Comprehensive Analysis of the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act: Apportionment, Compliance, and Statutory Framework for Multi-State Entities

The phrase “Business Both Within and Without this State” refers to a taxpayer conducting income-generating activities in Nebraska as well as other jurisdictions, necessitating a formulary or expenditure-based apportionment of federal research credits. Under the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act, this classification requires a business to isolate research performed physically within Nebraska borders to determine the specific eligibility for the state’s standard 15% or enhanced 35% tax credits.

The statutory framework of Nebraska’s research incentives is designed to reward innovation that occurs specifically within its geographic boundaries, while providing a clear mechanism for multi-state corporations to participate.1 For entities operating in multiple jurisdictions, the “within and without” designation serves as the primary filter through which global research expenditures are refined into state-specific tax benefits. This process is governed by a combination of the Nebraska Revised Statutes, Department of Revenue rulings, and federal guidelines from the Internal Revenue Code, particularly Sections 41 and 174.3 By requiring apportionment, Nebraska ensures that its fiscal resources are directed toward stimulating local investment, property growth, and employment, rather than subsidizing research and development activities that take place in other states or countries.3

Statutory Interpretation and the Framework of Research Incentives

The Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act, codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 77-5801 to 77-5808, establishes a refundable tax credit for business firms that incur research and experimental expenditures in Nebraska.2 The act leverages federal definitions of research to maintain consistency with national standards while imposing localized restrictions on where that research must be conducted to qualify for state-level benefits.1 For a business to be considered as operating “both within and without” the state, it must have nexus in Nebraska and at least one other jurisdiction, triggering the need for a formal division of its federal research credit.2

The core of this incentive program is its bifurcation into two distinct credit tiers. The standard credit allows a business firm to claim 15% of the federal research credit allowed that is attributable to Nebraska-based activities.1 The second tier, known as the enhanced credit, increases this rate to 35% for research conducted on the campus of a Nebraska college or university or at a facility owned by such an institution in the state.2 This enhanced rate is a strategic legislative effort to foster collaboration between the private sector and Nebraska’s higher education system, thereby creating a pipeline for high-tech innovation and skilled employment within the state.3

Defining Qualified Research and Experimental Expenditures

To understand the “within and without” calculation, one must first analyze the definition of research expenditures under Nebraska law. The state explicitly adopts the definitions found in Section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).2 These expenditures generally include costs incurred in the taxpayer’s trade or business for activities intended to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product.4 Uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability or method for developing or improving the product, or the appropriate design of the product.7

Furthermore, the activities must satisfy the four-part test established under IRC § 41, which includes the section 174 test, the technological in nature test, the functional test (permitted purpose), and the process of experimentation test.4 The technological in nature test requires that the research fundamentally relies on principles of physical or biological science, engineering, or computer science.4 The functional test requires the research to relate to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality.4 Finally, the process of experimentation test requires that substantially all of the activities constitute a systematic process designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve a result where the capability or method is uncertain at the outset.7

The Geographic Limitation of In Nebraska

The most critical phrase for multi-state entities is “in this state.” Revenue Ruling 29-10-2 provides essential guidance on this terminology, determining that “in this state” refers specifically to the physical location of the research or experimental activities.3 For the enhanced credit, the ruling clarifies that the phrase refers to the campus or facility, not the college or university as an entity.3 This means that a multi-state business firm qualifies for the 35% rate only if the actual research work is performed at a Nebraska-based university site.3 If a Nebraska-based university maintains a research facility in another state, activities at that out-of-state facility would not qualify for the Nebraska R&D credit, as the physical site is not “in this state”.3

This geographic focus reinforces the state’s goal of stimulating investment and employment specifically within Nebraska’s borders.3 For businesses operating “both within and without,” this creates a strict boundary: only the portion of the federal credit generated by Nebraska-based QREs (Qualified Research Expenses) is eligible for the state credit.1 If a firm has a large global R&D budget but only a small lab in Lincoln, Nebraska, the “within and without” rules ensure that the state credit is only calculated against the Lincoln lab’s contribution to the federal total.1

Apportionment Methodologies for Multi-State Entities

When a business firm operates both within and without Nebraska, the Department of Revenue requires a specific method to apportion the federal credit to the state.2 Nebraska provides two primary paths for this calculation, designated as Method I and Method II on the official Worksheet RD of Form 3800N.10 Taxpayers must choose one method and apply it consistently to both the standard (15%) and enhanced (35%) portions of the credit for that tax year.2

Method I: Apportionment Using Actual Expenditures

Method I, often referred to as the “Actual Expenditures Method,” is based on the direct ratio of Nebraska-specific expenses to the total expenses used to calculate the federal credit.2 This method is highly precise and is typically used by firms that maintain project-level accounting that can clearly segregate costs by geography.1

