Analysis of Rental or Lease Costs of Computers (Hawaii) in Context of the Research Activities Tax Credit (HRS §235-110.91)

I. Executive Summary: Definition and Immediate Compliance Focus

1.01 Statutory Definition

Rental or Lease Costs of Computers constitute a Qualified Research Expense (QRE) under the Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA), HRS §235-110.91, if paid or incurred by a Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) for the right to use computing equipment in the conduct of qualified research.1 Critically, to qualify for the Hawaii credit, these costs must be attributable to leased equipment used exclusively for qualified research activities conducted physically in Hawaii.1

1.02 Contextual Overview

The expense category of rental or lease costs of computers is classified as an element of “in-house research expenses” under both federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41 and the adopting Hawaii statute. While the federal framework generally focuses on the nexus to qualified research activities (QRA), the State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) and Department of Taxation (DoTax) guidance imposes stringent sourcing and utilization requirements that exceed the standard federal rules.1 Specifically, the mandate for leased computers to be used exclusively in Hawaii R&D activities is the most significant point of compliance divergence.1 This exclusive use mandate means that QHTBs cannot apportion the cost of leased computers used for both research and non-research administrative functions; failure to demonstrate 100% exclusive use in R&D activities within Hawaii results in the total disqualification of the entire lease cost for TCRA purposes.1 The high level of precision required in documenting this expense category is essential for audit defense, particularly given the administrative constraints imposed by the statewide credit cap.3

II. The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) Foundational Framework

2.01 Governing Statute and Regulatory Authority

The Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities (TCRA) is authorized by Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §235-110.91.5 This credit serves as a substantial incentive for QHTBs to invest in innovative research and development conducted within the state.1 The credit is highly advantageous as it is refundable against Hawaii income tax.1 Claimants must navigate compliance through two state agencies: initial certification regarding eligibility and the credit amount is managed by DBEDT, and the final credit is claimed through DoTax using Form N-346.1

2.02 Qualified High Technology Business (QHTB) Eligibility

Accessing the TCRA, and thus qualifying for the computer lease QRE, is restricted to Qualified High Technology Businesses (QHTBs).1 To maintain this status, a business must meet several statutory requirements.3 A primary requirement is that the QHTB must conduct more than 50% of its activities in qualified research activities (QRAs) within the State of Hawaii.3 Furthermore, the business must generally have no more than 500 employees, categorizing the incentive primarily toward small- to medium-sized technology firms.2

The law explicitly recognizes several qualified research sectors, which define the types of activities eligible for QREs like computer rentals. These sectors include the development and design of computer software for commercial purposes (a frequent user of leased computing power), biotechnology, ocean sciences, astronomy, sensor and optic technologies, performing arts products, and non-fossil fuel energy-related technology.1 Data indicates that “Computer software” is often the most common area of research reported by tax credit applicants.7

2.03 Administrative Constraints and Urgency

The effective utilization of the TCRA is heavily constrained by administrative limitations, which necessitates early and accurate accounting for all QREs, including computer lease costs. The total credit amount available statewide is subject to a strict annual cap of $5 million.3 Furthermore, certification for the credit is provided on a first-come, first-served basis until this cap is reached.3

This competitive structure imposes significant urgency on QHTBs. They must submit their application and claim certification to DBEDT by March 31st following the taxable year in which the research was conducted.3 If the $5 million cap is reached, subsequent applicants are denied certification for that tax year, even if their QREs were otherwise compliant.9 The potential denial of a refundable credit due to untimely filing means that any delay caused by deficient documentation—such as insufficient substantiation for the “exclusive use” of leased computers—could jeopardize the QHTB’s ability to secure the credit.1 Taxpayers must also complete an annual electronic survey detailing their expenditures and intellectual property filings with DBEDT by June 30th to maintain compliance.3

III. Federal Foundation: Alignment with IRC §41

The Hawaii TCRA is constructed as an extension of the federal Credit for Increasing Research Activities, defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §41. Federal eligibility is a prerequisite for Hawaii eligibility, establishing a baseline standard for QRE inclusion.

