Technical Analysis of the Funded Research Exclusion in the Mississippi Research and Development Tax Credit Framework

In the Mississippi research incentive framework, “Grant, Contract, or Other Funding” refers to external financial support that eliminates a taxpayer’s primary economic risk, thereby disqualifying specific expenditures from eligibility for state-level tax credits or rebates. This exclusion ensures that Mississippi’s fiscal resources are directed only toward businesses that personally bear the financial burden of innovation and maintain the exclusive rights to exploit resulting intellectual property.

The interpretation and application of the funded research exclusion require a sophisticated understanding of both statutory language and administrative guidance from the Mississippi Department of Revenue (MDOR) and the Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning (IHL). Unlike the federal Research and Development (R&D) tax credit under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, which many states mirror, Mississippi utilizes a more targeted system comprising the Research and Development Skills Tax Credit and the Academic Research Investor Rebate under the Strengthening Mississippi Academic Research Through (SMART) Business Act.1 The foundational principle across these programs is that the state will not provide a second layer of subsidy for research that is already being paid for by a third party, whether that be a federal grant, a private commercial contract, or a government-subsidized partnership.3 This technical report examines the nuances of this exclusion, the administrative protocols for certification, and the strategic implications for businesses navigating Mississippi’s innovation-driven tax landscape.

The Statutory Basis of Research Incentives in Mississippi

The legislative intent behind Mississippi’s research incentives is to stimulate private investment and foster a high-skilled workforce within the state’s borders. The Mississippi Code establishes several distinct paths for companies to recoup investment costs, but each path is guarded by specific definitions of “qualified” activities and costs. The two primary mechanisms are the R&D Skills Tax Credit, which focuses on human capital, and the SMART Business Act, which focuses on institutional partnerships.2

The Research and Development Skills Tax Credit

The Research and Development Skills Tax Credit, codified under Mississippi Code Section 27-7-22.20, is an income tax credit aimed at the creation and retention of high-tech jobs. The credit allows an eligible business to claim $1,000 per employee per year for a five-year period for any position that requires research or development skills.5 Unlike spending-based credits, this is a head-count-based incentive, yet it remains subject to the overarching rule that the activities must constitute genuine research and development as opposed to routine production or funded service work.5

The Department of Revenue maintains strict educational and professional standards for this credit. A qualifying position must require a minimum of a bachelor’s degree in a scientific or technical field from an accredited institution, and the employee must be compensated at a professional level while working in their specific area of expertise.2 Furthermore, the MDOR stipulates that the employee must have at least two years of job-related experience before the credit becomes available.2 Because the credit is limited to 50% of the company’s state income tax liability, businesses must carefully project their tax position before relying on these credits for cash flow.5

The SMART Business Act and Academic Research Rebates

The Strengthening Mississippi Academic Research Through (SMART) Business Act, established in 2013, represents a more aggressive approach to university-industry collaboration. This program provides a 25% rebate of qualified research costs to investors who partner with a Mississippi public university or research corporation.3 The SMART Act is managed primarily by the IHL Board of Trustees, which serves as the gatekeeper for certification, while the MDOR handles the actual issuance of the rebate from current income tax collections.3

The concept of “qualified research” under the SMART Act is defined as a systematic investigative process undertaken for the purpose of discovering information.3 However, the statute explicitly excludes research to the extent expenses are already being funded by any grant, contract, or otherwise by another person or governmental entity.3 This language creates a high bar for documentation, as applicants must certify that they are the sole source of the “risk capital” involved in the partnership.4

Analysis of “Grant, Contract, or Other Funding”

The phrase “Grant, Contract, or Other Funding” is more than a simple list; it is a legal framework for identifying the ultimate financial stakeholder in a research project. The MDOR and IHL interpret this phrase through the lenses of economic risk and substantial rights, mirroring federal concepts but applying them with state-specific strictness.4

The Doctrine of Economic Risk

In the context of the SMART Act, the “investor” is the entity that pays a university for research. If that investor is being reimbursed by a federal Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant or a subcontract from a prime defense contractor, the investor is not bearing the economic risk.3 If the research project fails to yield results, the investor is not out-of-pocket for the funded portion; the grantor or the prime contractor is the one who has lost the capital.8

