Evolution of the Michigan Research and Development Tax Landscape: From Legacy MBT Certificated Credits to the 2025 Refundable Framework

The Michigan Business Tax (MBT) Research and Development (R&D) credit is a legacy fiscal incentive allowing certain taxpayers to offset liability by a percentage of their qualified research expenses. Under current law, this credit primarily exists for companies that elect to remain under the MBT to exhaust “certificated” credits awarded prior to 2012, serving as a historical bridge to Michigan’s newly enacted refundable R&D credit commencing in 2025.

The trajectory of research incentives in the State of Michigan is a complex narrative of legislative shifts, moving from the multifaceted Michigan Business Tax Act of 2007 to the streamlined Corporate Income Tax (CIT) of 2012, and finally arriving at a robust, refundable R&D framework established by Public Acts 186 and 187 of 2024.1 For practitioners and business leaders, understanding the “prior R&D credit context” is not merely an academic exercise in tax history; it is a functional requirement for any entity still operating under the MBT election.4 The interaction between legacy nonrefundable credits and the mandatory CIT comparison creates a dual-track compliance environment where taxpayers must simultaneously calculate liability under two distinct tax regimes to determine their final state obligation.5 As Michigan decouples from federal capitalization requirements under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 174, these state-level incentives have transitioned from being optional enhancements to essential components of capital preservation for high-tech and manufacturing firms.7

The Genesis of the Michigan Business Tax and the Section 405 Credit

The Michigan Business Tax (MBT) was inaugurated as a replacement for the Single Business Tax (SBT), aiming to create a more modern and competitive environment for businesses while maintaining state revenue.1 Within this framework, MCL 208.1405 established the primary research and development credit.1 This credit was designed to mirror the federal research credit, adopting the definitions and criteria found in IRC Section 41(b).1 By aligning with federal standards, Michigan sought to minimize the administrative burden on taxpayers who were already tracking “qualified research expenses” (QREs) for their federal returns.1

Under the original MBT Act, the credit rate was tiered based on the transition of the tax itself. For the 2008 tax year, taxpayers were permitted a nonrefundable credit equal to 1.52% of their research and development expenses incurred in Michigan.1 For the 2009 tax year and all subsequent years, this rate was increased to 1.90%.1 The statute was specific in its geographical requirement: only expenses for research conducted “in this state” were eligible for the Michigan credit, requiring firms to meticulously isolate Michigan-based wages, supplies, and contract research costs from their total federal pool.1

The MBT R&D credit did not operate in a vacuum. It was part of a cluster of incentives, including the Compensation Credit and the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) under Section 403.1 The legislature imposed a strict ceiling on these combined benefits; the total sum of the R&D credit, Compensation Credit, and ITC could not exceed 65% of the taxpayer’s tax liability before the application of the business tax surcharge under Section 281.1 This limitation ensured that while companies were incentivized to innovate and invest in Michigan, they would always maintain a minimum level of tax contribution to the state’s General Fund.1

The 2011 Repeal and the Birth of Certificated Credits

In 2011, a significant policy shift led to the effective repeal of the MBT for the vast majority of taxpayers.2 Governor Rick Snyder signed legislation that replaced the complex MBT with a 6.0% Corporate Income Tax (CIT) for C-corporations and entities taxed as such, while largely exempting flow-through entities from business-level taxation.2 A primary goal of this overhaul was the elimination of the numerous tax credits that had made the MBT difficult to administer and predict from a budgetary perspective.2

However, the state recognized that many businesses had entered into long-term development agreements based on the promise of MBT-era credits.4 To honor these commitments, the concept of “certificated credits” was introduced.1 These are credits awarded or assigned before January 1, 2012, that have not been fully claimed or utilized.1 The list of certificated credits is specific and includes incentives such as Michigan Economic Growth Authority (MEGA) credits, Brownfield Redevelopment credits, Historic Preservation credits, Renaissance Zone credits, and certain Film Production credits.4