3.01 Federal QRE Definition

Hawaii Revised Statutes explicitly states that “Qualified research expenses” shall have the same meaning as in section 41(b) of the Internal Revenue Code.2 Under IRC §41(b)(1), QREs are defined as the sum of in-house research expenses and contract research expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business.11 This federal definition forms the basis for the specific QRE categories listed on Hawaii tax forms (e.g., wages, supplies, contract research, and rental or lease costs of computers).12

3.02 Computer Costs as In-House Research Expenses

The specific category of rental or lease costs of computers falls under “in-house research expenses”.11 IRC §41(b)(2)(A)(iii) allows the inclusion of “any amount paid or incurred to another person for the right to use computers in the conduct of qualified research”.11 This provision addresses non-capitalized costs associated with accessing necessary computing power, such as cloud services (if structured as a lease/rental for use rights) or leased physical hardware.15

For these costs to be federally qualified, the underlying activity must meet the four-part test for Qualified Research Activities (QRA) established under IRC §41(d) and adopted by Hawaii guidance.3 These tests require the activity to be Technological in Nature, intended for a Permitted Purpose (functional improvement), designed to Eliminate Uncertainty, and constitute a process of Experimentation.3

3.03 Scope Limitation

Federal law imposes a significant limitation on the inclusion of computer use fees: IRC §41(b)(2)(A)(iii) provides that this clause shall not apply if the taxpayer (or related aggregated entity) receives or accrues any amount from any other person for the right to use substantially identical personal property.11 This prevents taxpayers from treating expenses for rented computer hardware as QREs if they are simultaneously engaging in the business of subleasing or renting out the same type of computing assets, a critical restriction for businesses operating shared data center models.

3.04 Impact of 2024 Amendments (Act 139)

Recent amendments to the Hawaii statute through Act 139 (Session Laws of Hawaii 2024) significantly tied the calculation of the Hawaii credit more closely to the federal mechanism.1 Previously, Hawaii allowed credits for all qualified research expenses without regard to previous years’ expenses, effectively ignoring the federal base amount.17 However, Act 139 repealed this provision, necessitating that the federal base amount calculation under IRC §41 now applies.1

This legislative change means that eligible computer lease QREs contribute to the total federal QREs (Column A on Form N-346).13 This total is used in the federal calculation to determine the incremental QREs that exceed the fixed base amount, which in turn determines the federal credit.1 Since the Hawaii credit is determined by prorating the resulting Federal Credit by the ratio of Hawaii QREs to total Federal QREs, an error in qualifying computer lease costs federally reduces the credit base (the numerator of the TCRA formula).1 Furthermore, errors in qualifying computer lease costs in Hawaii (Column B) shrink the ratio used for proration, creating a compounding negative effect on the final refundable Hawaii credit.13

IV. Statutory Interpretation and Local Guidance: The “Exclusive Use” Mandate

The most complex and highest-risk area of compliance regarding computer lease costs is the rigorous standard established by local Hawaiian guidance, which imposes restrictions beyond standard federal requirements.

4.01 The Hawaii Sourcing Requirement

The Hawaii statute imposes a prerequisite that no research expenses incurred outside the State shall be included as QREs for the TCRA.2 Therefore, all computing hardware, servers, or cloud access points related to the leased or rented cost must be physically located and demonstrably utilized within Hawaii.1 This prevents QHTBs from claiming costs associated with data centers or cloud infrastructure located on the mainland, even if managed remotely from Hawaii.

