Comprehensive Analysis of Contract Research Expenses under the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act

Contract research expenses represent sixty-five percent of the payments made by a taxpayer to non-employee third parties for qualified research services conducted on behalf of a taxpayer within Nebraska. These expenses are utilized to determine the Nebraska Research and Development tax credit, which provides a refundable incentive equal to fifteen percent of the apportioned federal research credit, increasing to thirty-five percent for university-based collaborations. 1

The Strategic Role of Contract Research in Nebraska’s Innovation Economy

The Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act serves as a vital fiscal mechanism designed to foster a culture of technological advancement and industrial modernization within the state. By aligning state incentives with federal guidelines, Nebraska provides a predictable and robust framework for businesses to recover significant portions of their research and experimental expenditures. The inclusion of contract research expenses within this framework acknowledges the contemporary reality of the “innovation ecosystem,” where firms often lack the internal infrastructure to perform all facets of research and must rely on specialized third-party experts, laboratories, and engineering firms to achieve their technical objectives. 1

Since its inception in 2006, the Act has been a cornerstone of the state’s economic development strategy, particularly for industries such as agriculture, manufacturing, and biotechnology. 1 The legislation recognizes that the costs associated with uncertainty—the hallmark of research and development—can be a deterrent to growth. By offering a refundable credit, Nebraska effectively lowers the barrier to entry for high-risk, high-reward projects. This refundability is a distinctive feature of the Nebraska program; unlike many other states where credits only offset tax liability, Nebraska’s program can provide immediate liquidity through cash refunds or offsets against sales and use taxes, making it an essential tool for startups and loss-making entities. 1

The transition from the older Nebraska Advantage Act to the newer ImagiNE Nebraska Act signifies a shift in the state’s broader incentive philosophy, yet the R&D tax credit remains a durable and specialized component of the state’s tax code. 8 The program’s longevity, currently extending to tax years beginning on or before December 31, 2033, provides businesses with the long-term certainty required to commit to multi-year research initiatives. 1 For businesses navigating this landscape, understanding the nuances of contract research expenses—how they are defined, documented, and apportioned—is paramount to maximizing the value of the incentive.

Legal Definitions and the Federal Nexus

The Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act is fundamentally tethered to the definitions and guidelines set forth by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). To understand what constitutes a “Contract Research Expense” in Nebraska, one must first master the federal definitions under IRC § 41 and § 174, as Nebraska law adopts these standards by reference. 1

The Intersection of IRC Section 174 and Section 41

The qualification of an expense begins with IRC § 174, which defines “research and experimental expenditures” as those incurred in connection with a taxpayer’s trade or business which represent research and development costs in the experimental or laboratory sense. 4 These are costs intended to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a business component. Uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability or method for developing or improving the product or the appropriate design of the product. 11

While § 174 provides the broad definition of what constitutes research, IRC § 41 provides the specific framework for the tax credit, defining the “Qualified Research Expenses” (QREs) that can be used to calculate the credit amount. 1 Within the hierarchy of QREs, contract research expenses occupy a unique position. Unlike in-house wages and supplies, which are generally included at one hundred percent of their qualified value, contract research expenses are typically subject to a “haircut,” being limited to sixty-five percent of the total amount paid to the contractor. 2

Defining the Contract Research Expense (CRE)

According to IRC § 41(b)(3), a contract research expense is sixty-five percent of any amount paid or incurred by the taxpayer to any person (other than an employee) for qualified research. 2 The Treasury Regulations further clarify that the research must be performed “on behalf of” the taxpayer. 14 This implies a specific contractual relationship where three primary criteria must be met to satisfy both federal and Nebraska revenue authorities:

1. Prior Agreement: The contract must be entered into before the research activity commences. 14
2. Economic Risk: The taxpayer must bear the financial risk of the research. If the contract is a “pay-for-success” arrangement where the taxpayer only pays if the contractor achieves a specific result, the contractor—not the taxpayer—may be the party holding the economic risk, thereby disqualifying the expense for the taxpayer. 14
3. Substantial Rights: The taxpayer must retain “substantial rights” to the research results. While the contractor may also retain some rights, the taxpayer must have the right to use the results in their own business without paying a royalty to the contractor. 12

Inclusion Rates and Variations

The sixty-five percent inclusion rate is the standard for most commercial contracts. However, the law provides for variations based on the nature of the entity performing the research. For Nebraska businesses, identifying the correct classification of a contractor is essential for accurate credit modeling.