The Binding MBT Election (MCL 208.1500)

To continue receiving the benefit of these certificated credits, a taxpayer must voluntarily elect to file under the MBT structure rather than the CIT.1 This election is governed by MCL 208.1500 and carries heavy implications.12 Once a taxpayer files an MBT return for the first tax year ending after December 31, 2011, and claims a certificated credit, they have effectively made an irrevocable election.1 The taxpayer must remain in the MBT system, paying the MBT tax rates and calculating their base according to MBT rules, until the certificated credit and any associated carryforwards are completely exhausted.1

This creates a scenario where the Section 405 R&D credit remains relevant today.1 A taxpayer who stays in the MBT to use a MEGA credit, for instance, is also entitled to claim the 1.90% R&D credit for their current-year Michigan research expenses.1 However, as the research material indicates, once that taxpayer’s certificated credits are gone, their eligibility to file under the MBT ceases, and they must transition to either the CIT or the new 2025 R&D credit framework.5

Administrative Guidance and Revenue Administrative Bulletins

The Michigan Department of Treasury provides guidance through Revenue Administrative Bulletins (RABs) to ensure uniform application of the law.15 For taxpayers navigating the MBT-era credits, several RABs remain highly relevant.

RAB 2010-5: Sourcing and the Benefit of Services

Because the MBT R&D credit is restricted to expenses incurred in Michigan, the rules for apportioning activity are paramount.1 RAB 2010-5 outlines the “benefit of services” rule, which dictates how receipts and, by extension, business activities are sourced to the state.17 The MBT Act provides that receipts from the performance of services are sourced to Michigan if the recipient of the services receives the benefit of the services in Michigan.17

For R&D-intensive firms, this means that even if the research is physically performed at a laboratory in Michigan, the taxpayer must maintain adequate documentation to show that the benefit of that R&D service is received within the state’s borders to justify the credit.8 The Department of Treasury emphasizes that the method used to determine the extent of the benefit must be reasonable and consistently applied.17

RAB 2012-6 and Foundation Credits

The MBT also provided for credits related to contributions to education and community foundations.16 RAB 2012-6 lists certified education foundations for which taxpayers electing to file under the MBT could claim a credit.18 These credits, while distinct from the R&D credit, are often claimed by the same pool of “legacy” MBT filers.6 The credit is equal to 50% of the contribution, capped at the lesser of $5,000 or 5% of the tax liability.16 These nonrefundable credits contribute to the overall complexity of the MBT filing, as they must be sequenced correctly on Form 4568.16

RAB 2017-10 and 2017-11: Preservation of MBT Credits

Even after the CIT was well-established, the Treasury issued RABs 2017-10 and 2017-11 to reaffirm that certain credits—such as those for contributions to homeless shelters or community foundations—could only be claimed by taxpayers who had made the timely MBT election under MCL 208.1500.16 This reinforces the “siloed” nature of Michigan’s tax system: if a company did not elect to stay in the MBT, these legacy credits were effectively abandoned.4

The Required CIT Comparison: The “Higher Of” Rule

One of the most technically challenging aspects of the MBT R&D credit context is the mandatory Corporate Income Tax comparison.5 To prevent taxpayers from using the MBT election as a way to pay less tax than they would under the standard CIT, Michigan law requires a “higher of” calculation.4

A taxpayer filing an MBT return must perform the following three-step analysis to determine their final liability:

Impact on R&D Credits

This comparison rule can effectively “neutralize” the value of an MBT R&D credit.6 If a taxpayer’s MBT liability is $100,000 and they claim a $20,000 R&D credit, their MBT obligation drops to $80,000.6 However, if their hypothetical CIT liability for the same period is $95,000, the comparison rule forces them to pay the $95,000.5 In this case, the $20,000 R&D credit only saved the company $5,000 (the difference between $100k and $95k), rather than the full $20,000.5