Under Method I, the taxpayer calculates the ratio of actual research and experimental expenses incurred in Nebraska to the total research expenses incurred everywhere.2 This ratio is then multiplied by the total federal credit allowed for the tax year.2 The resulting figure represents the “Nebraska portion” of the federal credit, which is then multiplied by either 15% or 35% to determine the final Nebraska credit.2 This method is particularly beneficial for companies that have a higher concentration of R&D spending in Nebraska relative to their overall business operations in the state.4

Method II: Apportionment Using Property and Payroll Factors

Method II utilizes the standard corporate income tax apportionment factors—property and payroll—to derive the Nebraska portion of the federal credit.2 This method aligns the R&D credit with the broader corporate tax structure of the state, which generally uses these factors to determine how much of a multi-state corporation’s income is subject to Nebraska tax.6

The calculation for Method II involves two primary factors:

• Nebraska Property Factor: This is the ratio of the average value of the business firm’s real and tangible personal property owned or rented and used in Nebraska for research, compared to the total value of such property used everywhere for research.10
• Nebraska Payroll Factor: This is the ratio of the total compensation paid in Nebraska to employees performing research, compared to the total compensation paid to research employees everywhere.10

The property and payroll factors are averaged to create a single apportionment percentage.10 This percentage is then applied to the total federal credit to find the Nebraska-apportioned federal amount.2

Strategic Considerations for Method II and Enhanced Credits

A significant nuance identified in Revenue Ruling 29-10-2 involves the application of Method II to on-campus (enhanced) research. In many instances, a business firm may contract with a university to perform research on the university’s campus.3 In such a scenario, the business firm may not own or rent any property on the campus, and the individuals performing the research may be university employees rather than the firm’s employees.2

If the business firm chooses Method II, and has no direct property or payroll on the university campus, the “on-campus” apportionment factor will be 0%, resulting in an enhanced credit of $0.00.2 This remains true even if the firm actually made significant expenditures for university-based research.2 In such cases, the firm must use Method I (Actual Expenditures) to capture the 35% credit, as Method I focuses on the location of the expenditure rather than the ownership of the underlying property or payroll.2

Revenue Office Guidance and Legal Compliance

The Nebraska Department of Revenue (DOR) maintains strict oversight of the R&D credit through several guidance documents, including Revenue Rulings and General Information Letters (GILs).2 These documents provide the interpretative glue that connects the broad language of the statutes to the practical realities of business tax filing.15

Revenue Ruling 29-10-2: Campus and Facility Definitions

This ruling is the cornerstone for interpreting the enhanced credit.3 It addresses whether the phrase “in this state” refers to the university as a legal entity or the physical location of the campus.3 The DOR determined that the location of the research is the critical factor.3 This interpretation prevents businesses from claiming the 35% credit for research performed at out-of-state facilities owned by Nebraska universities, while simultaneously allowing out-of-state businesses to claim the credit if they bring their research to a Nebraska-based campus.3

Furthermore, the ruling establishes an “anti-double-dipping” provision.3 It clarifies that while a single business firm can qualify for both the regular (15%) and enhanced (35%) credits in the same year, the same individual dollar of expenditure cannot qualify for both.3 The activities must be conducted in separate locations—on-campus for the enhanced credit and off-campus for the regular credit—and the calculations must be segregated accordingly on Worksheet RD.3

The E-Verify Mandate: A Critical Compliance Threshold

One of the most rigid requirements for the Nebraska R&D credit is the mandate for employment eligibility verification.2 Under Legislative Bill 403 (2009), all business firms claiming incentives under the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act must utilize the federal E-Verify system to confirm the work eligibility of all employees hired in Nebraska during the tax year the credit is claimed.2

Revenue Ruling 29-13-3 provides detailed guidance on how this mandate applies to multi-state businesses.14 For a business operating “within and without” the state, the E-Verify requirement only applies to “newly hired employees employed in Nebraska”.14 This creates several distinct scenarios for multi-state firms:

• Out-of-State Transfers: If a firm hires an employee in Iowa and later transfers them to a project in Nebraska, the firm is not required to E-Verify that employee for Nebraska purposes, provided they were hired outside the state and remained continuously employed by the firm.14
• Nebraska New Hires: Any employee hired specifically to work in Nebraska must be E-Verified at the time of hire.2 If a firm fails to E-Verify even one such employee during the tax year, the DOR will not grant the R&D credit for that year.2
• Remote Workers: Employees who are hired in and have their duty location in another state are not considered “employed in Nebraska,” and thus fall outside the E-Verify requirement for this specific credit.14

The implications for non-compliance are absolute. The statute specifies that the Tax Commissioner “shall not approve or grant” any tax incentive unless the taxpayer provides satisfactory evidence of E-Verify compliance.2 This makes E-Verify logs a primary document in any audit of Nebraska R&D credits.1

Illustrative Example: Multi-State Apportionment in Practice

To demonstrate the application of these rules, consider the case of “AgriTech Solutions,” a hypothetical multi-state corporation with R&D operations in Nebraska, Iowa, and Colorado.

