The Virginia Innovation Mandate: Modernizing the Geographic Nexus Requirement for Research and Development Tax Credits to Empower Small and Medium Enterprises

1. Introduction

The Commonwealth of Virginia stands as a preeminent hub for technological advancement and industrial innovation within the United States. Historically, the state’s economic landscape has been defined by its proximity to the federal apparatus, a highly educated workforce, and a strategic commitment to fostering private-sector research and development (R&D). However, as the global paradigm for technical collaboration and laboratory infrastructure shifts toward a decentralized, talent-centric model, certain statutory rigidities within the Virginia tax code have begun to create unintended obstacles for the very businesses they were designed to support. Central to these challenges is the “Strict Geographic Nexus Requirement,” a policy mandate that necessitates 100 percent of qualified research activities to be conducted physically within the Commonwealth to qualify for state-level R&D tax credits. While this requirement was originally intended to ensure that taxpayer-funded incentives directly benefit the Virginia economy, its absolute nature now serves as a functional penalty for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In an era characterized by remote technical talent and highly specialized, cross-border laboratory partnerships, the current 100 percent threshold increasingly acts as a barrier to scaling Virginia’s most promising innovation-led companies. This whitepaper provides a comprehensive analysis of the existing R&D tax credit framework, the operational frictions generated by the geographic nexus rule, and a strategic roadmap for legislative reform that balances economic protectionism with the realities of modern technical experimentation.

2. The Architectural Framework of Virginia’s Research and Development Incentives

To evaluate the impact of the geographic nexus requirement, it is essential first to dissect the bifurcated structure of Virginia’s R&D tax incentives. The Commonwealth maintains two primary credit regimes: the Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit (RDC), which is specifically tailored for smaller firms and startups, and the Major Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit (MRD), aimed at larger enterprises with significant capital outlays. Both programs are governed by the same strict geographic standards, but the functional impact of these standards varies significantly based on a company’s size and resources.

The Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit (RDC) for SMEs

The RDC is the cornerstone of Virginia’s support for its startup and small business ecosystem. Eligibility is restricted to taxpayers whose qualified research and development expenses (QREs) for the taxable year do not exceed $5 million. For the vast majority of Virginia’s emerging tech firms, the RDC represents a lifeline, primarily because it is a refundable credit. This means that even if a pre-revenue startup has zero state income tax liability, the Commonwealth provides a direct cash refund, injecting vital working capital back into the firm’s development cycle.

Under the current statutory structure, as amended by House Bill 1518 in 2024, the RDC offers a base credit of 15 percent on the first $300,000 of Virginia QREs, or a 20 percent credit if the research is conducted in conjunction with a Virginia public or private institution of higher education. The total annual pool of funding for the RDC was recently increased from $7.77 million to $15.77 million, signaling a strong legislative preference for supporting smaller, more agile innovators. Despite this increased funding, the “all or nothing” nature of the geographic nexus remains a critical hurdle for SMEs that must often look outside the Commonwealth’s borders to find the specific expertise or equipment necessary to solve complex technical problems.

The Major Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit (MRD)

In contrast, the MRD serves larger corporations with QREs exceeding the $5 million annual threshold. While the MRD is non-refundable, it offers a 10-year carryforward provision for any unused credits, allowing established firms to offset future tax liabilities. Recent legislative changes have shifted the MRD to a step-rate reimbursement structure: 10 percent for the first $1 million in QREs (calculated as the difference between current-year expenses and 50 percent of the three-year average), and 5 percent for expenses exceeding $1 million. To reallocate resources toward the SME-focused RDC, the aggregate annual cap for the MRD was reduced from $24 million to $16 million in 2024.