A “qualified research consortium” is a tax-exempt organization (under § 501(c)(3) or § 501(c)(6)) that is operated primarily to conduct scientific research and is not a private foundation. 1 Nebraska businesses partnering with such entities, such as certain non-profit agricultural research groups, can claim a higher percentage of their expenditures. 1

Nebraska Department of Revenue Guidance and Compliance

While Nebraska follows federal definitions for what constitutes a qualified expense, the Nebraska Department of Revenue (NDOR) imposes specific local requirements that function as gatekeepers for the credit. Failure to comply with these state-specific mandates, even if the research qualifies under federal law, will result in the total denial of the Nebraska R&D credit. 1

The E-Verify Mandate: A Critical Threshold

The most significant local compliance hurdle is the mandatory use of the federal E-Verify system. Pursuant to Legislative Bill 403 (2009) and subsequent revenue rulings, any business claiming Nebraska tax incentives must verify the work eligibility of all “newly hired employees” in Nebraska. 4

Revenue Ruling 29-13-3 provides detailed guidance on this requirement. The NDOR stipulates that for the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act, the taxpayer must have electronically verified the work eligibility status of all employees hired in Nebraska during the tax year for which the credit is claimed. 4 This is a “strict liability” requirement; if a taxpayer hires ten employees in a year and fails to verify even one of them through E-Verify within the required timeframe (generally within three business days of hire), the taxpayer is disqualified from claiming the R&D credit for that entire tax year. 17

For the purposes of contract research, it is important to distinguish between the taxpayer’s employees and the contractor’s employees. The E-Verify mandate applies to the taxpayer’s internal hires in Nebraska. 4 While the taxpayer is not typically required to E-Verify the contractor’s staff, the taxpayer’s own institutional compliance with E-Verify is the condition precedent that allows them to claim the credit on all QREs, including contract research. 4

Nebraska-Sourced Activity Requirements

The Nebraska R&D credit is intended to reward innovation occurring within the state. Therefore, the “Nebraska-sourced” requirement is central to NDOR guidance. 1 For in-house expenses, this is straightforward: the employees must be working in Nebraska. For contract research expenses, the analysis is more complex. The research activity performed by the contractor must physically occur within the state of Nebraska to be eligible for the state credit. 1

In a multi-state environment, a Nebraska-based firm might hire a national laboratory with facilities in both Nebraska and Colorado. Only the portion of the contract payments attributable to the work performed at the Nebraska facility can be included in the Nebraska QRE calculation. 1 NDOR guidance requires taxpayers to maintain records—such as contractor invoices that break down work by location or project manifests—that clearly establish the Nebraska nexus of the research. 1

The 20-Year Claim Window and Refundability

Nebraska offers an unusually long window for claiming the R&D credit. Once a business begins claiming the credit, it may continue to do so for the following twenty tax years, provided it continues to earn the federal credit and conducts research in the state. 1 This extended period is designed to support the long-term lifecycle of product development, particularly in highly regulated fields like pharmaceuticals or advanced machinery. 1

The credit is fully refundable at the entity level. Businesses can elect to receive the credit as:

1. A refundable income tax credit (providing a cash payment if the credit exceeds tax liability). 1
2. A refund of Nebraska sales and use taxes paid by the business. 1

For pass-through entities (S-corporations, partnerships, LLCs), the credits flow through to the owners on a pro-rata basis via Schedule K-1. 1 However, NDOR guidance specifies that once the credit is distributed to the owner level, it becomes non-refundable and can only be used to offset the individual owner’s Nebraska income tax liability. 1