AgriTech Solutions Data Profile

AgriTech Solutions is a unitary group that has $2,000,000 in total federal Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) for the tax year.1 Its federal research credit, as calculated on IRS Form 6765, is $200,000.1

The company’s expenditures are distributed as follows:

• Nebraska Off-Campus QREs: $800,000 (at its private lab in Kearney).
• Nebraska On-Campus QREs: $200,000 (via a contract with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln).
• Out-of-State QREs: $1,000,000 (at sites in Iowa and Colorado).

1

Step 1: Determining the Apportionment Ratio (Method I)

Using Method I (Actual Expenditures), AgriTech calculates its Nebraska-to-Everywhere ratio:

• Total Nebraska QREs: $800,000 + $200,000 = $1,000,000.
• Total Federal QREs: $2,000,000.
• Nebraska Ratio: $1,000,000 / $2,000,000 = 50%.1

Step 2: Apportioning the Federal Credit

AgriTech then applies this ratio to its total federal credit to isolate the Nebraska portion:

• Nebraska-Apportioned Federal Credit: $200,000 * 50% = $100,000.1

Step 3: Categorizing by Rate Tier

The company must now divide that $100,000 based on the location of the research within Nebraska:

• Off-Campus Ratio: $800,000 / $1,000,000 = 80%.
• On-Campus Ratio: $200,000 / $1,000,000 = 20%.

Calculations:

• Standard Credit Amount: ($100,000 * 80%) * 15% = $12,000.1
• Enhanced Credit Amount: ($100,000 * 20%) * 35% = $7,000.1
• Total Nebraska R&D Credit: $12,000 + $7,000 = $19,000.

Step 4: Compliance Review

Before claiming this $19,000, AgriTech must ensure it E-Verified every new employee hired in Nebraska during the year.2 If AgriTech hired two new lab assistants in Kearney but only E-Verified one, the entire $19,000 credit would be denied upon audit, regardless of the validity of the research expenditures.1

Pass-Through Treatment and Entity-Level Benefits

One of the most attractive features of the Nebraska R&D credit is its refundability at the entity level.1 For C-corporations and most entity-level filers, the credit can be used as a refundable income tax credit or to obtain a direct refund of state sales and use taxes paid.1 This provides immediate liquidity to companies, which is particularly vital for startups and multi-state firms that may have high R&D costs but low Nebraska income tax liability.1

Distribution to Owners

When the credit is earned by a pass-through entity—such as a partnership, S-corporation, or LLC—the credit is distributed to the partners or shareholders pro-rata.1 These credits are reported to the owners on Nebraska Schedule K-1N.19

However, the nature of the credit changes upon distribution. While it is refundable at the entity level, it becomes nonrefundable at the owner level.1 An individual shareholder can only use the distributed credit to offset their own Nebraska income tax liability.1 If the individual’s tax liability is less than the credit received, the excess cannot be refunded but may be carried forward for up to 20 years.1 This distinction is a vital planning point for multi-state owners who may not have significant individual Nebraska-sourced income but are part of a profitable multi-state enterprise.17

Unitary Group Filing and Combined Apportionment

For multi-state corporations that are part of a unitary group, Nebraska requires the credit to be calculated based on the group’s combined activities.12 The “within and without” analysis must account for the research activities of all members of the unitary group that have nexus in Nebraska.17 If one member of the group conducts research in Nebraska while another member manages the payroll and property, the group must ensure that its chosen apportionment method (Method I or Method II) accurately reflects the combined economic footprint to maximize the credit while remaining compliant with unitary filing rules.10

Economic Performance and Statistical Overview

The Nebraska Department of Revenue provides annual reports to the Legislature that offer a window into the scale and effectiveness of the R&D credit program.21 These statistics demonstrate how the “within and without” rules effectively funnel innovation into the state’s key economic sectors.8

Recent Fiscal Year Performance (2024-2025)

The 2025 Annual Report reveals a robust utilization of the R&D credit, primarily through sales tax refunds.21 This indicates that businesses are leveraging the credit for immediate cash flow rather than just income tax offsets.21

