The Refundable Portion Percentage (RPP): A Statutory Analysis of the Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC) and 2024 Compliance Requirements

The Refundable Portion Percentage (RPP) is the statutory limit defining what fraction of the Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC) that exceeds a taxpayer’s state tax liability will be paid out as a direct cash refund. For the 2024 tax year, this percentage is fixed at 60% for the Regular RAC and 90% for the Supplemental RAC, with the non-refunded portion being permanently forfeited.

This mechanism is critical for liquidity planning, particularly for early-stage companies and those undertaking large-scale research projects, as it determines the actual cash recovery rate on earned credits. Iowa’s RPP structure, established by state law and administered by the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR), utilizes an aggressive phase-down schedule for the Regular RAC while maintaining a highly favorable rate for the Supplemental RAC, signaling a policy shift toward targeted, performance-based economic development subsidies. Analyzing this structure requires a deep dive into the Iowa Code, IDR guidance, and the significant financial impact of the accompanying forfeiture rule.

Foundation of the Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC)

The Iowa Research Activities Credit (RAC) provides businesses operating within the state an incentive for increasing qualified research expenditures (QREs) within Iowa. This credit is rooted in Iowa Code $\S 422.10$ (for individuals) and $\S 422.33(5)$ (for corporations) and is designed to mirror federal R&D tax credit provisions under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) $\S 41$.1

Legislative Intent and Eligibility Requirements

The primary legislative intent behind the RAC is to stimulate in-state innovation and job creation by reducing the effective cost of R&D activities. A fundamental prerequisite for claiming the Iowa RAC is that the business must claim and be allowed the federal research credit for the same taxable year.3 This conformity standard ensures consistency in the definition of what constitutes qualified research activity—generally, activities intended to develop a new or improve an existing product, process, formula, or software, addressing technical uncertainty through a process of experimentation.4

Furthermore, eligibility for the Iowa RAC is significantly constrained by industry limitations, applying only to businesses engaged in specific sectors: Manufacturing, Life Sciences, Software Engineering, and Aviation and Aerospace.4 This targeted approach ensures that the state’s investment in R&D credits focuses on industries deemed essential for Iowa’s economic growth and competitiveness. Businesses operating outside these listed industries are ineligible and must refrain from claiming the credit, potentially requiring amended returns if claimed previously.5

Calculation Methods and Base Rate Structures

Taxpayers calculate the Iowa RAC using methods consistent with their federal election, which provides two primary approaches 6:

1. The Regular Credit Method: This standard approach utilizes a 6.5% rate applied to the excess of QREs during the tax year over a statutory “base amount”.2 The credit also includes 6.5% of increased basic research payments in Iowa.3 The base amount calculation requires determining a fixed-base percentage (not to exceed 16.00%) multiplied by the average annual gross receipts of the taxpayer for the four preceding tax years.3 A crucial modification is that the base amount can never be less than 50% of the current year’s QREs.5
2. The Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC) Method: Taxpayers electing the ASC federally are required to use the corresponding ASC method for the Iowa credit.6 Under the Iowa ASC, the rate is 4.55% of the excess QREs over a specific base amount, which is typically 50% of the average QREs for the three preceding tax years (or 0% if there are no prior QREs).2

The fact that the credit is structured to be refundable provides significant advantage. Refundability means that a business does not need to be profitable or have a tax liability to receive the economic benefit in the form of a cash payout, which is particularly beneficial for high-growth, early-stage firms and startups engaged in capital-intensive research.4 However, this refundability is precisely where the Refundable Portion Percentage (RPP) introduces limitations and complexity.

Statutory and Regulatory Framework of Refundability

The application of the RPP is governed by specific guidance from the IDR, primarily outlined in the instructions for forms IA 128 (Regular Method) and IA 128S (ASC Method). The RPP mechanism applies only to the portion of the credit that exceeds the taxpayer’s calculated Iowa tax liability for the year.

Defining the Excess Credit (The RPP Base)

The RPP is not applied to the entire credit earned, but only to the “excess credit amount.” The credit is first used to offset the taxpayer’s Iowa income tax liability dollar-for-dollar. Once the liability is reduced to zero, the remaining, unused portion of the credit constitutes the excess amount that becomes subject to the statutory refund limitation.3

Administrative Guidance and Filing Procedures

The IDR administers the refund limitations through its established forms and guidance. Taxpayers must timely file the necessary RAC calculation form (IA 128 or IA 128S) and then report the calculated credit on the IA 148 Tax Credits Schedule, utilizing tax credit code 58.3 The final determination of the refundable credit amount is explicitly tied to the statutory limits defined in the Iowa Code, which sets forth a binding phase-down schedule.