Table 1: Virginia R&D Tax Credit Framework

Data compiled from: ²

3. The Strict Geographic Nexus Requirement: Origin and Mechanism

The “Strict Geographic Nexus Requirement” is not merely a preference for local activity; it is an absolute statutory mandate. Both Va. Code § 58.1-439.12:08 and § 58.1-439.12:11 explicitly define “Virginia qualified research” as qualified research (as defined by IRC § 41) that is conducted specifically within the Commonwealth.¹

The Four Determinative Factors of Nexus

The Virginia Department of Taxation utilizes a multi-factor test to determine whether an R&D activity meets the geographic nexus requirement. In adopting guidelines, the Department considers the following specific criteria ²:

• The Location of Performance: The physical site where the research activity, experimentation, and technical analysis are actually conducted.
• The Business Domicile or Residence: The location of the taxpayer (or taxpayers) conducting the research, with a preference for firms headquartered or primarily operating in Virginia.
• The Location of Supply Consumption: Where the materials, chemicals, prototypes, and other supplies used in the R&D process are utilized and exhausted.
• Other Relevant Factors: Any additional metrics that the Department deems necessary to ensure the research is anchored in the state.

This framework creates a binary outcome for Virginia SMEs. If a research project involves a “business component” that requires a three-week testing phase at a specialized laboratory in Maryland or requires the hiring of a remote technical lead residing in North Carolina, the entirety of the expenses associated with that out-of-state component—including wages, supplies, and contract fees—is statutorily disqualified from the state credit.¹

The Technical Context of Qualifying Research Expenses (QREs)

The financial definition of what constitutes a “qualified” expense follows federal standards but remains subject to the Virginia geographic filter. QREs generally include ¹:

• Wages and Salaries: Paid to employees directly performing, supervising, or supporting qualified research. Crucially, if the employee performs the work from a home office in a neighboring state, their wages are excluded from the Virginia QRE calculation.²
• Supplies: Costs for tangible materials and equipment consumed during the research process, provided they are utilized within Virginia.¹
• Contract Research Expenses: Payments to third-party consultants or organizations, typically capped at 65 percent of the actual cost for general contractors or 75 percent for research organizations like universities.⁴

Under the current 100 percent rule, Virginia SMEs face an administrative and financial “cliff.” For a small firm with a $1 million R&D budget, moving even 10 percent of that budget to an out-of-state specialized facility doesn’t just reduce their credit by 10 percent; it often creates an accounting complexity that results in the exclusion of all related costs, effectively penalizing the company for seeking the most efficient or advanced technical path.¹²

4. The SME Penalty: Dissecting the Functional Impact on Small Businesses

The strict geographic nexus requirement disproportionately affects small to medium enterprises, creating a structural disadvantage that larger corporations are better equipped to circumvent through sophisticated tax planning and cost-segregation strategies. For an SME, the “Strict Nexus” rule introduces three primary operational frictions: the remote talent trap, the specialized infrastructure barrier, and the administrative burden of precise geographic tracking.

The Remote Technical Talent Trap

Virginia is home to the second-largest cybersecurity industry and the highest concentration of tech talent in the nation.¹⁷ However, the post-pandemic evolution of the labor market toward hybrid and remote work models has decoupled the most specialized talent from specific geographic zip codes. An SME based in Blacksburg or Richmond may find that the leading global expert in a specific niche of machine learning or aerospace propulsion resides in Massachusetts or Maryland.

Under the current Virginia mandate, hiring this expert remotely immediately disqualifies their wages from the state R&D credit.¹ For an SME operating on thin margins, this makes out-of-state talent effectively 15 to 20 percent more expensive than Virginia-based talent.³ This forces small firms into a difficult choice: hire a less qualified candidate who is willing to relocate to Virginia or pay a significant premium to access the best technical mind for the job. This “talent trap” limits the technical agility of Virginia’s startup sector and slows the pace of innovation within the Commonwealth.¹⁷

The Specialized Infrastructure and Lab Space Barrier

Modern R&D frequently requires access to capital-intensive, specialized infrastructure that is not always available within Virginia’s borders. Examples include high-energy particle accelerators, specific clean-room environments for semiconductor fabrication, or specialized marine testing facilities. While Virginia has made significant investments in university research centers, gaps in the state’s industrial infrastructure remain.⁹

When an SME must utilize a laboratory in a neighboring state for a discrete phase of its research, the 100 percent nexus requirement acts as a direct financial disincentive. If the testing is integral to the “business component” under the federal Four-Part Test, the entire cost of the testing phase—and potentially the wages of the Virginia employees who travel out-of-state to oversee it—is lost for credit purposes.¹ This discourages SMEs from seeking the most rigorous testing or the most advanced equipment if that equipment happens to be located just across state lines.