4.02 The Definitive “Exclusive Use” Rule

Hawaii administrative guidance explicitly mandates a stricter utilization standard than is often associated with federal QRE definitions: Costs for leased computers and equipment are only considered Qualified Research Expenses if they are used exclusively in Hawaii R&D activities.1

The intent of this guidance is to narrowly restrict the inclusion of computing expenses to assets purely dedicated to innovation that meet the QRA four-part test. Computer rental expenses constitute a distinct QRE category separate from wages and supplies, reflecting their high usage within software development and technology research sectors in Hawaii.7

4.03 Disqualification of Dual-Use Property (Non-Apportionment)

The interpretation of “exclusive use” by the Department of Taxation (DoTax) and DBEDT is absolute. The law and accompanying guidance do not appear to permit a methodology for apportioning leased computer costs based on dual use (e.g., 70% research, 30% administration).1

The critical implication is that leased computers, servers, or other computing equipment must be strictly segregated from general corporate use. If a leased piece of equipment, such as a specialized high-performance server, is used for qualified research 99% of the time but is also utilized 1% of the time for general administrative tasks (e.g., payroll processing, human resources, general administrative email, or marketing analytics), the entire rental or lease cost for that specific asset is disqualified as a Hawaii QRE.1 This strict standard compels QHTBs to establish dedicated, non-commingled physical or virtual research environments utilizing leased equipment solely for QRA.

4.04 QRE Categorization on Hawaii Forms

The structure of the Hawaii tax form reinforces the dual-column, strict sourcing methodology. Taxpayers claim the credit using Form N-346, which requires reporting of expenses on Line 1e (or Line 2e in some revisions) for “Rental or lease costs of computers”.12

The form requires taxpayers to distinguish between:

• Column A: Reported on Federal Form 6765: The total amount of computer lease QREs that meets federal IRC §41 criteria (potentially including expenses disqualified under Hawaii’s strict rules, like the 1% administrative use expense).13
• Column B: In Hawaii: The amount of computer lease QREs that meets both the federal criteria and the strict Hawaii requirements of being sourced in-state and used exclusively for QRA.13

The difference between Column A and Column B directly reflects the amount of computer lease QREs that were federally eligible but rejected for the state credit due to non-exclusive use or out-of-state sourcing.

The following table summarizes the rigorous standards applied to this expense category:

Table 1: Hawaii QRE Status for Rental or Lease Costs of Computers

V. Compliance Documentation and Calculation Methodology

5.01 Documentation Requirements for Exclusive Use

Given the definitive nature of the “exclusive use” requirement, QHTBs must maintain extensive records that substantiate that leased computing assets were not utilized for any non-QRA purpose. Standard lease contracts are insufficient documentation.

Necessary substantiation records include:

1. Segregation Proof: Internal accounting protocols linking the lease cost directly to a specific R&D cost center, separate from general and administrative overhead.
2. Usage Logs and Access Controls: Auditable system logs detailing access times, user IDs (which must correspond to qualified R&D personnel performing qualified services 1), and the specific research projects utilizing the leased equipment.
3. Physical Location Verification: Records proving the physical location of the leased hardware is within Hawaii, such as asset tags matched to Hawaii office addresses or invoices from local data centers for leased rack space.
4. Policy Compliance: Written company policies establishing that specific leased assets are reserved solely for QRA purposes, and disciplinary measures for non-compliant use.

The high level of scrutiny applied by DoTax to refundable credits 1 means that documentation must clearly establish physical or logical separation of leased assets. Reliance on generalized departmental use estimates carries substantial risk of disallowance.

