The Legal and Strategic Framework of Written Agreements for University Collaboration in the Michigan R&D Tax Credit

In the context of the Michigan R&D tax credit, a Written Agreement is a formal contract between a business and a state research university documenting a collaborative project to secure an additional 5% credit. It serves as the legal nexus required by the Department of Treasury to verify that research activities occurred within Michigan’s academic ecosystem.1

The reintroduction of the Michigan Research and Development (R&D) tax credit through Public Acts 186 and 187 of 2024 marks a transformative period for the state’s economic and innovation policy. By providing a specifically tailored incentive for university-industry collaboration, the Michigan legislature is attempting to bridge the gap between academic theory and commercial application. This policy recognizes that while internal corporate R&D is vital for incremental improvements, the radical breakthroughs often necessary for global competitiveness frequently emerge from the intersection of private capital and public research infrastructure. For a business to access the full range of these new benefits, particularly the 5% collaboration bonus, the “Written Agreement” stands as the primary evidentiary requirement. This document is not merely a technicality of the tax code; it is a strategic instrument that defines the scope, location, and nature of the innovation, ensuring that the state’s $100 million annual investment in R&D credits translates into tangible growth within the borders of Michigan.2

The Historical and Legislative Landscape of Michigan R&D Incentives

To understand the current importance of the Written Agreement, one must examine the vacuum it fills. For over a decade, Michigan was one of only 14 states in the nation—and the only one in the Midwest—without a dedicated R&D tax credit.4 This absence created a competitive disadvantage, as high-tech firms frequently cite R&D credits as a decisive factor when determining where to locate laboratories and manufacturing facilities.4 The previous iterations of innovation incentives, such as those found under the old Single Business Tax (SBT) and the subsequent Michigan Business Tax (MBT), were largely dismantled during the transition to the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) in 2012.1 The new legislation, signed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer on January 13, 2025, represents a bipartisan effort to reclaim Michigan’s status as a technological leader, specifically in the automotive, semiconductor, and life science sectors.1

The legislative framework is built upon House Bills 5100 and 5101, which established the primary credit structures for corporate taxpayers and flow-through entities, respectively.1 Complementary bills, including House Bill 4368 and 5099, provided the necessary definitions and administrative guidelines that the Department of Treasury now uses to oversee the program.8 This holistic approach ensures that the credit is not only a financial rebate but a regulated incentive that favors sustained investment over short-term spending.6

Primary Credit Structures and the Collaboration Bonus

The Michigan R&D credit is structured as a tiered, refundable incentive. Unlike the federal credit, which typically only rewards spending above a certain threshold, the Michigan credit offers a base level of support for all qualifying expenditures, with significant “jump-ups” for spending that exceeds a historical average.2 The Written Agreement for university collaboration functions as an “adder,” providing an extra 5% credit on the same qualifying research expenses (QREs) used to calculate the primary credit.2

Data synthesized from.1

The 5% bonus is specifically capped at $200,000 per year per taxpayer, and it requires the collaborative expenses to be incurred “pursuant to a written agreement”.1 This structure highlights the state’s intent to lower the cost of accessing Michigan’s premier research universities, which are some of the most expenditure-intensive institutions in the country.13

The Legal Anatomy of the Written Agreement

The Department of Treasury’s guidance emphasizes that the Written Agreement must be a formal, legally binding document executed before or during the period in which the research is conducted.1 While the Treasury has not issued a rigid template, the synthesis of Public Act 187 and related administrative notices reveals several mandatory components that must be present to withstand an audit.

Defining the Research University

The first legal requirement for a valid Written Agreement is the identification of a qualifying “Research University”.4 The law is explicit in its definition, ensuring that the tax benefit supports Michigan institutions. A research university is defined as a public university described in Section 4, 5, or 6 of Article VIII of the Michigan State Constitution of 1963, or an independent nonprofit college or university located within the state.3

The public institutions covered under this definition include the state’s major research hubs:

• The University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, Dearborn, Flint)
• Michigan State University
• Wayne State University
• Michigan Technological University
• Western Michigan University
• Grand Valley State University
• And other recognized state colleges.14

The inclusion of “independent nonprofit colleges” expands the scope to include private institutions that maintain significant research footprints, provided they are physically located in Michigan.2

Mandatory Clauses and Documentation Standards

According to legislative analysis and Department of Treasury directives, the Written Agreement must contain specific data points to verify the eligibility of the collaborative expenses.3 These include:

• A Detailed Project Scope: The agreement must describe the specific research activities being undertaken. To qualify, these activities must meet the “Four-Part Test” established under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41(b): they must be for a permitted purpose, eliminate technical uncertainty, involve a process of experimentation, and be technological in nature.6
• Geographic Specificity: The document must explicitly state that the research will be conducted at facilities within Michigan. Expenses for research conducted outside the state are strictly ineligible for the credit and cannot be used to reach the base amount.11
• Term and Duration: The agreement must have a clearly defined start and end date. Only expenses incurred during the active term of the agreement—and within the relevant tax year—are eligible for the 5% bonus.17
• Relationship Acknowledgment: The agreement should clarify that the business is the “authorized business” and the university is the research partner, ensuring that the roles are distinct for tax reporting purposes.17
• Audit Clauses: The Treasury may require the business to provide a copy of this agreement upon request. Therefore, the agreement should include provisions for data sharing and records retention relevant to the tax credit claim.4

Administrative Guidance from the Michigan Department of Treasury

The Department of Treasury serves as the gatekeeper for the R&D credit, and its guidance focuses heavily on the “Tentative Claim” process.5 Because the total statewide credit is capped at $100 million per year, the Treasury must have a mechanism to prorate claims if they exceed the available funds.1

The Two-Step Claim Process

The Treasury has established a two-step procedure that all businesses, large and small, must follow to claim the R&D credit and the university bonus.5

Step 1: The Tentative Claim

Before a business can claim the credit on its tax return, it must file a “Tentative Claim” with the Department of Treasury.9 This filing is separate from the annual tax return and is used to alert the state to the total potential credit demand.23

• Deadline for 2025 Activities: April 1, 2026.1
• Deadline for Subsequent Years: March 15 of the following year.8
• Requirement for Actuals: The Treasury has clarified that tentative claims should be based on actual, realized expenses, not estimates, to ensure the accuracy of the proration calculation.15

Step 2: The Annual Return

Once the Treasury reviews all tentative claims and publishes any necessary proration adjustments on its website, the business then reports the finalized credit amount on its annual income tax return (for CIT taxpayers) or withholding return (for flow-through entities).15

Proration and the Small Business Reserve

One of the most complex aspects of the Treasury’s guidance is the proration mechanism.7 The state has reserved $25 million of the $100 million annual cap specifically for small businesses (fewer than 250 employees).2

This system ensures that small innovators are not crowded out by large multinational corporations, while still providing a predictable framework for large-scale R&D investments.2

The Strategic Role of “Written Agreements” in the Innovation Ecosystem

Beyond the tax benefit, the Written Agreement represents a fundamental shift in how Michigan intends to compete globally. The state’s research universities are not just educational institutions; they are massive economic engines with billions of dollars in research expenditures.14

Economic Statistics of Michigan Research Hubs

Data from the Research Universities for Michigan (RU4M) alliance illustrates the depth of the resources available to businesses that execute collaboration agreements.14

Data synthesized from.13

By requiring a Written Agreement, Michigan incentivizes businesses to tap into these pre-existing hubs of excellence.6 For a small firm, a partnership with U-M or MSU provides access to laboratory equipment and doctoral expertise that would be otherwise cost-prohibitive. The 5% tax credit bonus effectively functions as a state-sponsored discount on these high-level research services.1

Decoupling from IRC 174 and Cash Flow Implications

A critical, nuanced point of Michigan law is its decoupling from federal Section 174 rules.23 Since 2022, federal law has required businesses to capitalize and amortize R&D expenses over five years rather than deducting them immediately. Michigan, however, has chosen to maintain a more taxpayer-friendly approach, allowing for different treatment or providing this refundable credit to offset the federal tax burden.23 This decoupling makes the Michigan R&D credit—and the university bonus in particular—a vital source of immediate liquidity for R&D-heavy firms that may be facing significant federal tax increases due to amortization.23

Operationalizing the University Collaboration Bonus: A Detailed Example

To understand how the Written Agreement and the credit calculation function in practice, consider the following hypothetical case study of a Michigan-based technology company.

Case Study: Kinetic Battery Systems (KBS)

Kinetic Battery Systems is a medium-sized enterprise with 150 employees, classifying it as a “Small Business” for the purpose of the Michigan R&D credit.2 In early 2025, KBS enters into a Written Agreement with Michigan Technological University (MTU) to research a new solid-state battery electrolyte.29

The Written Agreement Provisions:

• Partner: Michigan Technological University.2
• Project: “Solid-State Electrolyte Stability Study.”
• Location: Research conducted at the MTU campus in Houghton, MI.15
• Cost: KBS agrees to pay MTU $300,000 for specialized testing and laboratory access.
• Internal KBS Labor: KBS assigns three engineers to work alongside MTU, totaling $400,000 in qualifying wages.5

Establishing the Base Amount:

KBS’s Michigan-based R&D spending for the three prior calendar years was:

• 2022: $200,000
• 2023: $250,000
• 2024: $300,000
• Average Base Amount: $250,000.4

2025 Qualifying Research Expenses (QRE):

In 2025, KBS spends a total of $1,000,000 on Michigan R&D, which includes the $700,000 related to the MTU collaboration and $300,000 in other internal R&D projects.2

Credit Calculation Breakdown:

1. Base Layer (3% up to base amount): $250,000 x 3% = $7,500.10
2. Excess Layer (15% above base amount for Small Business): ($1,000,000 – $250,000) x 15% = $112,500.2
3. University Collaboration Bonus (5% of collaborative expenses): $700,000 x 5% = $35,000.1
   Note: The bonus is based on the collaborative QRE incurred under the Written Agreement.