University Collaboration and the Enhanced Credit Rate

One of the most potent features of the Nebraska R&D tax credit is the “Enhanced” rate for university-based research. The state incentivizes academic-industry partnerships by more than doubling the standard credit rate for qualifying activities. 1

The 35% Enhanced Rate Mechanics

While standard off-campus research earns a credit equal to fifteen percent of the federal credit, expenditures made for research and experimental activities performed “on the campus of a college or university in Nebraska” qualify for a thirty-five percent credit. 1 This enhanced rate applies not only to work performed at central campuses but also at any facility in Nebraska owned by a Nebraska college or university. 1

For contract research, this often involves a Sponsored Research Agreement (SRA) where a private firm pays a university lab to conduct specific experiments. These payments are treated as contract research expenses. 1 If the work is performed at a facility like the University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Innovation Campus, the taxpayer can apply the 35% rate to the apportioned federal credit. 1

Limitations and Duration of Enhanced Credits

The enhanced credit is subject to a shorter duration than the standard credit. While the 15% credit is available for twenty years, the 35% enhanced credit is allowed for the first tax year it is claimed and only the following four tax years, provided the business continues to earn the federal credit and continues its on-campus research expenditures. 1

Taxpayers must explicitly document the location of the on-campus activity on Nebraska Form 3800N Worksheet RD. 22 The address of the university facility must be provided, and if multiple facilities are used, a detailed schedule must be attached to the return. 22

Basic Research Payments vs. Contract Research

At the federal level, payments to universities can sometimes be classified as “Basic Research Payments” under IRC § 41(e), which are subject to a different calculation method than standard QREs. 2 Basic research is defined as original investigation for the advancement of scientific knowledge not having a specific commercial objective. 23

Under Nebraska law, if these payments meet the definition of basic research and are part of the federal credit calculation, they are included in the pool of expenses used to determine the state’s 35% enhanced credit. 1 The distinction is important for larger corporations that may have a “base period” for university giving; the credit is generally calculated on the increase in such payments over a base amount. 13

Calculating the Credit: The Interplay of Federal and State Forms

The calculation of the Nebraska R&D credit is an exercise in apportionment. The taxpayer does not calculate a state credit directly from state expenses; rather, they calculate a federal credit and then determine what “slice” of that federal credit belongs to Nebraska. 1

The Apportionment Ratio

The central calculation involves determining the ratio of Nebraska activity to total activity. The NDOR provides two methods for this on Worksheet RD of Form 3800N. 22

Method I: Property and Payroll Factor Apportionment

This method uses the business’s overall footprint in Nebraska compared to its total footprint. It is calculated by averaging the Nebraska property factor and the Nebraska payroll factor. 22

$$Factor_{NE} = \frac{ \left( \frac{Property_{NE}}{Property_{Total}} \right) + \left( \frac{Payroll_{NE}}{Payroll_{Total}} \right) }{2}$$

The resulting factor is then multiplied by the total federal credit (from IRS Form 6765) and then by the state rate (15% or 35%). 22

Method II: Actual Expenditure Apportionment

This method is more precise and is preferred for companies whose research is concentrated in Nebraska. It uses the actual dollar amount of qualified R&D expenses. 22

$$Ratio_{NE} = \frac{Qualified Expenses_{NE}}{Qualified Expenses_{Total}}$$

In this scenario, “Qualified Expenses” include the 65% of contract research payments. If a company spends $\$1,000,000$ globally on R&D, and $\$200,000$ of that is qualified Nebraska work (including $\$100,000$ in payments to a Nebraska contractor, of which $\$65,000$ is qualified), the ratio would be $20\%$. 22

The Role of Form 6765

IRS Form 6765 is the starting point for all Nebraska claims. Taxpayers must provide a copy of this form with their Nebraska return. 1 The federal form identifies the total QREs (wages, supplies, and 65% of contract research) and calculates the credit using either the Regular Research Credit (RRC) or the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC). 2 Nebraska accepts the credit amount generated by either federal method as the base for the state credit. 1

