Examining the Framework of Wages for Qualified Services within Michigan’s Research and Development Tax Credit Infrastructure

Wages for Qualified Services represent the taxable compensation paid to employees for direct involvement in, supervision of, or support of research activities conducted physically within Michigan. These expenditures serve as the primary qualifying cost component for calculating the state’s newly established refundable R&D tax credit.

The reintroduction of a state-level research and development (R&D) tax credit in Michigan, effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, marks a transformative moment for the state’s industrial and technological sectors. This incentive, established through Public Acts 186 and 187 of 2024, is designed to stimulate high-tech investment by allowing businesses to offset a significant portion of their research-related labor costs.1 At the heart of this credit is the definition of Wages for Qualified Services, a term that bridges federal standards under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) with specific Michigan geographic and administrative constraints.3 For over a decade, Michigan lacked a broad-based R&D incentive following the transition from the Single Business Tax and the Michigan Business Tax to the Corporate Income Tax (CIT).5 The current legislation not only revives this support but does so with a refundable structure that provides immediate liquidity to startups and established firms alike, provided they navigate the rigorous definition of what constitutes a “qualified service” and where those services are performed.7

Statutory Foundation and Legislative Intent

The Michigan R&D tax credit is codified in the Michigan Income Tax Act of 1967, specifically through the addition of Sections 677 and 717.8 These sections distinguish between taxpayers subject to the Corporate Income Tax and employers involved in flow-through entities (FTEs) who are subject to withholding requirements.1 The legislative intent, as articulated by the Senate Fiscal Agency, is to bolster Michigan’s reputation as a hub for innovation while explicitly rewarding businesses that maintain their research footprint within state borders.5

The statutes define “qualifying research and development expenses” by pointing directly to IRC Section 41(b), but they add a critical modifier: the research must be “conducted in this state”.8 This geographic nexus is the defining characteristic of the Michigan credit, separating it from the federal credit which applies to research conducted anywhere in the United States. Furthermore, Michigan’s decision to decouple from the federal treatment of research and experimental expenditures under IRC Section 174—which currently requires five-year amortization for domestic R&D—means that while the state mandates amortization for tax liability purposes, it provides the credit to mitigate the resulting cash-flow impact.13

The Taxonomy of Wages for Qualified Services

To understand Wages for Qualified Services, one must analyze the three distinct roles defined under IRC Section 41 and adopted by the Michigan Department of Treasury: direct performance, direct supervision, and direct support.13

Direct Performance of Research

Direct performance constitutes the most straightforward category of qualified services. This encompasses the activities of scientists, engineers, and software developers who are actively engaged in the “process of experimentation”.6 For their wages to qualify, the work must satisfy the federal “Four-Part Test.” First, the activity must have a “permitted purpose,” meaning it relates to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality of a business component.13 Second, there must be “technical uncertainty” at the outset regarding the capability, method, or design of the product or process.13 Third, the work must involve a “process of experimentation,” which the IRS and Michigan Treasury define as a systematic evaluation of alternatives through modeling, simulation, or trial-and-error.6 Finally, the research must be “technological in nature,” relying on the principles of engineering, computer science, or the physical and biological sciences.13

In the Michigan context, the Department of Treasury has emphasized that “qualified research” does not include routine data collection, efficiency studies, or cosmetic changes to products.14 The wages paid to a developer building a novel algorithm for autonomous vehicle navigation in an Ann Arbor lab would be a quintessential example of wages for direct performance.