The Phased Reduction Schedule for the Regular RAC

A critical element of the Iowa RAC legislation is the mandated, aggressive reduction in the Refundable Portion Percentage over a short period. This phase-out schedule significantly impacts financial planning for businesses relying on the cash flow derived from the credit. IDR guidance confirms the phasing 3:

• For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023, but before January 1, 2024, the RPP was 80%.3
• For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2024, but before January 1, 2025, the RPP is 60%.8 This rate is the operative statutory limitation for current corporate tax planning.
• For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, but before January 1, 2026, the RPP drops further to 40%.8
• For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, the RPP drops to 20%.8

This scheduled decline in the refund percentage is a deliberate policy mechanism to reduce the state’s contingent tax liability quickly.8 By establishing a mandatory sunset for the high refundability rates, the legislature systematically decreases the budgetary outlay associated with the program. This preemptive fiscal planning effectively limits the taxpayer’s ability to receive cash back from the state on generally claimed R&D credits, forcing companies to capture the benefit while the rates are still relatively favorable.

Table 1: Iowa Regular RAC Refundable Portion Percentage (RPP) Phasing Schedule

Differential Analysis: Regular RAC vs. Supplemental RAC

The Iowa R&D landscape features two distinct credits: the Regular Research Activities Credit (RAC) and the Supplemental Research Activities Credit. The most important statutory difference between the two lies in their respective Refundable Portion Percentages (RPPs).

The Elevated Refundability of the Supplemental RAC

The Supplemental Research Activities Credit is an additional incentive available only to businesses that have been approved by the Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA) under specific programs, such as the High-Quality Jobs (HQJ) Program or the Enterprise Zone Program.6

Crucially, while the Regular RAC refund percentage is subject to the aggressive phase-down, the Supplemental RAC maintains an elevated and stable refundability limit of 90%.3

This Supplemental Credit is earned in addition to the regular credit and offers a higher rate of return on qualifying incremental research expenditures (QREs).1 The rate applied is tiered based on the size of the company 9:

• For eligible businesses whose gross revenues do not exceed $20 million per year, the Supplemental Credit can be up to 10% of qualifying incremental research expenses.7
• For eligible businesses whose gross revenues exceed $20 million per year, the Supplemental Credit can be up to 3% of qualifying incremental research expenses.7

Policy Implications of the Differential Rate

The statutory divergence between the two RPPs (60% for Regular RAC in 2024 versus 90% for Supplemental RAC) is a clear indication of state policy priorities. The stability of the 90% rate for IEDA-approved projects demonstrates that Iowa places a higher premium on R&D activity that is contractually tied to measurable economic outcomes, such as defined job creation or capital investment requirements mandated by the HQJ or Enterprise Zone agreements.7

For a business evaluating its R&D tax strategy, this differential creates a compelling economic pressure to seek IEDA program approval. Every dollar of excess Supplemental Credit generates $0.90 in cash, while every dollar of excess Regular Credit in 2024 generates only $0.60. The 30-cent difference per dollar provides a powerful financial motivation for companies to participate in IEDA-managed economic development programs, effectively ensuring that the most favorable R&D incentive benefit is directed toward projects that meet broader, performance-based economic development targets.

The Critical Penalty: Statutory Forfeiture of Unrefunded Credit

Beyond the phased reduction in the RPP, the most severe financial constraint imposed by the Iowa RAC structure is the statutory treatment of the unrefunded portion of the excess credit.

The “No Carryforward Rule”

Iowa guidance explicitly clarifies that any credit amount that exceeds the refundable limit for the tax year cannot be carried forward to be applied against tax liabilities in future tax periods.3 This “no carryforward rule” means that the percentage of the excess credit that is not refunded (e.g., the 40% non-refunded portion of the Regular RAC in 2024, or the 10% non-refunded portion of the Supplemental RAC) is permanently forfeited by the taxpayer.3

This mandate is unique compared to tax regimes in many other states, where excess non-refundable credits often convert to carryforwards for 5, 10, or 20 years. Iowa’s policy choice to enforce immediate forfeiture instead of long-term carryforward reveals an intent focused exclusively on immediate economic stimulus through cash payouts, rather than providing long-term tax deferral attributes.