The administrative guidance provided in IHL’s application materials requires a clear budget that separates funded components from non-funded ones.10 If a $500,000 research project is supported by a $200,000 federal grant, only the remaining $300,000 of “at-risk” capital is eligible for the 25% rebate.4 The state view is that providing a rebate on the $200,000 would constitute a windfall for the company, as they are being paid by the federal government and then effectively receiving an additional 25% “bonus” from the state of Mississippi for money that was never theirs to begin with.4

Substantial Rights and the Power of “Or Otherwise”

The inclusion of the phrase “or otherwise” in the statutory definition of funded research serves as a catch-all for any financial arrangement that shifts the burden of cost away from the taxpayer.3 This includes cooperative agreements, joint ventures where a partner covers the costs, or licensing agreements where the research is prepaid by a future user.3

Furthermore, for research to be non-funded, the taxpayer must maintain “substantial rights” in the results. If a contract stipulates that the funding entity (e.g., the Department of Defense) owns all resulting intellectual property and the taxpayer has no right to use or exploit the findings without further payment or permission, the research is considered “funded” by that entity.8 In Mississippi, the IHL requires a signed research agreement that clearly outlines the ownership and usage rights of the private investor to ensure the investment is genuine and not a service-for-hire arrangement.10

Multi-Faceted Funding Structures and Pro-Rata Exclusions

In modern R&D, it is common for a project to have “blended” funding. A company might use a mix of its own revenue, venture capital, and a state-level bridge grant. The MDOR guidance suggests that each funding source must be analyzed. Venture capital is generally considered the company’s own capital (at-risk), whereas a state grant specifically designated for research costs would be subtracted from the “qualified research costs” total.3

Administrative Guidance and Certification Protocols

Mississippi’s R&D incentives are not self-executing. They require a rigorous, multi-stage application process that involves both the Department of Revenue and the Institutions of Higher Learning. This structure is designed to prevent fraudulent claims and ensure that only projects meeting the “Mississippi-based” and “non-funded” criteria receive state support.2

The Pre-Approval Requirement for Skills Credits

For the R&D Skills Tax Credit, a business must obtain authorization from the MDOR before taking the credit on its income tax return.2 The process begins with a formal letter of request submitted to the MDOR’s Income and Franchise Tax Bureau. This letter serves as the evidentiary basis for the credit and must include highly specific data points for each employee and position being claimed.5

Taxpayers are cautioned not to claim the credit until they receive a formal letter of authorization.2 Once received, a copy of the letter and a computation schedule must be attached to every tax return on which the credit is claimed.2

The SMART Business Act Application Portal

The SMART Business Act utilizes a digital application portal hosted by the IHL. Investors must complete the application in a single session, uploading several critical documents that testify to the non-funded nature of the research.10 One unique requirement is a letter from the MDOR certifying that the applicant is current in all tax filings.10

A central component of the SMART application is the “Research Agreement”.4 This agreement must be a new contract entered into with a Mississippi public university or research corporation. Existing agreements or projects that began before the application and approval are ineligible for the 25% rebate.10 Furthermore, the investor must certify that no portion of the research is funded by any grant, contract, or otherwise by another person or governmental entity.10

The Role of Research Corporations

Mississippi law (Section 37-147-15) allows universities to form “Research Corporations” to manage their intellectual property and research partnerships. For the purposes of the SMART Act, payments made to these corporations—such as the Mississippi State University Research and Technology Corporation—are treated as payments to the university itself, provided the corporation is wholly owned by or affiliated with the college and all profits inure to the benefit of the college.3

Impact of Recent Legislative Changes: H.B. 1733

The most significant recent development in Mississippi’s R&D tax landscape is the passage of House Bill 1733 in April 2023.15 This law directly addresses the federal changes to IRC Section 174, which now requires businesses to capitalize and amortize R&D expenses over five years (for domestic) or fifteen years (for foreign research) instead of deducting them immediately.15

