The Strategic Impact of House Bill 1733 on Mississippi Research and Development Taxation

House Bill 1733 allows Mississippi businesses to immediately deduct research and experimental expenses and claim 100% bonus depreciation on capital investments, bypassing restrictive federal amortization requirements. By decoupling from the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the state restores immediate cost recovery to incentivize innovation and infrastructure growth.1

Legislative Context and the Decoupling Strategy

The enactment of House Bill 1733 (H.B. 1733) on March 27, 2023, represents a critical juncture in the evolution of Mississippi’s fiscal policy.3 To understand the significance of this legislation, one must first look at the federal tax landscape that preceded it. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) introduced a significant change to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 174, which governs the treatment of research and experimental (R&E) expenditures.2 For decades, businesses were permitted to choose between immediately expensing R&E costs or amortizing them over time. However, starting in the 2022 tax year, the TCJA eliminated the immediate deduction option, mandating that domestic R&E expenses be capitalized and amortized over five years, while foreign expenditures were extended to a fifteen-year period.1

Mississippi, like many states, traditionally maintained a high degree of conformity with federal tax definitions to simplify administration and compliance.2 The shift toward mandatory amortization at the federal level created a “tax cliff” for innovative companies, effectively increasing their taxable income by denying the immediate recognition of research costs.2 H.B. 1733 was specifically designed to protect Mississippi-based enterprises from this federal policy shift.1 By amending Section 27-7-17 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, the state legislature chose to “decouple” from the post-2021 federal version of Section 174.3

The strategy of decoupling is not merely a technical adjustment but a deliberate economic statement. It signals that Mississippi prioritizes current-year liquidity for businesses engaged in technical endeavors.7 The legislative history of H.B. 1733 reflects a broad bipartisan consensus on this point. The bill was introduced by Representative John Thomas Lamar on February 21, 2023, and moved through the House and Senate with overwhelming support, eventually passing the House 111-0 and the Senate 52-0.3 This unanimous approval underscores the state’s commitment to maintaining a competitive tax environment relative to neighboring states and the federal government.7

Statutory Mechanics of Section 27-7-17 Amendments

The primary mechanism of H.B. 1733 is the modification of the deductions allowed for computing net income under state law.3 The amendments focus on three distinct areas of capital recovery: research expenditures, bonus depreciation for qualified property, and Section 179 expensing.1

Specified Research or Experimental Expenditures

Under the new law, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, a taxpayer may elect to treat specified research or experimental expenditures as expenses that are not chargeable to a capital account.5 This allows the full amount of such expenditures to be deducted in the year they are paid or incurred.1 The statute defines “specified research or experimental expenditures” by referencing the definition found in 26 USCS Section 174 as it existed on January 1, 2021.5 This date is critical because it captures the federal definition before the TCJA amortization requirements took effect.2

The law provides that these expenditures shall remain allowable as a full and immediate expense deduction notwithstanding any future changes to the federal IRC.1 This creates a permanent state-level incentive that is insulated from federal legislative volatility.1 However, the legislation acknowledges that some taxpayers may prefer federal conformity for the sake of simplicity or long-term tax planning. Therefore, taxpayers are granted the option to alternatively follow the federal amortization schedule provided in IRC Section 174.1

Permanent 100% Bonus Depreciation

In addition to R&E expensing, H.B. 1733 addresses the broader category of capital investment. The federal government has historically provided “bonus depreciation” under IRC Section 168(k) to encourage investment in equipment and infrastructure.1 However, the federal bonus depreciation rate began to phase out in 2023, dropping from 100% to 80%, with further annual 20% reductions scheduled until it reaches zero in 2027.1

Mississippi’s H.B. 1733 explicitly rejects this phase-out. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, expenditures for business assets that are “qualified property” or “qualified improvement property” (QIP) are eligible for 100% bonus depreciation in Mississippi.1 The state’s definition of these property types is tethered to the federal definitions as of January 1, 2021.5

Section 179 Property Conformity

For smaller capital investments, Mississippi now conforms to the federal Section 179 expensing provisions.9 This allows taxpayers to elect to treat the cost of any Section 179 property placed in service during the year as an expense rather than a capital charge.1 This alignment ensures that Mississippi businesses can benefit from the generous federal thresholds—which often exceed $1 million—without creating a state-federal discrepancy for small-scale equipment purchases.1