The hypothetical CIT liability is further modified to account for certificated credits.5 The tax is reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of certificated nonrefundable credits used in the MBT calculation.5 This ensures that while the R&D credit might be washed out by the comparison, the “certificated” portion of the taxpayer’s incentives—the reason they are in the MBT in the first place—is generally protected.4

Statistical Overview of Legacy Credits and Fiscal Impact

The magnitude of these legacy credits is documented annually in reports to the Michigan Legislature.20 These reports track the remaining “Estimated Remaining Liability” for certificated credits, which provides a window into how much longer the MBT R&D credit context will remain a reality for the state’s budget.20

According to the FY 2024 MEGA and Other Certificated Credits Annual Report, the state continues to manage billions of dollars in projected payouts and credits.21

Estimated Outstanding Certificated Credits by Tax Year

The following data, synthesized from Treasury reports, illustrates the sunsetting of the MBT-era incentives:

Sources: 20

The data suggests that while programs like Brownfield Redevelopment are nearing their final expiration (with some projects extended to 2023 and beyond by legislative amendment), the MEGA retention credits continue to have a massive fiscal footprint, extending as far as 2032.11 This means the “Prior R&D Credit Context” will remain functionally relevant for major automotive and advanced manufacturing firms for another decade.11

The Modern Shift: The 2025 Refundable R&D Credit

Recognizing the competitive disadvantage of having no active R&D incentive for new or non-legacy businesses, the Michigan legislature passed Public Acts 186 and 187 of 2024.3 This legislation creates a new R&D tax credit that is fundamentally different from its MBT predecessor.3

Tiered Credit Structure and Refundability

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, the new credit is available to both CIT payers and certain flow-through entities.3 Unlike the MBT’s flat 1.90% nonrefundable rate, the new credit is tiered based on the number of employees and is fully refundable if it exceeds the taxpayer’s liability.3

Sources: 8

The “base amount” for this new credit is calculated as the average annual amount of qualifying R&D expenses incurred during the three calendar years immediately preceding the credit year.8 If a business has no R&D history, the base amount is zero, allowing for immediate high-percentage utilization of the credit.14

University Collaboration Bonus

To further incentivize Michigan’s academic-industrial pipeline, the law allows an additional 5.0% credit (capped at $200,000 annually) for expenses incurred in collaboration with a Michigan research university pursuant to a written agreement.8 This can bring the total state credit for excess research spending at a small firm up to 20% (15% base excess + 5% university bonus), significantly offsetting the cost of high-level scientific inquiry.24

Compliance and the “Double Filing” Procedural Requirement

The Michigan Department of Treasury has outlined a specific administrative process for the new credit to manage the statewide $100 million aggregate cap ($25 million for small businesses, $75 million for large).7

1. Tentative Claim: For expenses incurred in the 2025 calendar year, all claimants (including fiscal-year filers) must submit a tentative claim to the Treasury by April 1, 2026.8 This claim identifies the unadjusted credit amount and includes required supporting data.8
2. Proration and Notification: The Treasury will aggregate all claims. If the $100 million cap is exceeded, the state will prorate the credits.7 For instance, if large businesses submit $150 million in claims, each claim would be reduced by 50%.3
3. Final Claim on Annual Return: Taxpayers then report the adjusted credit amount on their annual Corporate Income Tax return.7

This process necessitates that CIT filers extend their state returns, as the final credit amount cannot be known until the Treasury publishes the proration notice, typically anticipated by April 30 following the tentative claim deadline.7

Interaction Between MBT Legacy and the New 2025 Credit

One of the most critical requirements for businesses to understand is the mutual exclusivity of these two regimes.14 A taxpayer cannot “double dip” by claiming the legacy MBT R&D credit and the new 2025 R&D credit simultaneously.8

The statute for flow-through entities specifically excludes any entity filing under the MBT Act from participating in the new R&D credit.14 Consequently, if a business still has a certificated credit (like a Brownfield credit) that requires them to file under the MBT, they are disqualified from the new, potentially more lucrative, 15% refundable R&D credit.8