Documentation and Audit Preparedness for Contract Research

The subjective nature of “qualified research” makes the R&D tax credit a frequent target for audit by both the IRS and the NDOR. For contract research expenses, the burden of proof is particularly high because the work is performed by an outside party. 12

Substantiating the “Four-Part Test”

To qualify, a project—including work performed by a contractor—must pass the four-part test established in IRC § 41(d). 3 Taxpayers must ensure their contractors provide enough information to substantiate each prong:

1. Permitted Purpose: The research must be for the purpose of creating a new or improved business component’s function, performance, reliability, or quality. 11
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: The research must intend to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the capability, method, or design of the business component. 11
3. Process of Experimentation: Substantially all of the activities must constitute a process of experimentation involving the identification of uncertainty, the evaluation of alternatives (modeling, simulation, trial and error), and the refinement of a hypothesis. 3
4. Technological in Nature: The process of experimentation must fundamentally rely on principles of physical science, biological science, engineering, or computer science. 3

Essential Documentation for Contractors

NDOR guidance and general audit techniques recommend maintaining a comprehensive project file for each contractor. 13

Common Audit Pitfalls in Contract Research

The NDOR often identifies several recurring errors during qualification audits. 5 One of the most common is the inclusion of “post-production” or “routine” activities performed by contractors. If a contractor is hired for quality control testing of an existing product or for routine data collection, those expenses do not qualify as R&D. 2

Another common issue is the “Funding” analysis. If a contractor is performing research for a Nebraska taxpayer, but the contract is structured as a “fixed-price” bid where the contractor retains the rights to the IP and takes the risk of loss, the contractor may be the only party eligible for the credit. 14 The taxpayer must prove that the research was not funded by the contractor’s own internal resources or by another third party. 15

Statistical Overview and Economic Impact of the R&D Act

The effectiveness of the Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act is evaluated through biennial performance audits and annual reports by the Tax Commissioner. 5 These reports provide deep insights into how the credit is utilized across different industries and geographic regions within the state.

Program Participation and Credit Award Data (2006-2020)

A comprehensive audit of the program covering the years 2006 through 2020 revealed substantial participation and investment. 5

The data indicates that companies participating in the R&D program typically use over 90% of the credits they are awarded, highlighting the credit’s importance for immediate financial planning. 5 In 2020 alone, program credit usage exceeded $\$10$ million, significantly higher than the initial legislative projection of $\$5$ million per year. 5

Company Retention and Longevity

One of the key metrics for the NDOR is the “sustained presence” of companies receiving incentives. Of the 341 companies that could be tracked since 2016, eighty-nine percent were considered “sustained,” meaning they maintained activity in Nebraska for five or more years after first earning the credit. 5 This suggests that the R&D credit is successful in anchoring innovative firms to the state’s economy. 5

R&D Intensity and Regional Comparisons

Despite the growth in absolute R&D spending in Nebraska—which reached $\$888$ million in 2019—the state’s R&D intensity (R&D spending as a percentage of GDP) remains lower than the national average. 5

The effective credit rate in Nebraska, when calculated as a percentage of total qualified spending rather than a percentage of the federal credit, is approximately 3% for standard research and 7% for university research. 5 This ties Nebraska with Colorado for the lowest effective rate in the region, though Nebraska’s full refundability often makes it more attractive to early-stage companies than Iowa or Kansas’s non-refundable offerings. 5

Federal Legislative Shifts and Their Impact on Nebraska Credits

Because the Nebraska R&D credit is a derivative of the federal credit, changes in federal tax law have profound ripple effects on state-level filings. 1 Two recent major shifts have complicated the landscape for contract research expenses: the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) of 2025.