Financial Impact of Permanent Forfeiture

The forfeiture rule dramatically affects the realized value of the Iowa RAC, particularly for companies with little or no current Iowa tax liability. For these entities, the effective credit rate is significantly diminished:

• For the Regular RAC in 2024, the statutory credit rate is 6.5%. However, if the entire credit is in an excess position (i.e., not offsetting liability), the realized cash rate is effectively $60\% \times 6.5\% = 3.9\%$ of the incremental QREs. The remaining 2.6% is earned but permanently lost.
• This immediate value destruction fundamentally alters the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculation for R&D projects. Tax planners cannot rely on future profitability to utilize the credit; if the credit is not used to offset current liability, it must be maximized through the RPP, and the remainder must be written off.

This structure necessitates careful tax planning to ensure that, where possible, R&D expenditures align with years of high Iowa tax liability to maximize the full dollar-for-dollar offset before the RPP limits apply. The policy is structured to encourage immediate utilization or reliance on the state’s budget for cash recovery, while penalizing those who might typically rely on accumulated tax attributes.

Calculation Methodology and Practical Example (Tax Year 2024)

To fully illustrate the application of the RPP and the forfeiture rule, a detailed calculation demonstrating both the Regular RAC and the Supplemental RAC limits is necessary, based on the statutory 2024 rates.

Scenario Setup

A hypothetical manufacturing firm, eligible for the Iowa RAC 4, conducts qualified research activities. The firm has secured approval under the Enterprise Zone Program, qualifying it for the Supplemental Research Activities Credit. The firm’s gross revenues are below the $20 million threshold, making it eligible for the higher Supplemental rate.7 The firm uses the Regular Credit Method.

• Total Regular RAC Earned: $1,200,000
• Total Supplemental RAC Earned (at 10% rate): $300,000
• Total Iowa Income Tax Liability (before credits): $400,000
• Applicable RPPs (2024 Tax Year): Regular RAC 60%, Supplemental RAC 90%.3

Step-by-Step Application

The calculation must first apply the total earned credit to offset the tax liability, and then subject the remaining excess credit to the specific, differential RPP limits. While specific IDR instructions detail the order of credit application, for the purpose of quantifying the excess subject to RPP, we analyze how the liability is offset and how the excess is split between the two credit types.

The total credit available is $\text{\$1,200,000} \text{ (Regular)} + \text{\$300,000} \text{ (Supplemental)} = \text{\$1,500,000}$. The entire $\$400,000$ tax liability is offset dollar-for-dollar by the credit, resulting in $\$1,100,000$ in excess credit.

We assume the Regular RAC is applied first to the liability, leaving the Supplemental RAC largely intact for higher refundability, reflecting a common strategy to maximize the 90% rate.

Table 2: Calculation of Iowa R&D Credit Refundability (Tax Year 2024)

The example demonstrates that the firm successfully eliminated its entire $\$400,000$ tax liability and generated a substantial cash refund of $\$750,000$. However, due to the RPP limits and the mandated forfeiture rule, the firm permanently lost $\$350,000$ of the value it earned. This is a crucial takeaway for corporate financial modeling: the cash refund is powerful, but the cost of the liquidity mechanism is the immediate loss of all unrefunded excess credits.

Compliance and Reporting Requirements (IDR Guidance)

Accurate reporting of the Iowa RAC and the application of the RPP schedule requires strict adherence to IDR regulations and form instructions.

Documentation and Filing Procedures

Businesses must ensure they meet the documentation standards required to substantiate QREs, aligning with federal IRC $\S 41$ requirements.3 The final claim is channeled through the Iowa tax reporting process 6:

1. Credit Calculation: The taxpayer completes either Form IA 128 (Regular RAC) or IA 128S (ASC), depending on the elected method, to calculate the gross credit amount, including the Supplemental Credit if applicable.6
2. Credit Application: The credit amounts are then transferred to the IA 148 Tax Credits Schedule, under Code 58.6 This schedule facilitates the application of the credit against the tax liability and calculates the resulting excess amount.
3. Refund Determination: The refundable portion of the excess credit is calculated using the statutory RPP (60% for Regular RAC in 2024), and this resulting cash refund is processed through the state tax return (e.g., IA 1040 for individuals or IA 1120 for corporations).