This creates a strategic dilemma. A company must evaluate whether the remaining value of its certificated credits is greater than the projected benefit of the new R&D credit.2 If the certificated credit is small, the taxpayer may choose to forgo it, exit the MBT election, and move to the CIT to claim the 2025 R&D credit.4 However, the law is clear: once the MBT election is made, it generally cannot be revoked until the credits are exhausted.1 There is currently a legislative discussion (e.g., House Bill 4180) about allowing taxpayers to “elect out” of the MBT and move to the CIT for tax years beginning with 2025, which would provide much-needed flexibility for firms wanting to modernize their tax strategy.29

Technical Nuances: Decoupling from IRC Section 174

At the federal level, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) significantly altered the treatment of R&D expenses under Section 174, requiring companies to capitalize and amortize research costs over five years rather than expensing them immediately.7 While federal efforts have been made to restore immediate expensing, Michigan has specifically “decoupled” from these changes for state purposes.7

For Michigan Business Tax and Corporate Income Tax purposes, the state continues to require the amortization of domestic R&E costs over a five-year period.7 This makes the 2025 R&D tax credit a crucial policy tool; while businesses are losing the immediate deduction on their income tax base, the refundable credit provides a direct cash injection that restores some of the liquidity lost to capitalization.7 This decoupling underscores why the R&D credit “matters more now” than it did during the early MBT years, when immediate expensing was the norm.7

Detailed Example: Multi-Regime R&D Credit Calculation

To visualize the application of these rules, let us examine “Vortex Engineering,” a Michigan-based aerospace firm with 300 employees and a legacy MEGA credit that will expire in 2026.

Scenario 1: Vortex Stays in the MBT (2025)

Vortex remains an MBT filer because they still have $150,000 in nonrefundable MEGA credits.4

• 2025 Michigan QREs: $2,000,000
• MBT R&D Credit (Sec 405): $2,000,000 \times 0.019 = $38,000
• MEGA Certificated Credit: $150,000
• Pre-Credit MBT Liability: $400,000
• Total MBT Credits: $188,000 ($150k MEGA + $38k R&D)
• Net MBT Tax: $212,000 ($400k – $188k)

Now, the required CIT comparison must be performed.5

• Hypothetical CIT Liability (before credits): $250,000
• Adjustment for Nonrefundable Certificated Credits: The CIT liability is reduced by the $150,000 MEGA credit used in the MBT calculation.5
• Hypothetical CIT Final: $100,000 ($250k – $150k)
• Comparison Outcome: Since the MBT liability ($212,000) is higher than the hypothetical CIT ($100,000), Vortex pays the $212,000.5

In this context, the $38,000 legacy R&D credit was fully utilized.1

Scenario 2: Vortex Hypothetically Transitions to the 2025 Credit

If Vortex were permitted to exit the MBT and move to the CIT for 2025, they would lose the $150,000 MEGA credit but qualify for the new R&D incentive.8

• Employee Count: 300 (Large Business tier) 8
• 2025 QREs: $2,000,000
• Base Amount (3-yr average): $1,200,000
• Calculation:

• 3% on Base: $1,200,000 \times 0.03 = $36,000
• 10% on Excess: ($2,000,000 – $1,200,000) \times 0.10 = $80,000
• Total 2025 R&D Credit: $116,000 8

While the $116,000 refundable credit is significant, it does not outweigh the $150,000 MEGA credit they would have to forfeit.2 Therefore, Vortex Engineering remains in the MBT for 2025. This example illustrates how the “Prior R&D Credit Context” is inextricably linked to the remaining life of the certificated credit that anchors the taxpayer to the MBT.4

Mathematical Foundations of the Michigan R&D Incentives

For professional peers and tax directors, the underlying formulas used in Michigan’s R&D environment must be understood with LaTeX precision to ensure compliance with the Business Tax Act and the Income Tax Act.