Comparative Administrative Burden

Larger corporations often maintain dedicated tax departments capable of navigating the complex nuances of “apportioned” research across multiple states.²¹ For an SME, however, the burden of documenting that 100 percent of every dollar spent on a research project was exhausted within the Commonwealth can be prohibitive. The requirement for contemporaneous documentation of employee time by project and by location adds a layer of non-technical overhead that detracts from the actual work of innovation.⁷

5. Comparative Policy Landscapes: Virginia vs. Competing Jurisdictions

Virginia’s 100 percent geographic nexus requirement is increasingly an outlier when compared to the standards adopted by competing states and the federal government. A look at neighboring Maryland, the innovative life sciences hub of Massachusetts, and the federal IRC Section 41 standard reveals a significant shift toward more flexible “economic presence” models.

The Federal “Substantially All” Standard (IRC § 41)

The federal R&D tax credit, which Virginia utilizes as its base definition, employs a “Substantially All” rule. Under IRC § 41(d), an activity qualifies if “substantially all”—generally interpreted as 80 percent or more—of the research activities constitute elements of a process of experimentation.¹⁶ While the federal credit is restricted to research performed within the United States, it does not mandate that the work be performed in any specific state. This 80 percent threshold provides a critical “buffer” for technical deviations and administrative errors, a buffer that Virginia’s 100 percent rule explicitly denies.¹⁶

Maryland’s Regional Flexibilty

Maryland, Virginia’s most direct competitor for tech talent in the National Capital Region, offers a similar R&D tax credit structure but has historically been more aggressive in its small business protections.²³ Maryland allocates a $3.5 million specific set-aside for small businesses within its $12 million annual credit pool.⁵ More importantly, the Maryland Department of Commerce and Department of Revenue have increasingly moved toward “economic nexus” standards that recognize the cross-border nature of the DMV (DC, Maryland, Virginia) workforce.²¹ Maryland’s “Growth R&D Tax Credit,” which equals 10 percent of QREs in excess of a base amount, is designed to reward firms that are scaling, even if their talent pool occasionally crosses state lines.⁵

The Massachusetts “Two-Thirds” Threshold

Massachusetts, widely recognized as a global leader in life sciences R&D, utilizes a “receipts test” and an “expenditures test” to determine eligibility for its research and development corporation status.²⁵ To qualify, more than two-thirds (approximately 66.7 percent) of a corporation’s Massachusetts-sourced expenditures must be allocable to research and development activities conducted within the state.²⁵ This threshold is significantly more accommodating than Virginia’s 100 percent requirement, allowing firms to engage in necessary out-of-state technical activities without jeopardizing their entire state-level credit eligibility.

Table 2: Regional Geographic Nexus Comparison

Note: Some small businesses can apply federal credits to payroll tax. Data compiled from: ⁴

6. Proposed Solution A: Adoption of the “Substantially All” 80/20 Rule

The most practical and immediate solution available to the Virginia General Assembly is the adoption of a “Substantially All” geographic standard. This would involve amending the state code to align Virginia’s geographic threshold with the 80 percent threshold already utilized by the IRS for technical qualification.¹⁶

Mechanism of the 80/20 Standard

Under this proposed framework, an SME’s research project would qualify as “Virginia qualified research” if at least 80 percent of the technical activities and expenses related to that business component were conducted within the Commonwealth. If the 80 percent threshold is met, the taxpayer would be entitled to claim 100 percent of the project’s costs (including the 20 percent of ancillary out-of-state work) as Virginia QREs.