Integration with the Mississippi R&D Skills Tax Credit

H.B. 1733 does not exist in a vacuum; its primary purpose is to enhance the existing suite of incentives for high-tech industries in the state. One of the most relevant neighboring statutes is the Research and Development Skills Tax Credit, which is governed by Miss. Code Ann. Section 57-73-21(6).12 While H.B. 1733 focuses on the deductibility of expenses (reducing taxable income), the Skills Tax Credit provides a direct reduction of tax liability based on headcount.13

Eligibility and Qualitative Requirements

The R&D Skills Tax Credit is a hiring incentive rather than a spending incentive. It provides a $1,000 annual credit for each net new full-time employee in a position requiring research and development skills.13 To qualify, a position must meet a rigorous set of criteria that ensures the credit is supporting high-value employment.13

The employee must hold a bachelor’s or higher degree in a scientific or technical field of study from an accredited institution.13 Furthermore, the individual must be employed specifically in their area of expertise and compensated at a professional level.13 State regulations further clarify that the employee must have at least two years of job-related experience to be considered for the credit.15 Typical qualifying roles include chemists, engineers, and software developers.12

Quantitative Limitations and Carryforwards

The utility of the Skills Tax Credit is subject to certain statutory limits. The total amount of the credit, often used in combination with other job tax credits or headquarters relocation credits, is limited to 50% of the taxpayer’s Mississippi income tax liability for the year.13 If a company’s credit exceeds this 50% threshold, the unused portion is not refunded but may be carried forward for a period of up to five years.13

The relationship between H.B. 1733 and the Skills Tax Credit is complementary. A company developing a new pharmaceutical product in Mississippi can use H.B. 1733 to deduct the full cost of laboratory equipment and raw materials in the first year, thereby significantly lowering their taxable income.1 Simultaneously, they can claim the $1,000 credit for each scientist on staff to further reduce the tax they owe on the remaining income.13

The SMART Act: Academic Research Investor Rebate

The Strengthening Mississippi Academic Research Through Business (SMART) Act provides another layer of support for research activities, specifically those conducted in partnership with state universities.15 Established in 2013 and recently updated, the SMART Act focuses on bridging the gap between private industry and academic expertise.17

Rebate Mechanics and Funding

Unlike a tax credit, which is applied against a return, the SMART Act offers a cash rebate for “qualified research costs” paid to a Mississippi public university or a university research corporation.15

Collaborative Requirements

To access the SMART Act rebate, a company must enter into a new research agreement with a Mississippi university.17 Research that began prior to the application and approval process is ineligible for the rebate.17 The investor must submit an application to the IHL, including a detailed budget and research plan.16 Once the research is conducted and paid for, the investor submits proof of payment and a SMART Business Certificate to the Mississippi Department of Revenue to claim their rebate.16

This program is particularly attractive for industries that require advanced laboratory facilities or academic specialization that may be too costly to maintain in-house. H.B. 1733 ensures that the portion of the research costs not covered by the 25% rebate remains fully deductible for state tax purposes in the year it is incurred, maximizing the net benefit of the academic partnership.1

Local Revenue Office Guidance and Technical Notices

The Mississippi Department of Revenue (DOR) has issued specific guidance to assist taxpayers in implementing the changes introduced by H.B. 1733. The primary administrative document is the “Depreciation Notice” released on October 20, 2023.9 This guidance clarifies the election process and the necessary reporting steps for different entity types.

Election Procedures for Corporations and Pass-Through Entities

Taxpayers wishing to utilize the immediate expensing of R&E or 100% bonus depreciation must make a formal election on their Mississippi income tax return.10 This is not an automatic process; the taxpayer must actively choose the state-specific treatment over the federal treatment.10

• Corporations (Form 83-122): Taxpayers must check the boxes for “R&D Expense Election” and “Bonus Depreciation Election” on the Mississippi Net Taxable Income Schedule.10
• Pass-Through Entities (Form 84-122): S-corporations and partnerships must check the corresponding election boxes on their specific schedules to ensure the deductions are correctly calculated before being passed through to partners or shareholders.10