5.02 DBEDT Certification Process (Form N-346A)

To initiate the claim, the QHTB must obtain certification from DBEDT, which utilizes Form N-346A. The application period generally opens on March 1st, with a hard deadline of March 31st following the taxable year.1 The accuracy of QRE calculation, including computer lease costs, is essential because certification is contingent on the availability of the $5 million annual cap.3 DBEDT’s review of the QRE details (including the required annual survey by June 30th) certifies the total eligible amount before the final credit is claimed with DoTax.3

5.03 DoTax Reporting (Form N-346)

The final credit is claimed using Form N-346, attached to the applicable income tax return (such as Form N-11 or N-30).12 This form explicitly requires the separation of QREs into Column A (Federal) and Column B (Hawaii).13 The figure entered on Line 1e, Column B, for “Rental or lease costs of computers” must reflect the costs that satisfy the strict Hawaii standard of exclusive, in-state use, even if the corresponding Column A figure is higher due to expenses that were federally eligible but locally disqualified (e.g., dual-use equipment costs).13

5.04 Calculation of the Tax Credit

The Hawaii TCRA is not a separate calculation based on a flat percentage of Hawaii QREs. Instead, it is calculated as a pro-rata share of the federal R&D tax credit.1 The methodology, particularly following the 2024 Act 139 amendments requiring the federal base amount calculation 1, involves four core steps:

1. Compute Federal Credit: Calculate the total federal R&D credit using Form 6765, applying the federal base amount (or the Alternative Simplified Credit method, if elected).1
2. Determine Hawaii QREs: Sum all Hawaii-sourced QREs (wages, supplies, contract research, and, critically, exclusively used computer rentals).1 This sum forms the numerator of the ratio.
3. Calculate the Proration Ratio: Divide the Total Hawaii QREs (Step 2) by the Total Federal QREs (the total QREs used in the federal calculation, Step 1).1
   $$\text{Ratio} = \frac{\text{Total Hawaii QREs}}{\text{Total Federal QREs}}$$
4. Calculate Hawaii TCRA: Multiply the total Federal Credit (Step 1) by the Proration Ratio (Step 3).1
   $$\text{TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit} \times \text{Ratio}$$

The calculation confirms that correctly identifying and documenting eligible computer lease QREs in Column B maximizes the Ratio (by increasing the numerator) and, consequently, the final refundable TCRA amount.

VI. Illustrative Example: Application of Exclusive Use and Calculation

This example demonstrates the critical impact of the exclusive use rule on the final refundable credit calculation for a Qualified High Technology Business.

6.01 Scenario Setup: Tech Innovation Co. (A QHTB)

Tech Innovation Co. (TIC) is a QHTB in Hawaii specializing in developing proprietary oceanographic modeling software, a qualified research sector.2 TIC incurs the following research expenses for the taxable year:

6.02 Qualification of Computer Lease Costs

The expenses must be individually assessed against the strict Hawaii criteria:

1. Leased Asset 1 (Dedicated R&D Cluster, $\$50,000$): This cost qualifies for both Federal QREs (Column A) and Hawaii QREs (Column B). It satisfies the exclusive use requirement and the in-state sourcing rule.1
2. Leased Asset 2 (R&D Workstations, $\$20,000$): This cost qualifies for Federal QREs (Column A). However, it is disqualified for Hawaii QREs (Column B) because it fails the exclusive use test due to the 15% non-research administrative use.1 The entire $\$20,000$ lease cost is disallowed for TCRA purposes.
3. Leased Asset 3 (Out-of-State Server, $\$10,000$): This cost qualifies for Federal QREs (Column A). It is disqualified for Hawaii QREs (Column B) because it fails the in-state sourcing requirement, even though its use was exclusively QRA.2

6.03 Total QREs for Calculation

Based on the disqualification analysis:

• Total Federal QREs (Column A): $\$1,500,000 + \$50,000 + \$20,000 + \$10,000 = \mathbf{\$1,580,000}$
• Total Hawaii QREs (Column B): $\$1,500,000 + \$50,000 + \$0 + \$0 = \mathbf{\$1,550,000}$

Table 2: Hypothetical QRE Allocation and Disqualification Analysis

6.04 Step-by-Step TCRA Calculation (Incorporating 2024 Base Amount Rule)

The calculation proceeds by leveraging the federal credit result and applying the Hawaii proration ratio:

Step 1: Calculate Federal Excess QREs.