This change would functionally eliminate the “Remote Talent Trap.” A Virginia-based firm with a team of five researchers—four based in Richmond and one remote expert based in Maryland—would easily meet the 80 percent threshold. This allows the firm to hire the best possible talent without losing the fiscal benefit of the state R&D credit. It also provides a necessary buffer for firms that must occasionally use out-of-state testing facilities for discrete phases of a larger project.

Technical and Legislative Implementation

To implement this, the General Assembly would need to amend Va. Code §§ 58.1-439.12:08 and 58.1-439.12:11 to replace the phrase “conducted in the Commonwealth” with “substantially all of which is conducted in the Commonwealth,” specifically defining “substantially all” as 80 percent of the total qualified expenses for that business component. This alignment with federal terminology would also reduce the administrative burden on the Department of Taxation, as they could rely on existing federal guidelines and judicial precedent regarding the definition of “substantially all”.²⁰

7. Proposed Solution B: The Specialized Infrastructure and Regional Reciprocity (SIRR) Carve-Out

A more targeted alternative is the creation of the Specialized Infrastructure and Regional Reciprocity (SIRR) carve-out. This policy would maintain the 100 percent requirement for standard R&D activities but allow for specific exceptions based on infrastructure necessity and regional workforce dynamics.

Components of the SIRR Framework

• Specialized Equipment Exception: Expenses incurred for the use of specialized laboratory equipment or testing facilities that are not available within the Commonwealth would be treated as “Virginia qualified research” expenses, provided the project is managed and directed by a Virginia-domiciled entity.
• DMV Workforce Reciprocity: Recognizing the unique nature of the National Capital Region, the SIRR carve-out would allow wages paid to technical employees residing in Maryland or the District of Columbia to qualify as Virginia QREs, provided they are employed by a firm with its principal place of business in Virginia and spend a minimum of 20 percent of their time at a Virginia-based facility.

This approach addresses the most acute pain points for Virginia SMEs—access to non-local equipment and the regional mobility of tech talent—without broadly lowering the geographic threshold for all expenditures. It ensures that the Commonwealth remains the primary beneficiary of the R&D investment while acknowledging that Virginia is part of an interconnected mid-Atlantic innovation hub.

8. Implementation and Safeguards: Ensuring Accountability and Preventing Waste

A critical concern for any liberalized tax credit policy is the risk of fraud or “incentive shopping,” where firms might claim credits for activities that provide little true benefit to the Commonwealth. To mitigate these risks, the implementation of a more flexible nexus requirement must be paired with robust, modern oversight mechanisms.

Leveraging AI and Data Analytics for Audit Efficiency

The Department of Taxation should adopt modern, AI-driven audit tools to verify geographic nexus.²⁷ Modern fraud prevention requires more than just checking receipt amounts; it requires forensic document analysis and metadata verification.²⁷

• Forensic Document Authentication: Systems can analyze the metadata of digital research logs and supply invoices to detect inconsistencies in font rendering or properties that indicate a file was generated by a design tool rather than a vendor’s point-of-sale system.²⁷
• Duplicate Image Fingerprinting: AI can analyze the actual visual “fingerprint” of receipt images submitted by SMEs to ensure that the same supply expenses are not being claimed across multiple projects, different tax years, or by different entities entirely.²⁷
• Transactional Card Feed Reconciliation: The most effective defense against “ghost” expenses is reconciling a company’s credit card or bank feed directly with its R&D claims. If a receipt’s timestamp or merchant category does not align with immutable bank data, the system flags it for review.²⁷

Strengthening Internal Controls for SME Claimants

For small businesses claiming the refundable RDC, the government could mandate a simplified but rigorous Internal Control Certification. This would require the following ²⁸:

• CPA Attestation: For credits exceeding a certain threshold (e.g., $30,000), a certified public accountant must certify the geographic performance of the research.
• Separate Authorization and Record-Keeping: To prevent collusion, different individuals within the SME must be responsible for approving R&D expenses and maintaining the technical project logs.
• Clawback Provisions: Statutory language should ensure that any credit awarded based on fraudulent geographic claims is subject to immediate recapture, with significant penalties and interest.³⁰