The DOR emphasizes that these elections must be made no later than the time prescribed by law for filing the return, including any valid extensions.5 Once made, the election for that tax year is irrevocable unless the Commissioner of Revenue explicitly authorizes a change in the accounting method.5

Recordkeeping and Internal Revenue Service Alignment

The DOR guidance clarifies that while Mississippi has decoupled from the federal treatment of these costs, it still relies on federal definitions for what constitutes a qualifying activity.9 Consequently, the documentation required to support an R&D credit at the federal level (IRS Form 6765) is the primary evidence used to support an R&E deduction at the state level.4

Taxpayers are advised to maintain contemporaneous records, including:

1. Project descriptions and technical objectives that address the elimination of uncertainty.14
2. Time-tracking data for personnel engaged in qualified research activities.14
3. Invoices and receipts for R&D supplies and contract research expenditures.14
4. Detailed asset schedules that distinguish between property eligible for 100% Mississippi bonus depreciation and property that must follow prior state depreciation rules.9

Reporting Changes for Tax Year 2024 and Beyond

Taxpayers should be aware of shifting federal requirements that may impact state documentation. The IRS has updated Form 6765 for tax years 2024 and 2025 to require more qualitative information, such as the number of business components being researched and the specific technical unknowns being investigated.25 While these federal changes are aimed at reducing “deficient analysis” in federal credit claims, they will likely set the standard for what the Mississippi DOR expects to see during a state-level audit of H.B. 1733 deductions.25

Impact on Pass-Through Entities and Owners

H.B. 1733 has specific implications for Pass-Through Entities (PTEs) such as S-corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), and partnerships. In Mississippi, the treatment of these entities was further refined by H.B. 1668, also passed in the 2023 session.1

Electing Pass-Through Entities

Mississippi allows PTEs to elect to pay tax at the entity level rather than passing the income through to owners’ individual tax returns.1 For an “Electing PTE,” the deductions authorized by H.B. 1733—such as R&E expensing and 100% bonus depreciation—are applied at the entity level to reduce the entity’s taxable income.1 This directly lowers the state tax paid by the entity.

Pro Rata Distribution of Credits

For non-electing PTEs or situations where the entity generates credits like the R&D Skills Tax Credit, the benefits are passed through to the owners based on their proportionate share of ownership.1 The owner then claims the credit on their individual Mississippi income tax return.1

A crucial provision in the law prevents the “taxing of the benefit”.29 Under standard tax principles, a credit based on an expense often requires an “add-back” to income to prevent a double benefit. Mississippi law confirms that if a credit is based on an expense, the amount of the credit taken must be added back to Mississippi taxable income in the year the credit is used.29 However, this does not apply to the deductions under H.B. 1733; it only applies when a taxpayer claims a credit for an expense they have already deducted from their income.29

Quantitative Example: Implementation for a Mississippi Manufacturing Enterprise

To illustrate the financial impact of H.B. 1733, consider “Delta Precision Aerospace,” a mid-sized engineering firm based in Jackson, Mississippi. In the 2024 tax year, the company undertakes a major initiative to develop a new composite wing structure.

Investment Profile

• Gross Receipts: $12,000,000
• Wages for R&D Engineers: $2,500,000 (10 new engineers hired)
• R&D Supplies and Prototypes: $500,000
• New Laboratory Testing Equipment: $2,000,000 (Qualified Property)
• Net Ordinary Income (Before R&D/Depreciation): $6,000,000

Comparison of Tax Treatments

*Federal R&E amortization (Section 174) for domestic costs is over 5 years, with a mid-year convention resulting in 10% in Year 1.2

**Federal bonus depreciation (Section 168k) for property placed in service in 2024 is 60%.1

Calculation of State Tax Savings

1. Reduction in Taxable Income: By using H.B. 1733, Delta Precision Aerospace reduces its state taxable income by an additional $3,500,000 compared to following federal rules ($5.0M vs $1.5M).
2. Income Tax Savings: At Mississippi’s 4.7% corporate tax rate for 2024, the immediate tax savings from the deduction alone is:
   
   $$3,500,000 \times 0.047 = \$164,500$$
   31
3. R&D Skills Tax Credit Application: The company hired 10 new engineers. Each engineer qualifies for a $1,000 credit.13
   $$10 \text{ employees} \times \$1,000 = \$10,000 \text{ credit}$$
4. Final Tax Liability:

• Tax on $1,000,000 income: $47,000.
• Less Skills Tax Credit: $10,000.
• Net State Tax Due: $37,000.

