Three-Year Simplified QRE Average” that decouples the credit from gross receipts data. Furthermore, the report outlines strategies for ensuring fiscal integrity and preventing fraud, while providing a cost-benefit analysis that frames these reforms as a high-yield investment in the state’s economic resilience. Failure to address these complexities risks ceding Delaware’s competitive advantage to regional peers that are aggressively simplifying their own incentive frameworks.

2. The Contextual Framework of Delaware’s R&D Incentive

To understand the specific issue of base amount complexity, it is necessary to contextualize the Delaware R&D tax credit within the broader state and federal incentive landscape. Delaware’s credit is designed to mirror the federal framework provided by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, but with several enhancements tailored to the state’s corporate population.¹

Statutory Evolution and the 2017 Pivot

The legislative architecture of the Delaware R&D credit underwent a fundamental transformation with the passage of the Commitment to Innovation Act.³ Before this shift, the state’s total R&D credit pool was capped at $5 million annually, leading to unpredictable pro-rata reductions for applicants whenever total claims exceeded the cap.⁴ Furthermore, the credit was strictly non-refundable, serving only as an offset against current-year Delaware corporate income tax liabilities.³ This created a “pre-revenue trap” where the most research-intensive startups could not benefit from the credit during their most critical years of capital consumption.¹⁰

The 2017 reforms removed the $5 million cap and made the credit fully refundable.⁴ This meant that if a company’s approved credit exceeded its tax liability, the Delaware Division of Revenue (DOR) would issue a cash refund for the difference.¹ This change established Delaware as one of the most attractive jurisdictions in the nation for early-stage life sciences, fintech, and advanced manufacturing firms.⁵

Credit Calculation Methodologies

Under 30 Del. C. § 2070, taxpayers are allowed to choose between two primary calculation methods on an annual basis. This election is independent of the method used for the federal R&D tax credit.¹

Table 1: Delaware Calculation Methodologies

Sources: ¹

Definition of Small to Medium-Sized Businesses (SMBs)

Delaware provides a specific “small business” enhancement to incentivize growth in the middle market. A small business is generally defined as a taxpayer with average annual gross receipts not exceeding the applicable threshold.¹ For 2025 and 2026, this threshold has been adjusted via Section 515 of Title 30 to approximately $31 million in average annual gross receipts over the prior three tax years.¹⁴ For entities meeting this definition, the credit rates double: from 10% to 20% under the incremental method, and from 50% to 100% of the apportioned federal credit under the simplified method.⁵

3. Defining the Policy Issue: Base Amount Calculation Complexity

The “base amount” is the technical foundation of the incremental R&D tax credit model. Its purpose is to ensure that the credit rewards increased innovation spending rather than subsidizing baseline activities that a company would have performed regardless of the incentive.⁷ However, the mechanics of calculating this amount create a substantial administrative burden for SMBs.

The Mechanics of the Base Amount Formula

Under the regular incremental method (Method A), the Delaware base amount is determined by multiplying a “fixed-base percentage” (FBP) by the average annual Delaware gross receipts for the four taxable years preceding the credit year.⁵

The mathematical representation of the base amount is as follows:

The Fixed-Base Percentage itself is a ratio derived from a historical “base period.” For established firms, this period is fixed between 1984 and 1988.⁷ For “startup” companies—those that did not have both gross receipts and QREs in at least three years during the 1980s—the FBP is determined by a complex statutory schedule.⁷

The Administrative Burden of Historical Reconstruction

The reliance on a four-year lookback for gross receipts and a potentially decades-old base period for the FBP creates three distinct layers of complexity for Delaware SMBs.

1. Delaware-Specific Apportionment: Unlike the federal R&D credit, which utilizes total domestic gross receipts, the Delaware credit requires “Delaware-apportioned” gross receipts.⁵ This requires companies to apply Delaware’s corporate apportionment rules (typically based on the destination of sales) to their historical revenue data.⁵ For a young company that has expanded rapidly across state lines, reconstructing the exact “Delaware nexus” for sales made three or four years ago is a forensic challenge.⁵
2. The “Startup” Progression Complexity: For companies founded after 1988, the FBP is not static. It begins at 3% and then transitions into a moving average of QREs and gross receipts.⁷