Table 3: Recommended Anti-Fraud Controls

Data source: ²

9. Cost Analysis: Investing in the “Innovation Dividend”

When considering the fiscal impact of reforming the geographic nexus, it is vital to shift the focus from the immediate “cost” of the tax credit to the long-term “Innovation Dividend” it generates for the Commonwealth. Research by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) indicates that Virginia’s current R&D incentives are relatively small, totaling only 0.15 percent of overall R&D spending in the state over the last decade.⁶

Initial Outlay and the Aggregate Cap

The immediate fiscal impact of adopting an 80/20 rule would likely be an increase in the number of SMEs applying for the RDC. However, the Commonwealth’s exposure is strictly limited by the aggregate annual caps of $15.77 million for the RDC and $16 million for the MRD.¹⁰ If the pool of applicants increases due to more flexible rules, the Department of Taxation simply uses its existing proration mechanism—dividing the limit by the total approved credits—to determine the percentage each taxpayer receives.² Therefore, the total state outlay remains constant while the impact and utility of the credit for the most innovative firms are significantly enhanced.

The Long-term ROI of SME Growth

The true value of R&D incentives lies in their ability to anchor high-growth companies to the state. The economic multiplier effect for technical industries is among the highest of any sector.³⁵

• Preservation of the Corporate Tax Base: SMEs that are allowed to scale using a flexible talent and infrastructure model are less likely to relocate to Boston or Austin during their “growth” phase. Retaining these firms ensures a permanent 6 percent corporate income tax stream for decades.¹¹
• High-Wage Income Tax Retention: Virginia’s personal income tax is its primary revenue source. By allowing a Richmond-based SME to hire one remote expert in Maryland while keeping its other 20 employees in Virginia, the Commonwealth preserves the income tax revenue from those 20 Virginia-based high-wage roles that might otherwise be lost if the company relocated to a more flexible state.¹⁸
• Venture Capital Synergy: Institutional investors are more attracted to Virginia-based startups that have the freedom to access the best technical talent regardless of geography. An increase in private equity investment ($15B was spent on business R&D in Virginia in 2021) generates additional indirect tax revenue through increased employment and capital expenditure.⁹

Table 4: Projected Multiplier and ROI Table

Data extrapolated from: ¹⁹

10. The Importance of Policy Change: Addressing the Cost of Inaction

The decision to maintain or reform the 100 percent geographic nexus requirement is not a neutral one. In the hyper-competitive landscape of global innovation, standing still is equivalent to moving backward. The cost of inaction is marked by a “slow-motion” exodus of Virginia’s technical base.

The Looming Sunset and Competitive Erosion

Virginia’s R&D tax credits are currently in a state of precariousness. Despite efforts in the 2025 General Assembly session to extend the credits (HB 1969), no legislation was passed, meaning that for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, no state R&D credits will be available.¹¹ While pre-2025 credits can still be claimed or carried forward, the absence of an ongoing incentive program is a significant blow to the state’s economic development strategy.¹¹

Failure to reinstate the credits with modernized geographic rules will make Virginia significantly less competitive than states like Maryland or Massachusetts, which offer robust, ongoing programs.⁵ Without these incentives, businesses will naturally reconsider locating or expanding their research operations within the state, leading to a deceleration in innovation and economic growth.

The Risk of “Innovation Silos”

By maintaining a strict 100 percent nexus, Virginia effectively encourages its SMEs to operate in an “innovation silo.” This discourages firms from collaborating with out-of-state universities or specialized industrial partners, even when such collaboration is necessary for technical success. This inward-looking policy is antithetical to the nature of modern scientific discovery, which relies on the synthesis of diverse technical inputs from across the global ecosystem.