1. Comparative Advantage: If H.B. 1733 did not exist, the tax on $4,500,000 income would have been $211,500. Even after the $10,000 credit, the firm would owe $201,500. H.B. 1733 saved this single company $164,500 in Year 1 cash flow.

Fiscal and Economic Indicators

The passage of H.B. 1733 was driven by a belief that immediate cost recovery is the most efficient way to spur long-term economic growth. This “full expensing” model removes the tax code’s inherent bias against capital-intensive investments.7

Budgetary Performance

Critics of broad tax cuts often point to potential revenue instability. However, Mississippi’s revenue data following the implementation of these reforms has remained resilient. According to the Legislative Budget Office, December 2023 revenue collections were 4.3% above estimates.32 For the fiscal year-to-date through December, collections were $104 million higher than projected, despite the reduction in individual income tax rates and the introduction of H.B. 1733.32

This suggests that the economic activity generated by these incentives—particularly in the manufacturing and technical sectors—is providing a broader tax base that offsets the lower rates.7 The total state budget for the fiscal year was set at $7.52 billion, and the state continues to outpace these estimates.32

Comparative State Rankings

Prior to H.B. 1733, Mississippi did not offer any bonus depreciation, making it less attractive to large industrial projects compared to states that conformed to federal bonus depreciation.7 With the new law, Mississippi has leaped ahead of most of the country.

By becoming only the second state to offer permanent full expensing, Mississippi has significantly improved its ranking in the State Business Tax Climate Index.7 Projections suggest that once all phases of the state’s current tax reforms are implemented (including the elimination of the capital stock tax by 2028), Mississippi’s tax structure will rank among the top 15 in the nation.7

Future Outlook and Federal Contingencies

The sustainability of H.B. 1733 depends on its ability to withstand federal policy changes and the state’s continued fiscal discipline.

The “Lock-In” Provision

One of the most profound insights from the legislative text of H.B. 1733 is the “lock-in” of the January 1, 2021, federal definitions.5 By referencing a specific date in the past, the Mississippi legislature has ensured that any future federal attempts to further restrict research deductions will not automatically apply to Mississippi taxpayers.1 This provides businesses with “tax certainty,” which is often cited by corporate executives as a more important factor than the absolute tax rate when making site selection decisions.7

Federal Legislative Shifts (OBBBA)

There is ongoing debate in the U.S. Congress regarding the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) or similar legislation that might retroactively restore federal R&E expensing.34 If the federal government were to restore Section 174 expensing, Mississippi taxpayers would essentially find themselves back in conformity with federal rules.2 However, H.B. 1733 ensures that Mississippi does not have to wait for federal action to provide relief to its local industries.1

Potential Expansion of Job Incentives

Legislative trends in Mississippi suggest that the state may look to expand the “qualified employee” definitions in the future. For example, during the 2023 and 2024 sessions, there were discussions about expanding the New Employment Credit to include semiconductor manufacturing and lithium production.35 While H.B. 1733 provides the foundation for capital investment, these targeted labor credits would further solidify Mississippi’s position as a hub for the “green” and “high-tech” manufacturing sectors.

Conclusion

Mississippi House Bill 1733 is a transformative piece of legislation that effectively creates a state-level “safe harbor” for innovation and capital investment. By rejecting the federal government’s move toward R&E amortization and capital depreciation phase-outs, Mississippi has provided its business community with a powerful tool for immediate cost recovery.1

When viewed in conjunction with the R&D Skills Tax Credit and the SMART Act Academic Research Rebate, H.B. 1733 completes a comprehensive policy circle. It addresses the three primary costs of innovation: the cost of personnel, the cost of specialized academic research, and the cost of the underlying capital infrastructure.7 For the business owner, the meaning of H.B. 1733 is clear: the state of Mississippi is an active partner in the financial success of technological endeavors, ensuring that today’s investments are not eroded by tomorrow’s tax burdens.7 As administrative guidance from the Department of Revenue continues to streamline the election process on forms like 83-122 and 84-122, the state stands ready to welcome the next generation of high-growth enterprises.10

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/