Total Tentative Credit: $7,500 + $112,500 + $35,000 = $155,000.

Because $155,000 is below the $250,000 annual cap for small businesses, and because KBS is a small business, they are likely to receive the full amount unless total small business claims statewide exceed the $25 million reserve, triggering proration.2

Compliance and Audit Readiness: The Role of the Written Agreement

The refundability of the Michigan R&D credit makes it a high-value target for state audits.4 The Department of Treasury has explicitly stated that it may require a copy of the Written Agreement as a condition of awarding the additional 5% credit.4

Best Practices for Documentation

To ensure compliance, businesses must go beyond the minimum requirements of a standard contract.6 Best practices include:

• Contemporaneous Execution: The agreement should be signed before the research begins. Backdated agreements are a common “red flag” for auditors and can lead to the disqualification of the entire bonus.31
• Detailed Invoicing: Invoices from the university should clearly reference the project title found in the Written Agreement and provide a breakdown of costs that align with IRC Section 41 definitions (wages, supplies, and contract research).5
• Technical Evidence: Businesses should maintain laboratory notebooks, progress reports, and email correspondence that demonstrate the active collaboration between the company and the university. A “hands-off” financial contribution to a university may be viewed as a donation rather than a collaborative research project, which would be ineligible for the credit.6
• Four-Year Retention: Michigan tax law typically follows a four-year statute of limitations for audits. All R&D records, especially the Written Agreement, must be retained for at least four years following the filing of the claim.2

Consequences of Non-Compliance

The failure to produce a valid Written Agreement during an audit has several significant consequences 4:

1. Forfeiture of the 5% Bonus: The immediate loss of the collaboration credit, which can be as high as $200,000 per year.10
2. Potential Disqualification of Base QREs: If the university expenses were also used to meet the base amount or the excess credit, and the partnership is deemed invalid, the entire credit calculation could be compromised.31
3. Penalties and Interest: As a refundable credit, an overclaim is treated as an underpayment of tax once disallowed, leading to statutory penalties and interest that can significantly exceed the original tax savings.31

Competitive Implications for the Midwest and Beyond

Michigan’s decision to re-establish this credit, with a heavy emphasis on university collaboration, is a direct response to the aggressive tax policies of neighboring states like Ohio and Indiana.4 By integrating the “Written Agreement” as a core requirement, Michigan is betting that its academic institutions—U-M, MSU, and others—are its greatest competitive advantage.13

Comparative State Landscapes

While many states offer R&D credits, Michigan’s 15% rate for small businesses and its 5% university bonus are among the most generous in the region.10 Ohio, for example, offers a non-refundable credit, whereas Michigan’s credit is fully refundable, providing immediate cash flow to startups that may not yet have a tax liability.1

Data synthesized from.1

This comparison underscores why the Written Agreement is a critical document for businesses operating in Michigan. It is the key to unlocking a level of state support that is largely unavailable in other jurisdictions.6

Future Outlook and Legislative Reporting

The Michigan R&D credit program includes built-in accountability measures. Under House Bill 5102, the Department of Treasury, in cooperation with the Michigan Strategic Fund, must submit an annual report to the Governor and the Legislature by July 1 of each year.8

This report must include:

• The number of businesses filing tentative claims.8
• The name of each authorized business and the amount of credit allowed.8
• A description of the R&D investments that formed the basis for the credits.17

This transparency means that the “Written Agreement” and the resulting research will be part of the public record regarding the effectiveness of Michigan’s innovation policy.8 For businesses, this adds a layer of reputational importance to their university collaborations, as their role in driving the state’s technological future will be explicitly documented and reported to state leaders.1

Conclusion

The “Written Agreement” required for university collaboration is the foundational document for any business seeking to maximize the benefits of the new Michigan R&D tax credit.1 It serves as a legal bridge between the private sector and Michigan’s world-class research institutions, facilitating a specialized 5% bonus that can significantly offset the costs of high-level innovation.5 By adhering to the Department of Treasury’s strict tentative claim deadlines—specifically April 1, 2026, for the inaugural 2025 tax year—and maintaining meticulous records of these agreements, Michigan businesses can secure a vital source of non-dilutive capital.8

As the state moves forward with its strategy to decouple from federal expense treatment and prioritize immediate liquidity for innovators, the Written Agreement will remain the primary tool for verifying that tax incentives are being used for their intended purpose: the advancement of science and the strengthening of the Michigan economy.23 For business leaders, the message is clear: successful R&D in Michigan starts with a formal partnership, a well-drafted agreement, and a clear vision for collaborative success.6

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/