The Department of Revenue (IDR) guidance emphasizes that adherence to the federal calculation of the base amount and QREs is mandatory for claiming the Iowa credit.3

Pass-Through Entity (PTE) Reporting

For businesses structured as pass-through entities—such as S corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs), or trusts—the R&D tax credit is not claimed at the entity level, but rather flows directly through to the individual owners or partners.1

The calculation of the credit, including the application of the RPP limitations, is typically performed at the entity level to determine the total refundable and forfeited amounts. The individual owner or partner then claims their pro rata share of the credit based on their share of the entity’s earnings.1 This flow-through nature ensures that the economic benefit, including the cash refund, directly supports the individual investors and entrepreneurs driving the research activity.6 The IDR provides specific forms, such as the IA 128, line 37, or IA 128S, line 32, for reporting the credit received from a pass-through entity.6

The Future of Iowa R&D Incentives: Legislative Transition

The aggressive phase-down of the Regular RAC RPP is a necessary prelude to a broader structural change in Iowa’s R&D tax policy, scheduled to take effect after the 2025 tax year.

Impending Statutory Repeal

The current statutory Research Activities Credit (RAC) is scheduled for repeal for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025.7 This timing aligns perfectly with the final, lowest RPP rate of 20% scheduled for the 2026 tax year.8 By systematically reducing the refundability, the state is managing the fiscal impact of winding down the entitlement-based credit program.

Replacement Program under Senate File 657

The state legislature, through measures like Senate File 657, has proposed replacing the statutory RAC with a new incentive program administered and controlled by the IEDA.7 This proposed replacement program shifts the R&D incentive from a tax credit entitlement—where any eligible business meeting the requirements can claim the benefit—to a competitive, budget-capped grant or credit allocation program.

Initial proposals for the new program suggest a lower effective rate (up to 3.5% on QREs) and include a significant annual appropriation cap, potentially around $40 million.7 Furthermore, the new program is expected to introduce more rigorous administrative requirements, including application-based access and mandatory CPA verification of expenses.7

The transition signals a systemic movement away from broad, automatic tax relief towards a discretionary, performance-managed system where the state maintains strict control over the total annual expenditure on R&D incentives. For businesses, this means that the 2024 and 2025 tax years represent the final opportunities to capitalize on the existing credit structure before the incentive becomes competitive and budget-limited.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Refundable Portion Percentage (RPP) is the key determinant of the Iowa Research Activities Credit’s immediate cash value, particularly in the 2024 tax year when the rate for the Regular RAC is set at 60%. This substantial reduction from the prior year’s 80% rate, coupled with the absolute forfeiture of the unrefunded 40% balance, necessitates immediate adjustments to corporate financial models. The state has clearly articulated a policy favoring strict fiscal control and rewarding targeted economic development.

The analysis yields several critical conclusions for corporate leaders and tax directors operating in Iowa:

1. Devaluation of Regular RAC: For a company unable to fully utilize the Regular RAC against current Iowa tax liability, the effective value of the credit has decreased by 25% from 2023 to 2024 (80% RPP to 60% RPP). The immediate loss of 40 cents on every dollar of excess credit requires recognizing a lower effective return on investment for general R&D activities.
2. Strategic Superiority of Supplemental RAC: The stability and high refundability of the Supplemental RAC (90% RPP) provides a critical shield against the phased devaluation. Companies should prioritize obtaining or maintaining qualification under IEDA programs (such as the High-Quality Jobs Program or Enterprise Zones) to maximize the portion of their R&D spend eligible for the superior 90% refund rate.7
3. Optimization Against Tax Liability is Paramount: Because the unrefunded credit is permanently forfeited, tax planning must focus on maximizing the dollar-for-dollar offset against current Iowa tax liability. Strategies that increase Iowa taxable income in the credit year, thereby minimizing the excess amount subject to the punitive 60% RPP and forfeiture rule, yield the highest total credit value capture.
4. Final Window of Opportunity: The scheduled repeal of the current statutory RAC post-2025, preceded by the terminal phase-down to a 20% RPP in 2026, confirms that the current program is nearing its expiration. Businesses must expedite R&D projects and credit claims within the 2024 and 2025 tax years to benefit from the existing rates before the incentive transitions to a more competitive and budget-restricted IEDA-managed model.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/