Direct Supervision of Research

Direct supervision involves the management of the research process, rather than the general administration of a business unit.13 Wages qualify under this category if the supervisor is the immediate manager of individuals engaged in the direct performance of research.3 This typically includes tasks such as reviewing technical designs, directing the specific path of experimentation, or evaluating technical results.14

However, there is a clear distinction between technical supervision and high-level executive oversight. The wages of a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) may qualify if they are personally involved in the technical direction of specific projects, but the wages of a CEO or HR Director would not, as their roles are generally considered to be management of the business as a whole rather than direct supervision of the research activities themselves.14

Direct Support of Research

The “direct support” category captures wages paid to individuals who facilitate the research process but do not personally conduct experiments or supervise technical staff.3 This includes the labor of a machinist fabricating a prototype, a lab technician cleaning specialized equipment, or a software tester documenting the failure of a new code sequence.14

Crucially, direct support does not encompass “indirect” services. The Michigan Department of Treasury clarifies that general administrative services—such as payroll processing, legal counsel for patent filing, or facilities maintenance—cannot be included in the wage calculation.14 The distinction rests on the proximity of the labor to the actual research activity. If the labor is an integral part of the research cycle, it is likely support; if it merely supports the company that happens to do research, it is excluded.

Geographic Nexus and “In the State” Requirements

The most significant administrative hurdle for Michigan taxpayers is proving that the services were conducted within Michigan borders.6 The statute is explicit: qualifying research and development expenses are only those incurred for research conducted “in this state”.8

Physical Location of Employees

For a wage to be “qualified,” the employee must be physically present in Michigan when the service is performed.3 This creates complexities for companies with remote or hybrid workforces. If a Michigan-headquartered firm employs a lead researcher who resides in Ohio and performs their duties from a home office there, that researcher’s wages are ineligible for the Michigan R&D credit, even if the research benefits a Michigan-based project.12

The Department of Treasury’s April 2025 Notice confirms that taxpayers must isolate Michigan-specific costs.4 Businesses are encouraged to maintain geographic logs or use payroll data that reflects the “work location” of employees to substantiate that the services were performed at a Michigan facility.3

Unitary Business Groups and Geographic Allocation

For Unitary Business Groups (UBGs) filing under the Corporate Income Tax, the “in the state” requirement applies at the member level.10 While the credit is calculated and claimed by the UBG as a single taxpayer, the underlying wages must be tracked back to the specific personnel and physical locations of the members conducting the research within Michigan.10 Any research conducted by a UBG member at a facility outside of Michigan is excluded from both the current year’s Qualifying Research Expenses (QREs) and the calculation of the base amount.12

Employee Headcount and Taxpayer Classification

The Michigan R&D credit utilizes a tiered incentive structure based on the size of the employer, with 250 employees serving as the dividing line between “small” and “large” businesses.1 This classification significantly alters the financial return on qualified wages.

Definition of an Employee

To determine which tier a business falls into, the state looks to IRC Section 3401(c) to define an “employee”.4 Broadly, any person from whom an employer is required to withhold federal income tax is considered an employee for headcount purposes.4 The Michigan Department of Treasury plans to issue further guidance on the exact method for counting these individuals, particularly regarding part-time or seasonal workers, but the primary indicator remains the withholding requirement.4

Aggregation for Control Groups

It is critical for corporate planners to recognize that the 250-employee threshold is not always applied on a per-entity basis. For UBGs, the headcount is aggregated across the entire group.10 If a parent company has 150 employees and its subsidiary has 150 employees, the UBG is classified as a “Large Business” with 300 employees, even if each individual entity remains below the 250-employee mark.10 This aggregation ensures that large corporate structures do not circumvent the per-taxpayer caps by fragmenting their operations into smaller legal entities.

Calculation Mechanics: The Role of the Base Amount

The value of the credit is not derived solely from the current year’s wages. Michigan employs a calculation method that compares current spending against a historical “base amount”.1

Determining the Three-Year Average

The base amount is the average annual amount of qualifying R&D expenses incurred during the three calendar years immediately preceding the year in which the credit is claimed.1

• New Entities: If a business has no prior R&D spending in Michigan, its base amount is zero, allowing it to claim the higher “excess” rate on its entire first-year investment.1
• Incomplete History: If a taxpayer has only one or two years of prior R&D spending, the base amount is the average of those specific years.1
• The Calendar Year Mandate: Regardless of whether a company uses a fiscal year for its general tax filings, the R&D credit calculations—including the base amount and the current year’s qualified wages—must be performed on a calendar-year basis.1