The MBT R&D Credit Formula (Legacy)

The nonrefundable credit $C_{MBT}$ under Section 405 is expressed as:

$$C_{MBT} = QRE_{MI} \times r$$

Where $QRE_{MI}$ represents qualified research expenses defined by IRC 41(b) incurred in Michigan, and $r$ is the rate of 0.0152 (for 2008) or 0.019 (for 2009–present).1

This is subject to the aggregate credit limitation $L$:

$$(C_{MBT} + C_{Comp} + C_{ITC}) \leq 0.65 \times T_{pre-surcharge}$$

Where $C_{Comp}$ is the Compensation Credit, $C_{ITC}$ is the Investment Tax Credit, and $T_{pre-surcharge}$ is the tax liability before Section 281 surcharges.1

The 2025 CIT R&D Credit Formula (New)

For large businesses ($E \geq 250$), the unadjusted credit $C_{Large}$ is:

$$C_{Large} = (B \times 0.03) + ((QRE_{curr} – B) \times 0.10) + (QRE_{univ} \times 0.05)$$

For small businesses ($E < 250$), the unadjusted credit $C_{Small}$ is:

$$C_{Small} = (B \times 0.03) + ((QRE_{curr} – B) \times 0.15) + (QRE_{univ} \times 0.05)$$

Where:

• $B$ = Base Amount (Average $QRE$ for the 3 preceding calendar years).8
• $QRE_{curr}$ = Current calendar year Michigan research expenses.8
• $QRE_{univ}$ = Expenses incurred in collaboration with a Michigan research university.8
• $C_{Large}$ is capped at $2,000,000$ per year.8
• $C_{Small}$ is capped at $250,000$ per year.8

The bonus $QRE_{univ} \times 0.05$ is separately capped at $200,000$ per year.8

Compliance Deadlines and Statutory Reporting

The transition between these tax regimes is monitored through mandatory reporting. The Michigan Department of Treasury is required to provide an annual report to the legislature regarding the effectiveness and cost of these credits.3

Key Filing Deadlines for 2025–2026

Taxpayers must be aware of the following critical dates to avoid losing eligibility:

The tentative claim must include actual expenses incurred during the calendar year, even for fiscal-year filers whose tax year might not align with the calendar year.8 This is a significant departure from standard Michigan tax procedures and requires a special “calendar year” R&D sub-accounting.14

Local Revenue Office Guidance and Internal Policy Directives

In addition to RABs, Internal Policy Directives (IPDs) provide granular detail on how audits are conducted.15 IPD 2006-8, for instance, focuses on “costs of performance” and how a taxpayer’s business activity is isolated to Michigan.30

The Treasury interprets the cost of performance rule by looking at each “sale” or contract for service as a separate transaction.30 For an R&D firm, this means that if they are performing contract research for a client, the eligibility for the credit (and the sourcing of the receipt) depends on where the majority of the research activity for that specific contract occurs.17 Taxpayers are expected to maintain documentation such as time logs, purchase orders, and project-specific ledgers to satisfy these IPD requirements during a state audit.26

Potential Scam Alerts and Administrative Environment

The administrative landscape in Michigan is also characterized by rigorous security measures. The Treasury has issued multiple alerts regarding “Reminder of Tax Due” letters that contain incorrect toll-free TTY numbers, which may connect callers to potential scams.31 While seemingly tangential, these alerts signal a heightened state of vigilance within the Bureau of Tax Policy, and taxpayers are advised to verify all correspondence regarding their MBT or CIT R&D claims through the official Treasury channels at 517-636-4486.31

The Future of Michigan R&D: Legislative and Fiscal Outlook

As the state moves toward the 2025 implementation, the legislative environment remains dynamic. Public Act 186 and 187 are seen as “wins” for the Michigan business community, aiming to position the state as a leader in cutting-edge industries.24 By providing a combined state and federal credit that can reach approximately 20% of total QREs, Michigan is actively competing with other tech-heavy states.24