Preventing “Brain Drain”

Virginia invests billions in its world-class higher education system.¹⁷ However, if Virginia-based SMEs cannot scale because of restrictive tax policies, the Commonwealth’s top graduates will look to relocate to other states that offer more vibrant, technically flexible startup environments. The R&D credit is a primary tool for anchoring high-tier talent to the Virginia economy.¹⁶

11. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The transition from a 100 percent geographic nexus requirement to a “Substantially All” (80/20) standard is not merely a tax adjustment; it is a strategic necessity for the preservation and expansion of the Virginia innovation economy. By modernizing the state’s tax code to reflect the realities of the remote workforce and the decentralized nature of laboratory infrastructure, the Commonwealth can empower its SMEs to reach their full technical and commercial potential.

The following roadmap is recommended for the 2026 Virginia General Assembly:

• Immediate Reinstatement and Extension: Pass legislation to permanently extend the Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit (RDC) and the Major Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit (MRD), removing the January 1, 2025 sunset date.¹¹
• Nexus Modernization: Amend Va. Code §§ 58.1-439.12:08 and 58.1-439.12:11 to adopt the 80 percent “Substantially All” rule for geographic performance, aligning the state with federal IRC § 41 standards.¹⁶
• Investment in Integrity: Allocate a portion of the Department of Taxation’s budget to implement AI-driven metadata analysis and transactional reconciliation tools to prevent fraud while reducing the manual audit burden on small businesses.²⁷
• Specialized Infrastructure Carve-Out: Create a specific exemption for the use of out-of-state specialized research equipment when comparable facilities are unavailable within the Commonwealth.

Through these reforms, Virginia can ensure that it remains the premier destination for the technical pioneers of the twenty-first century. The initial fiscal outlay required to support these changes will be repaid many times over through the retention of high-wage jobs, the attraction of venture capital, and the long-term growth of a diversified, innovation-led corporate tax base. The goal of Virginia’s policy must be to nurture the seeds of innovation, regardless of where the specific technical expert or laboratory equipment might happen to reside, so long as the intellectual and economic heart of the enterprise remains firmly beating within the Commonwealth.