Mathematical Formulas for Credit Calculation

The credit is calculated as follows:

$$Credit = (QRE_{Base} \times 0.03) + (QRE_{Excess} \times Rate_{Excess})$$

Where $QRE_{Base}$ represents expenses up to the three-year average, and $QRE_{Excess}$ represents expenses over that average. The $Rate_{Excess}$ is either 10% or 15% depending on the employee count.1

Administrative Compliance: The Tentative Claim and Proration

Unlike federal R&D credits, which are generally claimed at the time of filing the annual tax return, Michigan requires a preliminary step called the “Tentative Claim”.1 This requirement exists because the state has capped the total annual credit pool at $100 million.1

Deadline Schedule

For the inaugural 2025 tax year, businesses must submit their tentative claims to the Michigan Department of Treasury by April 1, 2026.1 For all subsequent years, the deadline moves to March 15.1 These claims must reflect actual expenses incurred during the prior calendar year, not estimates.10 Failure to meet the tentative claim deadline results in the complete loss of the credit for that year, as the state will not accept late submissions for the proration pool.10

Proration Scenarios

The Department of Treasury will aggregate all tentative claims and compare them to the $100 million cap. If the total exceeds the cap, the state will prorate the credits awarded to each taxpayer.1

If the small business pool is under-utilized, the surplus may be applied to the large business pool, but the small business reserve of $25 million is protected to ensure that entrepreneurial ventures are not crowded out by major industrial players.1

The University Collaboration Bonus

A specialized component of the Michigan R&D credit provides an additional 5% credit for qualifying R&D expenses incurred through collaboration with a Michigan research university.2 For wages to qualify for this bonus, the work must be performed under a formal, written agreement with the institution.5

Defining a Research University

The statute limits this bonus to partnerships with specific institutions. This includes major public universities described in the State Constitution (such as the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, and Wayne State University) as well as independent nonprofit colleges and universities located within the state.11

Strategic Integration of Bonus Wages

When an employee of a business works directly on a project defined in a university agreement, their wages are not only part of the standard QRE calculation but also eligible for this extra 5% kicker.3 This bonus is capped at $200,000 per year and is subject to the overall per-taxpayer limits ($250,000 for small and $2 million for large businesses).5 This makes university partnerships an extremely efficient way for small businesses to reach their maximum credit cap with less total expenditure.

Impact of Michigan’s Decoupling from IRC Section 174

The strategic value of the Michigan R&D credit is amplified by the state’s decision to decouple from federal R&E capitalization rules.13

The Amortization Burden

Under current federal law, businesses can no longer immediately deduct R&D expenses; they must capitalize and amortize them over five years.2 Michigan has adopted this capitalization requirement for the purpose of calculating taxable income.2 This means that in the year the wages are paid, only 1/5th (after applying the mid-year convention) of the expense can be deducted to reduce tax liability.13

The Refundable Credit as a Counterbalance

Because the Michigan R&D credit is refundable, it provides a cash infusion that essentially offsets the higher tax payments caused by the amortization requirement.5 For example, if a company pays $1 million in R&D wages, it can only deduct a small portion for state income tax purposes in Year 1, but it could potentially receive a refundable credit for over $100,000 in that same year.12 This makes the credit a vital liquidity tool in a tax environment that otherwise penalizes heavy R&D spending through mandatory capitalization.

Comprehensive Example: “TechFlow Michigan”

To illustrate the interplay of wages, base amounts, and taxpayer classification, consider “TechFlow Michigan,” a software development firm.

Company Profile and Wage Identification

In 2025, TechFlow has 150 employees, all based in Grand Rapids and Kalamazoo. It identifies the following wage expenses for its new cybersecurity project:

• Direct Performance: 20 Senior Developers at $120,000 each = $2,400,000.
• Direct Supervision: 2 Team Leads who spend 100% of their time directing the developers at $150,000 each = $300,000.
• Direct Support: 1 QA Tester who spends 90% of their time on the project ($90,000) and 1 Administrative Assistant who spends 10% of their time filing project reports ($5,000).