Decoupling from Federal Amortization

Mississippi has chosen to “decouple” from the federal mandate. Under H.B. 1733, Mississippi allows businesses to elect to fully and immediately deduct research or experimental (R&E) expenditures in the year they are incurred.15 This creates a substantial timing benefit for Mississippi companies. For every $1 million spent on R&D, a company can take a full $1 million deduction on its Mississippi return in Year 1, while only taking a $100,000 deduction on its federal return (due to the mid-year convention and 5-year amortization).13

Interaction with the “Funded” Rule

While H.B. 1733 allows for a 100% deduction, it does not change the fact that these expenses must still meet the definition of R&E expenditures under the “experimental or laboratory sense”.15 The MDOR follows federal guidelines (Notice 2023-63) for identifying what costs are incident to development.13 If the research is funded, the deduction may still be available as a business expense under Section 162, but it loses the “special” status of an R&E deduction under Section 174 for Mississippi tax purposes, which would impact the taxpayer’s ability to claim R&D-specific credits in conjunction with the deduction.13

Case Study: BioAgra Innovation Project

To clarify the application of the funded research exclusion, consider the case of BioAgra, a biotechnology firm based in the Mississippi Delta. BioAgra enters into a $1,200,000 research agreement with Mississippi State University (MSU) to develop a drought-resistant soybean strain.

Step 1: Analyzing the Funding Sources

BioAgra finances the $1.2 million project through the following sources:

1. $400,000 from a federal USDA Grant.
2. $300,000 from a private contract with a national seed distributor (who will own 50% of the patent).
3. $500,000 from BioAgra’s internal venture-backed capital.

Step 2: Applying the Funded Research Exclusion

Under the SMART Business Act, the IHL and MDOR will analyze the sources of the $1.2 million.

• The $400,000 USDA Grant is a “grant from a governmental entity” and is excluded.3
• The $300,000 from the seed distributor is “funding by another person” and is excluded.3
• The $500,000 of internal capital is the only portion that meets the definition of “at-risk” qualified research costs.3

Step 3: Calculating the Rebate

The rebate is calculated based solely on the non-funded portion:

$$\text{Rebate} = 500,000 \times 0.25 = 125,000$$

If BioAgra had attempted to claim the rebate on the full $1.2 million, the IHL would have rejected the budget during the certification phase, as the research agreement and the budget would clearly show the involvement of the USDA and the third-party partner.10

Step 4: Skills Credit Interaction

Additionally, BioAgra hires three Ph.D. chemists specifically for this project, paying each $120,000 per year.

• Qualified Chemists: 3
• Credit Amount: $1,000 \times 3 = 3,000$ per year.
• Total over 5 years: $15,000.5

The Skills Credit is not reduced by the funded nature of the project itself, provided the chemists are BioAgra employees and not employees of the university or the seed distributor.5 However, if the seed distributor was paying the chemists’ salaries directly through a service contract, BioAgra would not be the “employer” for the purposes of the credit.5

Statistical Overview of Mississippi Research Incentives

While the actual project-by-project usage of the R&D Skills Credit is often confidential in MDA and MDOR reports, the SMART Business Act provides more transparency through its grant award listings and statutory caps.

SMART Act Fiscal Performance

The SMART Act is subject to a statewide fiscal year cap. Recent legislative sessions have adjusted this cap to ensure the program remains sustainable while continuing to attract high-value partnerships.3

In 2024, the IHL awarded over $1.1 million across 17 distinct projects.10 This indicates that the average award is approximately $64,700 per project, suggesting that many investors are utilizing the credit for smaller-scale, targeted research initiatives rather than hitting the $1 million individual cap.10

University Distribution of 2024 Research Grants

The distribution of research grants across Mississippi’s research universities highlights the diverse technical landscape where “funded” vs. “non-funded” analyses are most frequent.10

Strategic Considerations for Businesses

Navigating the Mississippi R&D tax credit framework requires more than just technical scientific work; it requires sophisticated legal and accounting strategy to maximize benefits while avoiding audit pitfalls related to funded research.