Assume TIC’s calculated Federal Base Amount (per IRC $\S 41$ and Act 139 requirements) is $\mathbf{\$1,000,000}$.

$$\text{Federal Excess QREs} = \$1,580,000 – \$1,000,000 = \$580,000$$

Step 2: Calculate Federal Tax Credit.

Using the standard 20% rate for simplicity:

$$\text{Federal Credit} = \$580,000 \times 20\% = \mathbf{\$116,000}$$

Step 3: Calculate Hawaii Proration Ratio.

The ratio compares the reduced Hawaii QREs (Column B) against the total Federal QREs (Column A).

$$\text{Ratio} = \frac{\$1,550,000}{\$1,580,000} \approx 0.981013$$

(Rounded to six decimal places, as specified by instructions 13).

Step 4: Calculate Hawaii TCRA.

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \text{Federal Credit} \times \text{Ratio}$$

$$\text{Hawaii TCRA} = \$116,000 \times 0.981013 = \mathbf{\$113,797.51}$$

In this example, the disqualification of $\$30,000$ in lease costs resulted in a ratio less than 1.0, leading to a reduction of $\$2,202.49$ in the final refundable Hawaii credit, purely due to non-compliant computer usage and sourcing.

VII. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations for QHTB Tax Planning

7.01 Summary of Core Compliance Challenge

The inclusion of Rental or Lease Costs of Computers as a Qualified Research Expense under HRS $\S$235-110.91 represents a technically precise area of Hawaii tax law. While federal law provides the basic definition for this expense category under IRC $\S 41$, Hawaii’s local guidance imposes a rigorous, non-negotiable standard requiring exclusive use of the leased equipment solely for QRA purposes conducted within the state.1 The analysis confirms that unlike many other jurisdictions, Hawaii does not permit apportionment for dual-use computer leases; non-exclusive use leads to total cost disqualification.

7.02 Recommendations for Maximizing Computer Lease QREs

To mitigate the risk of disallowance and maximize the refundable credit, QHTBs should implement the following strategic measures concerning leased computing assets:

1. Segregation Mandate: Taxpayers must ensure physical or logical isolation of leased computing assets dedicated to R&D. Establishing dedicated environments, such as leased cloud instances or physical servers exclusively for research teams, is necessary to prove the non-commingled, exclusive use of the equipment.1
2. Contractual and Accounting Clarity: Lease agreements should explicitly name the R&D purpose and the location of the equipment. Furthermore, internal accounting systems must charge these costs to dedicated QRE cost centers that track only qualified research projects.
3. Auditable Tracking Systems: Implementation of granular tracking systems is mandatory. This includes access management logs, network monitoring, and system utilization reports that demonstrate zero usage for administrative, sales, or other non-QRA functions. This level of meticulous documentation provides the only auditable defense against DoTax scrutiny of the exclusive use requirement.

7.03 Strategic Planning Implication

The refundability of the TCRA and the competitive nature of the $\$5$ million annual cap create a high-stakes environment for compliance.1 Given that certification is granted on a first-come, first-served basis, timely and accurate filing is paramount.3 The requirement to submit detailed expense information by the March 31st deadline means that the internal documentation supporting computer lease QREs must be finalized and reviewed by tax counsel well in advance. Insufficient documentation, particularly concerning the exclusive use of leased computers, risks the entire QRE calculation being delayed or reduced, potentially causing the QHTB to miss securing certification before the state maximum is reached.1

7.04 Future Legislative Outlook

Taxpayers must remain cognizant that the Hawaii Tax Credit for Research Activities is currently scheduled to expire and does not apply for tax years beginning after December 31, 2029.1 While legislative monitoring for potential extensions is advisable, QHTBs should operate under the assumption that the strict compliance standards—especially the exclusive use mandate for computer lease costs enforced by DoTax—will remain rigorous throughout the credit’s remaining tenure.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/