Historical Context and Sector Impact

A historical audit (2006-2020) highlights the program’s reach. During this period, 460 companies claimed more than $72 million in credits.8 The high utilization rate of 93.7% suggests that companies are successfully navigating the apportionment and compliance requirements.8

The high-tech and renewable energy sectors have been notable beneficiaries of the program. High-tech firms, which often have mobile “within and without” operations, accounted for 24% of program participants and received $14.8 million in credits.8 The renewable energy sector accounted for 4% of participants, receiving $4.2 million.8 This sectoral data confirms that the Nebraska R&D credit is serving its intended purpose of stimulating growth in specialized, high-value industries.1

Form 3800N and Documentation Requirements

To successfully claim the credit, a multi-state business must file Form 3800N (Nebraska Incentives Credit Computation) and its accompanying Worksheet RD.2 These forms require specific data from the federal return and detailed Nebraska-specific inputs.10

Worksheet RD: The Engine of Apportionment

Worksheet RD is where the “within and without” division actually occurs.10 It requires the taxpayer to:

• Enter the total federal research credit from IRS Form 6765.10
• Select Method I or Method II.10
• Provide the physical address of any Nebraska college or university campus where research was conducted to qualify for the enhanced credit.10
• Attach schedules showing the calculation of the Nebraska property and payroll factors if using Method II.10

Recordkeeping for Audits

Multi-state businesses are subject to rigorous recordkeeping requirements. The general rule is to retain records for at least three years after filing the return.19 However, for R&D credits, which can be carried forward for 20 years, the taxpayer must keep the original records supporting the credit until three years after the last carryforward year is utilized.7

Essential documents for an audit include:

• Federal Form 6765: To prove the baseline credit amount.9
• E-Verify Logs: To prove compliance with the mandatory verification of Nebraska hires.1
• Campus Contracts: To prove the research was performed at a qualified university site for the 35% rate.3
• Project Logs: Detailing the specific activities, technological uncertainties, and processes of experimentation to satisfy IRC § 41 standards.4

Broader Nexus and Sourcing Implications

For multi-state firms, the “within and without” analysis for the R&D credit does not exist in a vacuum. It is part of a broader set of sourcing rules that Nebraska uses to tax modern businesses.6 Recent updates, such as GIL 24-20-1, clarify how the state sources intangible income, which is often closely related to R&D activities.13

For instance, Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) is included in the Nebraska sales factor numerator only if the intangible value giving rise to it is “connected with and fairly attributable to developing or maintaining the intangible property in Nebraska”.13 This mirrors the R&D credit’s requirement that the research must take place “in this state”.3 By aligning these definitions, Nebraska creates a consistent tax environment where the physical presence of innovation (labs, university collaborations, and researchers) is the primary driver of both tax liability and tax incentives.3

Nexus and Pass-Through Complexity

Multi-state partnerships must be particularly cautious. A partnership is required to file a Nebraska return (Form 1065N) even if it does not directly conduct business in the state, provided it owns an interest in a lower-tier partnership that is doing business in Nebraska.6 This “attribution rule” means that R&D credits can flow up through multiple layers of a tiered partnership structure, eventually reaching owners who may have never set foot in Nebraska.6 These owners must still comply with Nebraska filing requirements to claim their share of the nonrefundable R&D credit.17

Conclusion: Strategic Value of the Nebraska R&D Incentive

The Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act offers a sophisticated and highly valuable incentive for multi-state corporations that are willing to anchor their innovation efforts within the state. By defining “Business Both Within and Without this State” through the lens of apportionment, Nebraska allows large-scale enterprises to participate in its local economy without exporting state tax dollars to other jurisdictions.

The standard 15% credit provides a competitive baseline for off-campus research, while the 35% enhanced credit stands as one of the most generous university-based research incentives in the United States. For multi-state firms, the choice between Method I (Actual Expenditures) and Method II (Property and Payroll) is a critical decision that must be made based on the physical realities of their Nebraska footprint. Furthermore, the E-Verify mandate serves as a non-negotiable compliance threshold that requires proactive human resources management to protect the financial integrity of the credit.

As demonstrated by the nearly $100 million in credits approved since 2006, the program continues to be a central pillar of Nebraska’s economic development strategy. For the professional peer—the tax director, the R&D manager, or the corporate counsel—the Nebraska R&D credit is not merely a line item on a tax return; it is a strategic tool for enhancing project ROI, fostering academic collaboration, and fueling long-term growth in an increasingly competitive global innovation landscape. Success in claiming these credits requires a deep commitment to geographic precision, technical compliance, and a nuanced understanding of Nebraska’s unique statutory requirements.

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/