Table 2: Startup Progression of Fixed-Base Percentage

Sources: ⁷

3. The Inconsistency of Early-Stage Records: SMBs in their first five to seven years of operation often focus exclusively on product-market fit and technical milestones. Financial record-keeping is frequently outsourced or managed through basic software that may not capture the nuances of “Delaware-apportioned” receipts or categorize labor expenses according to the strict “Four-Part Test” required by the IRS and DOR.⁹ By the time these companies are large enough to benefit significantly from a refundable tax credit, the “base years” they must use for the calculation are often poorly documented, leading to “compliance dread” and a failure to claim the credit.⁸

The Disproportionate Impact on High-Growth SMBs

High-growth startups often experience “revenue spikes” that are not immediately matched by R&D spending, or vice versa.⁸ Because the base amount is tied to average gross receipts over the prior four years, a sudden increase in Delaware sales can artificially inflate the base amount in subsequent years.⁷ This creates a “success penalty” where the very companies that are scaling most effectively in Delaware find their R&D credit eligibility diminished because their “base” has risen faster than their ability to hire new research staff.⁸

Furthermore, the “50% Minimum Base Amount Rule” mandates that the base amount can never be less than 50% of the current year’s QREs.⁵ This effectively caps the incremental credit at 10% of total current QREs (for SMBs using the 20% rate), adding another layer of calculation that must be modeled to determine the most advantageous filing method.⁷

4. Practical Solution 1: Implementation of a “Flat Rate Safe Harbor” for Small Businesses

The most direct solution to the base amount calculation complexity is the creation of a “Safe Harbor” election for qualifying small businesses. This would allow SMBs to bypass the historical reconstruction of gross receipts and the FBP entirely.

Mechanism of the Safe Harbor

The Delaware Legislature should amend 30 Del. C. § 2070 to include a third calculation option (Method C). This method would allow a small business to claim a credit equal to a flat percentage of its total current-year Delaware QREs, regardless of its historical spending or revenue.²³

Based on effective credit rate modeling, a flat rate of 6% to 8% would be appropriate.⁸ This mirrors the “Startup Exception” in the federal ASC method, which allows companies with no prior QREs to claim a flat 6% of current-year expenses.⁸

Advantages for SMBs and the State

• Administrative Relief: By removing the need for 4-year historical data, the state immediately lowers the cost of compliance for SMBs. This reduces the reliance on contingency-fee-based tax consultants, ensuring that a higher percentage of the credit remains within the company to fund innovation.²⁵
• Audit Efficiency: The Delaware Division of Revenue would no longer need to audit historical gross receipts apportionment for small safe-harbor claims. Auditors could focus solely on whether the current year’s activities meet the Four-Part Test, significantly speeding up the approval and refund process.¹⁵
• Predictability for Founders: Founders could project their R&D tax refund with 100% certainty during their fiscal planning, which is essential for securing venture debt or managing “burn rates” in pre-profit stages.⁵

Table 3: Comparative Thresholds for Safe Harbor Eligibility

Sources: ⁸

5. Practical Solution 2: Transitioning to a Rolling Three-Year Simplified Average

A second solution, which retains the incremental nature of the credit but simplifies the data requirements, is to decouple the “base” from gross receipts entirely and move toward a Delaware-specific simplified average.

The Problem with the Current Method B

Currently, Delaware’s Method B (the simplified method) is tied to the federal ASC calculation.¹ While simpler than Method A, it still requires the taxpayer to calculate their federal credit and then apportion it back to Delaware.¹ This means that if a company’s federal record-keeping is flawed or if they are undergoing a federal audit, their Delaware credit is inherently at risk.⁵

The Proposed Mechanism: State-Only Simplified Credit

The state could implement a Delaware-specific simplified credit that uses a three-year rolling average of Delaware QREs as the base, with no gross receipts component.⁸

The formula would follow the federal ASC structure but apply it only to Delaware-sourced expenses:

Strategic Alignment with Regional Trends

This approach aligns Delaware with modern updates in states like Texas and California, which have recognized that gross receipts are an “unreliable and volatile” variable for innovation incentives.²³ By focusing solely on Delaware research spending, the state creates a “cleaner” incentive that rewards companies for creating high-tech jobs within the state’s borders, regardless of where their global or national sales are trending.⁵

6. Fraud and Wastage Mitigation in a Simplified Framework

Critics of tax simplification often argue that reducing documentation requirements increases the risk of fraudulent claims.¹⁵ However, the proposed solutions for Delaware would simplify the calculation while maintaining, or even strengthening, the qualitative substantiation of the research activities.