The Problem of “Double Subsidy”

Mississippi’s regulatory framework is specifically designed to prevent a “double subsidy.” This occurs when a company receives a federal grant for a project and then seeks a state tax credit for the same expenses.4 From a policy perspective, the state believes that if the federal government is already paying 100% of the costs, the company needs no further incentive to perform the research.5

However, companies can strategically use “unfunded” stages of a project to claim state benefits. For example, if a project has three phases:

• Phase 1: Conceptualization (Self-funded)
• Phase 2: Prototyping (Federal Grant)
• Phase 3: Validation (Self-funded)

The company should only apply for the SMART rebate for Phases 1 and 3.4 Applying for the rebate in Phase 2 would likely lead to a denial of the entire SMART Business Certificate if the funding is not clearly segregated.10

The “Shrink-Back” Rule in Practice

When a company performs a large research project that is partially funded, they should apply the “shrink-back” rule.12 This involves looking at the smallest “business component” that can independently meet the R&D criteria and is unfunded. If the overall project is a “New Aircraft Engine” (funded by NASA), but a specific sub-component—”Improved Fuel Injector Valve”—is developed using internal funds and will be used across other commercial products, that sub-component may qualify for the Skills Credit even if the larger engine project is disqualified as funded research.12

Audit Defense and Contemporaneous Records

The MDOR has become increasingly rigorous in auditing R&D claims, particularly with the transition to the new online application system in 2024.20 Businesses must maintain an “audit-ready” file that includes:

1. Fully Executed Research Agreements: Ensuring the language matches the SMART Act application exactly.10
2. Proof of Payment: Cancelled checks or bank wires showing the taxpayer, not a third party, paid the university.10
3. W-2 Data and Job Descriptions: Demonstrating that Skills Credit employees were engaged in qualified R&D and not funded contract services.1
4. Accounting Ledger: Explicitly showing the “netting out” of any grant or contract revenue against research expenses.

Comparisons with Alternative Incentives

In some cases, a company may find that the R&D Skills Credit or the SMART rebate is not the most advantageous route, especially if they are heavily funded by external grants. Mississippi offers several “universal” or “broad-based” incentives that may be more compatible with funded research.6

mFlex: The Flexible Tax Incentive

The Mississippi Flexible Tax Incentive (mFlex) is a “one-application” program that provides a universal credit against income, franchise, sales, and use taxes.6 For research and development facilities, mFlex can be more attractive because it provides a 7% credit on non-manufacturing equipment and a 15% credit on expected annual payroll.22

Critically, mFlex is an investment-based and payroll-based credit. While it still requires a “qualified economic development project,” its calculation is less sensitive to the “funded research” distinction than the SMART Act.21 However, the minimum threshold for mFlex ($2.5 million investment or 10 new jobs) is much higher than for the R&D Skills Credit (no minimum) or the SMART rebate (no minimum investment).21

Growth and Prosperity (GAP) Areas

For R&D facilities locating in distressed counties, the GAP program offers a 10-year exemption from franchise tax and sales/use tax on component materials.22 This incentive is “statutory,” meaning it is based on location and job creation rather than the specific funding source of the research being conducted.22

Conclusion

The Mississippi research and development tax credit framework represents a nuanced balance between economic stimulation and fiscal responsibility. The exclusion of “Grant, Contract, or Other Funding” is the central mechanism by which the state ensures that its tax benefits are not diluted by projects already supported by external capital. For the taxpayer, this creates a landscape where documentation and strategic project segregation are paramount.

The 2023 and 2024 administrative shifts, including the decoupling from federal Section 174 amortization and the move to mandatory online applications, signal a Mississippi tax environment that is becoming both more generous in its timing benefits and more rigorous in its oversight. Businesses that successfully navigate these rules—by carefully managing university research agreements, maintaining precise at-risk capital budgets, and obtaining proper pre-approvals from the MDOR and IHL—can significantly reduce the cost of innovation within the state. As Mississippi continues to prioritize high-growth sectors like biotechnology and aerospace, the “funded research” analysis will remain a critical hurdle for any firm looking to leverage the state’s aggressive innovation incentives. Professionals must remain diligent in their reading of IHL guidelines and MDOR bulletins to ensure that the “other funding” catch-all does not inadvertently disqualify their most valuable R&D investments.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/