• Under the “Substantially All” rule, the QA Tester’s full $90,000 qualifies.14
• The Administrative Assistant’s $5,000 is excluded as “indirect” support.14

Total 2025 Qualified Wages: $2,790,000.

Base Amount Calculation

TechFlow began its Michigan R&D operations in late 2023. Its historical Michigan QREs are:

• 2022: $0 (Not in operation)
• 2023: $400,000
• 2024: $600,000
• Base Amount: $(0 + 400,000 + 600,000) / 3 = \$333,333$.1

Unadjusted Credit Calculation

As a small business (<250 employees), TechFlow uses the 3% and 15% rates.1

1. Base Layer: 3% of $333,333 = $10,000.
2. Excess Layer: 15% of ($2,790,000 – $333,333) = 15% of $2,456,667 = $368,500.
3. Total Calculated Credit: $378,500.
4. Application of Cap: The credit is capped at $250,000 for small businesses.1

Proration and Final Award

TechFlow submits a tentative claim for $250,000 by April 1, 2026. If the Department of Treasury determines that the small business pool is over-subscribed by 20%, TechFlow’s final awarded credit would be:

• Final Credit: $250,000 \times 0.80 = \$200,000$.1

Special Considerations for Flow-Through Entities (FTEs)

For partnerships, S-Corporations, and LLCs, the R&D credit represents a departure from traditional pass-through mechanics.1

Entity-Level Application

The credit is claimed by the FTE itself on its annual Sales, Use, and Withholding (SUW) return.10 This is particularly advantageous for businesses that may have many small partners or members; the entity receives the cash refund or tax offset directly, which it can then use to reinvest in its R&D facilities or workforce.10

Withholding Reductions

One of the most immediate benefits for FTEs is the ability to adjust periodic withholding payments. The Michigan Department of Treasury has indicated that once a tentative claim adjustment notice is issued, an FTE can reduce its associated withholding payments to reflect the anticipated credit, providing immediate cash flow throughout the tax year.13

Documentation and Audit Preparedness

Given the refundable nature of the credit and the strict geographic requirements, the Michigan Department of Treasury is expected to maintain rigorous audit standards.13 Taxpayers must be prepared to defend their “Wages for Qualified Services” with robust contemporaneous documentation.

Essential Records for Wages

To survive an audit, a business should maintain:

• Payroll Registers: Documenting all W-2 wages and identifying the specific employees claimed.14
• Time Tracking Data: For employees not meeting the 80% “Substantially All” threshold, detailed logs of hours spent on qualified vs. non-qualified tasks are essential.13
• Work Location Logs: Evidence that the work was performed in Michigan, such as badge swipe data, office leases, or telework agreements that specify a Michigan-based office as the primary duty station.3
• Project Documentation: Technical reports, design documents, and email chains that prove the “Four-Part Test” was met for each project.13

Conclusion: Strategic Value for the Michigan Business Ecosystem

The definition and application of Wages for Qualified Services under the Michigan R&D tax credit represent a significant shift toward an “innovation-first” economic policy. By adopting the technical definitions of IRC Section 41 while layering on strict geographic and administrative controls, Michigan has created an incentive that is both generous and fiscally responsible.

For the business professional, the takeaway is clear: the credit is not merely a year-end tax calculation but a year-round operational requirement. Success in claiming the credit—and maximizing the value of R&D wages—depends on proactive tracking of employee activities, geographic nexus, and adherence to the strict “Tentative Claim” deadlines. As Michigan continues to refine its guidance through future Revenue Administrative Bulletins, businesses that have already integrated these standards into their payroll and project management systems will be the most likely to reap the $100 million in annual rewards offered by the state. This credit stands as a cornerstone of Michigan’s strategy to retain its talent, support its universities, and lead the nation in the next generation of technological breakthroughs.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/