Implementing a “Pre-Certification” Portal for SMBs

To prevent wastage, Delaware should implement a “Digital Pre-Certification” process similar to the models used in Arizona and Hawaii.³⁰

• Electronic Intent Filing: SMBs would be required to file a brief project description and an “estimated QRE budget” by the end of their second fiscal quarter.³¹
• Automated Risk Scoring: The Division of Revenue can use data analytics to compare the proposed research against the company’s North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code. A software startup claiming $500,000 in “lab supplies” would trigger an immediate request for clarification before the credit is even claimed.¹⁵

Standardized Contemporaneous Documentation (SCD)

In exchange for using the Safe Harbor (Method C), SMBs should be required to maintain a “Standardized R&D Log” provided by the state.⁹ This digital log would require:

• Project Mapping: Linking payroll hours to specific business components.¹⁹
• Rights and Risks Affidavits: For contract research, a mandatory form confirming that the Delaware entity retains the “substantial rights” to the research and bears the “economic risk”.³³
• Experimental Proof: A requirement to upload at least one piece of contemporaneous evidence (e.g., a prototype photo, a testing log, or a version control snippet) for each major project.⁹

Post-Refund Statistical Audits

Because the Delaware credit is refundable, the state has a unique opportunity to conduct “look-back audits”.⁴ The Division of Revenue can issue the refund to maintain the company’s cash flow but retain the right to audit the SCD log within a three-year window.⁵ By utilizing a flat-rate safe harbor, the DOR reduces the technical difficulty of these audits, as the auditor no longer needs to debate the “correctness” of four-year-old gross receipt data and can focus entirely on whether the research was “technological in nature”.¹⁵

7. Cost Analysis and the Long-Term ROI Frame

The implementation of these reforms will involve an initial fiscal outlay in terms of foregone revenue and administrative setup. However, when framed within the context of Delaware’s long-term economic strategy, these costs are eclipsed by the potential for high-yield returns.

Initial Cost Outlay (Tax Expenditure)

• Revenue Impact: Transitioning SMBs to a flat 7% safe harbor may increase the total value of credits claimed by 15-20% as more companies become aware of the streamlined process and “compliance dread” is eliminated.¹¹
• Implementation Costs: The DOR would need to update the Delaware Taxpayer Portal and the “BUS-CRS” forms to accommodate the new Method C and SCD upload requirements.¹²

Framed Future Benefits (The ROI Model)

The primary “profit” for the State of Delaware from an R&D tax credit is not the tax collected on the research activity itself, but the “Innovation Multiplier” that follows.

• High-Wage Payroll Tax: R&D spending is ~70% wages. These high-income employees pay Delaware PIT and spend locally. (Immediate: 12–24 months)
• IP Retention: Companies that conduct R&D in DE are 60% more likely to keep their patents and HQ in the state. (Long-term: 5–10 years)
• Manufacturing Synergy: R&D frequently leads to in-state manufacturing or software deployment, driving Gross Receipts Tax. (Medium-term: 3–5 years)
• VC Attraction: A frictionless tax environment attracts out-of-state Venture Capital, increasing the state’s “Innovation Intensity.” (Medium-term: 3–7 years)

Sources: Based on ²⁴

The Cost of Inefficiency

Currently, a significant portion of Delaware’s R&D tax expenditure is “leaking” out of the innovation economy and into the pockets of high-priced tax consultants who specialize in base amount reconstruction.²⁵ By simplifying the calculation, the state ensures that a higher percentage of every tax dollar remains in the hands of engineers and scientists. This “efficiency gain” effectively pays for the program expansion by increasing the velocity of capital within the Delaware high-tech sector.³⁵

8. Importance of the Policy Change: Competitive Jurisdictional Analysis

Delaware does not operate in a vacuum. The “Base Amount Calculation Complexity” is a known weakness that regional competitors are already exploiting.

The Rise of Regional Rivals

Pennsylvania and Maryland have both recently updated their innovation incentive portfolios to target the very SMBs that Delaware seeks to attract.³⁹

• Pennsylvania: Offers a sellable/transferable credit that allows pre-profit startups to monetize their credits immediately on the open market.³⁹ They also use a simplified “ASC-style” base for all applicants.³⁹
• Maryland: While not refundable, Maryland’s Biotechnology Investment Incentive offers a 50% credit for investments in early-stage firms, directly competing for the same pool of “deep tech” founders.²⁷
• New Jersey: Provides a highly flexible “Tax Certificate Transfer Program” for tech and biotech firms, allowing them to sell unused R&D credits for 80% or more of their value.¹⁸

The “Friction-Free” Brand

Delaware’s primary brand in the business world is “Simplicity, Certainty, and Responsiveness”.²⁹ The Delaware Court of Chancery and the Division of Corporations are global benchmarks for administrative excellence.⁴⁴ A convoluted, four-year historical tax calculation that requires specialized consultants is “off-brand” for the state and undermines its reputation as the premier jurisdiction for business formation.¹⁷

Negative Consequences of Inaction

Failure to simplify the base amount calculation will lead to three primary negative outcomes for the Delaware economy.