Obras citadas

1. Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit … – Virginia Tax, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.tax.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/Research_and_Development_Expenses_Tax_Credit_Guidelines.pdf
2. § 58.1-439.12:11. Major research and development expenses tax …, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title58.1/chapter3/section58.1-439.12:11/
3. § 58.1-439.12:08. Research and development expenses tax credit – Virginia Law, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title58.1/chapter3/section58.1-439.12:08/
4. Virginia R&D Tax Credit Services – TaxTaker, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.taxtaker.com/rd-tax-credit/virginia
5. The Virginia And Maryland R&D Tax Credits – Tri-Merit, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://tri-merit.com/latest-updates/the-virginia-maryland-rd-tax-credits-refundable-state-credit-incentivizes-startups-and-small-businesses/
6. Science and Technology Incentives – National Conference of State Legislatures, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Fiscal/evaluationDB/ScienceandTechnologyIncentives.pdf
7. Virginia R&D Tax Credit Guide – Source Advisors, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://sourceadvisors.com/map/rd-tax-credit/virginia/
8. Virginia R&D Tax Credit Explained for Businesses – Swanson Reed, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/virginia/
9. RD142 (Published 2023) – Science and Technology Incentives: Economic Development Incentives Evaluation Series – June 13, 2022, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://rga.lis.virginia.gov/Published/2023/RD142
10. 24-65 | Virginia Tax, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.tax.virginia.gov/laws-rules-decisions/legislative-summaries/24-65
11. Virginia R&D Tax Credit: 2025 Sunset Implications and 2026 Outlook | Cherry Bekaert, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.cbh.com/insights/articles/virginia-rd-tax-credit-changes-impact-on-businesses/
12. 2024 Form MRD – Application for Major Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit – Virginia Tax, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.tax.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/taxforms/credits-subtractions-and-deductions/2024/mrd-2024.pdf
13. LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1518 > 2024 session, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://legacylis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?241+sum+HB1518S
14. Virginia R&D Tax Credits – Strike Tax Advisory, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.striketax.com/state-rd-credits/virginia-r-d-tax-credits
15. 2024 Form RDC – Application for Research and Development Expenses Tax Credit – Virginia Tax, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.tax.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/taxforms/credits-subtractions-and-deductions/2024/rdc-2024.pdf
16. Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit – Association of American Universities (AAU), fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU%20Files/Key%20Issues/Taxation%20%26%20Finance/RD-Tax-Credit-FINAL.pdf
17. Virginia Economic Review: First Quarter 2025 by vedpvirginia – Issuu, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://issuu.com/vedpvirginia/docs/virginia_economic_review_first_quarter_2025
18. GO Virginia Region 9 Compendium of Evaluation Criteria, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.dhcd.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/Docx/gova/region-nine/region-9-growth-diversification-plan.pdf
19. Building on Virginia’s Research and Development Momentum, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.virginiaworks.com/_docs/Publications/Press-Releases-and-Reports/PDF/FeatureArticle.pdf
20. Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credits for Milledgeville, Georgia Businesses – Swanson Reed, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.swansonreed.com/research-tax-credit/georgia/case-studies/milledgeville/
21. What Creates Nexus in DC, Maryland, and Virginia – Thompson Greenspon, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.tgccpa.com/what-creates-nexus-in-dc-maryland-and-virginia/
22. Guide to Incentives 2024 by vedpvirginia – Issuu, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://issuu.com/vedpvirginia/docs/vedp_guide_to_incentives_marketing_v2_1_
23. Are R&D Tax Credits Available in Maryland? | See if You Qualify – KBKG, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.kbkg.com/research-tax-credit/maryland-rd-tax-credit
24. Research & Development Tax Credits by State – Abdo, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://abdosolutions.com/research-development-tax-credits-by-state/
25. 830 CMR 64H.6.4: Research and Development – Mass.gov, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.mass.gov/regulations/830-CMR-64h64-research-and-development
26. MLSC Tax Incentives Program: Eligibility, Calculation & More | Cherry Bekaert, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.cbh.com/insights/articles/2025-mlsc-tax-incentives-eligibility-calculation-more/
27. Expense Receipt Best Practices: 2026 Rules & Fraud Prevention Guide – Emburse, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.emburse.com/resources/expense-receipt-best-practices-guide
28. Enhancing Internal Controls to Prevent Fraud in Journal Entries | Lumsden McCormick CPA, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://lumsdencpa.com/blog/view/enhancing-internal-controls-to-prevent-fraud-in-journal-entries/
29. Strengthening internal controls to prevent fraud – Wolters Kluwer, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/strengthening-internal-controls-prevent-fraud
30. Grant Compliance: Best Practices for Oversight and Risk Management – Anchin, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.anchin.com/articles/grant-compliance-best-practices-for-oversight-and-risk-management/
31. Bill Text: VA SB1369 | 2025 | Regular Session | Comm Sub – LegiScan, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://legiscan.com/VA/text/SB1369/id/3118133
32. New Jersey Legislature, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2020/A4/bill-text?f=PL20&n=156_
33. Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Colorado: Single subject. This act concerns intangible personal property rights in a, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://leg.colorado.gov/initiative_files/3270/download
34. Program Integrity: The Antifraud Playbook | CFO.gov, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.cfo.gov/assets/files/Interactive-Treasury-Playbook.pdf
35. New NVTC Report: Virginia Data Centers Drive $40 Billion in Statewide Economic Impact, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-nvtc-report-virginia-data-centers-drive-40-billion-in-statewide-economic-impact-302702061.html
36. VIRGINIA COMBINED STATE PLAN PYs 24-27, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://virginiacareerworks.com/wp-content/uploads/Approved-WIOA-CSP-Virginia_PYs_2024-2027.pdf
37. Guide to Incentives – Virginia Economic Development Partnership, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://www.vedp.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/VEDP_Guide%20To%20Incentives_June2019.pdf
38. An Opportunity for Economic Growth – Virginia Academy of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, fecha de acceso: marzo 18, 2026, https://vasem.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/VASEM_AerospaceinVirginia2017.pdf