SOAR and SOAR Replacement Discussions

The funding for these credits is often intertwined with larger economic development discussions, such as the Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve (SOAR) Fund.29 Legislative proposals have suggested shifting revenue from the Corporate Income Tax to road funding or housing while maintaining the $100 million earmark for R&D.11 The “MEGA and Other Certificated Credits” report for 2024 confirms that as MEGA retention credits expire in the late 2020s, the General Fund will see a significant “backfill” of revenue, which could be used to expand the $100 million R&D cap if the program proves successful.11

Early Termination of Legacy Credits

House Bill 5937 represents a recent trend toward allowing the “early termination” of MBT credits in exchange for other business benefits or to simplify the state’s balance sheet.36 While currently focused on Renaissance Zone credits, this logic could eventually be extended to other MBT certificated credits, allowing more firms to transition to the new 2025 refundable R&D framework earlier than their original contracts allowed.36

Comprehensive Case Study: The Small Business Perspective

To further clarify the guidance, consider “Michigan Micro-Systems,” a startup with 40 employees that has never filed for an MBT credit and has no R&D history.

Step 1: Evaluating Eligibility for 2025

The firm is an “authorized business” because it is a corporation incurring eligible R&D expenses in Michigan.8 Because they have fewer than 250 employees, they fall into the “Small Business” tier.8

Step 2: Calculating the Credit

In 2025, they spend $500,000 on qualified research.

• Base Amount: Since they had $0 expenses in 2022, 2023, and 2024, their base is $0.14
• Credit Calculation:

• 3% of $0 = $0
• 15% of $500,000 (the excess) = $75,000 14

• Total Unadjusted Credit: $75,000

Step 3: University Partnership

They spend $50,000 of that $500,000 on a project with the University of Michigan.26

• Bonus: $50,000 \times 0.05 = $2,500
• New Total Credit: $77,500

Step 4: The Tentative Claim

By April 1, 2026, the firm files their tentative claim with the Treasury.8 If the statewide small-business pool of $25 million is not exceeded, the firm is notified they can claim the full $77,500.3

Step 5: Refundability

On their 2025 CIT return, the firm’s total tax liability is only $10,000.

• Refund: $77,500 credit – $10,000 liability = $67,500 refund check.3

This example highlights the transformative nature of the new credit compared to the legacy MBT context, where such a firm would have likely received no benefit unless they had significant income and were already “locked in” to the MBT system.1

Summary of Core Differences: MBT vs. 2025 R&D Credit

Strategic Recommendations and Conclusion

The “Prior R&D Credit Context” is a legacy environment that remains functionally active for Michigan’s largest employers and those with specialized economic development agreements.4 For these firms, the 1.90% MBT R&D credit is a secondary but useful tool that exists within the shadow of the mandatory CIT comparison.5 However, the future of innovation in the state is clearly vested in the 2025 refundable credit, which offers significantly higher rates and a more direct cash benefit.7

To navigate this landscape effectively, businesses must:

• Confirm their current filing status and the remaining life of any certificated credits.1
• Monitor legislative updates, such as HB 4180, which may provide an exit ramp from the MBT election to access the new refundable credits.29
• Implement calendar-year tracking for R&D expenses to comply with the 2025 tentative claim requirements, regardless of their fiscal year-end.8
• Maintain rigorous documentation of Michigan-based research activities and university partnerships to withstand the anticipated scrutiny of refundable credit audits.7

Ultimately, the transition from the MBT’s nonrefundable 1.90% credit to the CIT’s 15% refundable credit represents a significant reinvestment by the State of Michigan into its high-tech future.7 While the legacy of the MBT persists through certificated credits, the administrative and financial center of gravity is shifting toward the new framework, making it imperative for all Michigan businesses to re-evaluate their R&D tax strategies now.11

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/