1. The “SME Ceiling”: Many Delaware startups will continue to utilize the credit in their early years (when the fixed 3% FBP applies) but will abandon the program as they hit the complex “transition years” (Years 6–10).⁷ This creates a “growth ceiling” where mid-sized companies—the engines of job creation—are effectively taxed for scaling their research operations.⁸
2. Increased Audit Friction and Backlogs: As the state’s tech sector grows, the Division of Revenue will face an increasing number of complex R&D claims.⁴ Without a simplified safe harbor, DOR agents will spend thousands of man-hours debating historical gross receipt apportionments for $20,000 credits, a highly inefficient use of state resources.¹⁵
3. “Gazelle” Migration: High-growth “gazelle” companies are highly mobile. If the administrative cost of claiming a $100,000 refundable credit in Delaware requires $30,000 in consultant fees and 100 hours of staff time, these companies will naturally migrate their R&D centers to jurisdictions with simpler “flat rate” incentives like Texas or the new California model.²³

9. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Delaware Research and Development Tax Credit is a powerful economic engine, but its gears are currently clogged by the administrative sludge of the base amount calculation. For the state to maintain its 7th-place ranking (and move toward the top 3) in the Milken Institute’s State Technology and Science Index, it must modernize its incentive delivery.³⁷

The Delaware Legislature should prioritize the following actions:

• Adopt Method C: A 7% Flat-Rate Safe Harbor for SMBs with < $31M in average annual gross receipts.
• Modernize Method B: Decouple the simplified method from federal gross receipts and move toward a Delaware-specific rolling average of QREs.
• Digitize Verification: Implement a digital “SCD Log” and pre-certification portal to mitigate fraud while ensuring a rapid refund cycle for legitimate innovators.

By making these changes, Delaware will reaffirm its commitment to the innovation economy, ensuring that the state remains not just a place where the world incorporates, but where the world invents.

Works cited

1. 30 Delaware Code § 2070 (2025) – Amount of credit and applicable …, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://law.justia.com/codes/delaware/title-30/chapter-20/subchapter-viii/section-2070/
2. Income, Inheritance and Estate Taxes – Delaware Code Online, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://delcode.delaware.gov/title30/c020/sc08/index.html
3. Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credits for Smyrna, Delaware Businesses – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/delaware/case-studies/smyrna/
4. Delaware R&D Tax Credit | AndreTaxCo, PLLC, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.andretaxco.com/delaware-rdcredit
5. Delaware R&D Tax Credits – Strike Tax Advisory, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/delaware-r-d-tax-credits
6. State of Delaware, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://revenuefiles.delaware.gov/2025/BusinessTaxForms_Instructions/BUS-RDC_2025-01_PaperInteractive.pdf
7. Fixed-Base Percentage in Research Credit Calculations – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/federal/glossary/fixed-base-percentage/
8. Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) vs. Regular Credit: which is better? – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/federal/faqs/alternative-simplified-credit-asc-vs-regular-credit-which-is-better/
9. Delaware R&D Tax Credit Explained for Businesses – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/delaware/
10. Delaware R&D Tax Credit, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.delawarebio.org/resource/resmgr/custom_pages/why_delaware/rd_credit_fact_sheet.pdf
11. Delaware Businesses Research and Development Tax Credits – Endeavor Advisors, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.endeavoradvisors.com/delaware-rd-tax-credit/
12. Independent Election (of Federal Method) – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/delaware/glossary/independent-election/
13. R&D Benefits for DE Innovators Restored | DPP – Delaware Prosperity Partnership, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.choosedelaware.com/in-the-news/rd-benefits-for-de-innovators-restored/
14. Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credits for Dover, Delaware Businesses – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/delaware/case-studies/dover/
15. Audit techniques guide: Credit for Increasing Research Activities (i.e. Research Tax Credit) IRC § 41* – Research credit computation | Internal Revenue Service – IRS.gov, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.irs.gov/businesses/audit-techniques-guide-credit-for-increasing-research-activities-ie-research-tax-credit-irc-ss-41-research-credit-computation
16. How to Calculate R&D Tax Credits for Startups | Haven, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.usehaven.com/blog-posts/how-to-calculate-rd-tax-credit
17. Delaware Sales Tax and Why Companies Choose the State – Indinero, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.indinero.com/blog/delaware-other-states-corporation-taxes/
18. New Jersey R&D Tax Credits – Strike Tax Advisory, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/new-jersey-r-d-tax-credits
19. (R&D) tax credits, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.rdtaxcredit.co/
20. Delaware Tax Credit Schedule (CRS) – Division of Revenue – State …, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://revenue.delaware.gov/frequently-asked-questions/delaware-tax-credit-schedule-crs/
21. Base Amount and Fixed-Based Percentage for Incremental Research Credit, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://answerconnect.cch.com/topic/e1ab34ce7c66100097d490b11c18c9020a/base-amount-and-fixed-based-percentage-for-incremental-research-credit
22. R&D Tax Credit Calculation Methods – ADP, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/r/r-and-d-tax-credit-calculation-methods.aspx
23. What Changes Are Coming to the California R&D Tax Credit Calculation in 2025?, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://jlkrosenberger.com/what-changes-are-coming-to-the-california-rd-tax-credit-calculation-in-2025/
24. The Federal Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit – EveryCRSReport.com, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R48848.html
25. R&D Tax Credit & KIZ Services – FAQ – Exton, PA Accounting Firm, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.toronicpa.com/toronicpa.com/rd-tax-credit-faq.php
26. Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit | How To Qualify, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://capstantax.com/research-development-tax-credit/
27. Tax Credits For Startups In Delaware – 2025 – Every.io, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.every.io/blog-post/tax-credits-for-startups-in-delaware
28. Mid-Year State R&D Tax Credit Roundup: California, Texas and Minnesota Updates, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.withum.com/resources/mid-year-state-rd-tax-credit-roundup-california-texas-and-minnesota-updates/
29. Responsiveness to Industry Needs Boosts Delaware’s Appeal as Science, Manufacturing Location – Expansion Solutions, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.expansionsolutionsmagazine.com/responsiveness-to-industry-needs-boosts-delaware/
30. The 2025 Guide to State R&D Tax Credits | TaxTaker, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.taxtaker.com/blog/the-2025-guide-to-state-r-d-tax-credits
31. Tax Alert Articles – Sonora / Angels Camp CPA : Tax, Accounting & Audit Services, accessed on March 16, 2026, http://www.wecpas4u.com/taxalertarticles.php
32. Are R&D Tax Credits Available in Delaware? | See if You Qualify – KBKG, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.kbkg.com/research-tax-credit/delaware-rd-tax-credit
33. Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) Explained – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/federal/glossary/qualified-research-expenses-qres/
34. Research and development tax rebate: Boost Cash 2025 – OpStart, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.opstart.co/research-development-tax-rebate-guide/
35. Tax Credits and Small Firm R&D Spending – NBER, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20615/w20615.pdf
36. Tax Incentive Evaluation: Qualified Law Enforcement Donation Tax Credit | Georgia Department of Audits & Accounts, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/33157
37. Delaware: Where the World Chooses to Do Business – Expansion Solutions, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.expansionsolutionsmagazine.com/delaware-where-the-world-chooses-to-do-business/
38. The New Section 174 : How the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Supercharges R&D Tax Savings – Boast.ai, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.boast.ai/en-ca/blog/what-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-means-for-your-rd-tax-credit-strategy
39. Pennsylvania R&D Tax Credits, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/search?q=Pennsylvania
40. Economy – Maryland State Archives, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/economy/html/economy.html
41. Pennsylvania R&D Tax Credit Explained for Businesses – Swanson Reed, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/search?q=Pennsylvania
42. DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND NEW YORK BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT TAX INCENTIVES – C G A, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.cga.ct.gov/2015/rpt/2015-R-0018.htm
43. New Jersey R&D Tax Credit – AndreTaxCo, PLLC, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.andretaxco.com/new-jersey-rdcredit
44. Delaware vs Maryland LLC Formation Comparison (2026) – NCH, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://nchinc.com/compare-your-state/delaware/vs-maryland
45. How to Start a Business in Delaware – Homebase, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://www.joinhomebase.com/start-a-business/delaware
46. Massachusetts is the Best State for Technology and Science, says Milken Institute, accessed on March 16, 2026, https://milkeninstitute.org/content-hub/news-releases/massachusetts-best-state-technology-and-science-says-milken-institute