Mandatory Capitalization under Section 174

Starting in tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, the TCJA mandated that businesses could no longer immediately deduct R&D expenses (including contract research payments). Instead, they were required to capitalize and amortize these costs over five years for domestic research and fifteen years for foreign research. 12

This change created a “phantom income” problem for many Nebraska firms. While they were still earning the R&D tax credit, their taxable income increased because they could not deduct the full cost of their contractors in the year they paid them. 13 This decoupling of the credit from the immediate deduction increased the importance of the Nebraska credit’s refundability, as it became one of the few ways companies could recoup cash flow during the amortization period. 1

The OBBBA Restoration of Full Expensing

In July 2025, the OBBBA was signed into law, permanently restoring the ability for businesses to immediately deduct domestic R&D expenditures under a new Section 174A. 25 Crucially for Nebraska small businesses (those with average annual gross receipts not exceeding $\$31$ million), the law allows for a retroactive election to apply this full expensing to the 2022-2024 tax years. 25

This restoration simplifies the interaction with the Nebraska credit. Taxpayers who elect to immediately deduct their contract research expenses at the federal level will find their state-level calculations easier to align with their federal tax returns. 1 Furthermore, the OBBBA introduces new reporting requirements on Federal Form 6765 Section G, which will become mandatory in 2026. 25 This section requires project-level reporting of employee wages and contract research, creating a natural documentation trail that Nebraska auditors will likely use to verify state claims. 25

Comprehensive Example: The Integrated Research Venture

To demonstrate the intersection of contract research, university partnership, and Nebraska’s apportionment rules, consider the following scenario for a hypothetical Omaha-based software company, “Nebraska-Sync.”

Scenario Variables

In the 2024 tax year, Nebraska-Sync invests heavily in a new machine-learning platform for agricultural predictive modeling. Their expenses include:

• In-house Software Developers (Omaha): $\$500,000$
• Outside Testing Contractor (Lincoln, NE): $\$200,000$
• Cloud Computing/Server Rental (Directly for R&D): $\$50,000$
• Advanced Algorithm Development (University of Nebraska-Omaha): $\$100,000$
• UI/UX Contractor (Chicago, IL): $\$100,000$

Step 1: Identify Qualified Nebraska Research Expenses (QREs)

The company must filter these expenses based on location and the 65% inclusion rule. 1

1. Omaha Developers: Full inclusion as they are in-house and in Nebraska. = $\$500,000$
2. Lincoln Testing Contractor: Qualifies as contract research, performed in Nebraska. = $\$200,000 \times 65\% = \$130,000$
3. Cloud Computing: Qualified as a computer lease expense under federal § 41(b)(2)(A)(iii). = $\$50,000$
4. University (UNO): Qualifies for the enhanced credit rate as on-campus Nebraska research. = $\$100,000 \times 65\% = \$65,000$
5. Chicago Contractor: EXCLUDED from Nebraska QREs because the work was not performed in Nebraska. (However, it remains in the total federal QRE pool).

Nebraska QREs (Standard): $\$680,000$ (Wages + Lincoln Contractor + Cloud)

Nebraska QREs (Enhanced): $\$65,000$ (UNO)

Total Global QREs: $\$500,000 + (\$200,000 \times 0.65) + \$50,000 + (\$100,000 \times 0.65) + (\$100,000 \times 0.65) = \$810,000$

Step 2: Calculate the Federal Credit (ASC Method)

For simplicity, assume the company’s average QREs for the prior three years were $\$500,000$. Under the ASC method, the credit is 14% of the amount by which current QREs exceed 50% of the average. 6

• Base Amount = $\$500,000 \times 50\% = \$250,000$
• Qualified Excess = $\$810,000 – \$250,000 = \$560,000$
• Federal Credit = $\$560,000 \times 14\% = \$78,400$

Step 3: Nebraska Apportionment (Method II)

Using the expenditure-based method from Worksheet RD. 22

• Ratio Standard: $\$680,000 / \$810,000 = 83.95\%$
• Ratio Enhanced: $\$65,000 / \$810,000 = 8.02\%$

Federal Credit Allocated to Nebraska (Standard): $\$78,400 \times 83.95\% = \$65,816.80$

Federal Credit Allocated to Nebraska (Enhanced): $\$78,400 \times 8.02\% = \$6,287.68$

Step 4: Final Nebraska Credit Calculation

Apply the 15% and 35% state rates. 1

• Nebraska Standard Credit: $\$65,816.80 \times 15\% = \$9,872.52$
• Nebraska Enhanced Credit: $\$6,287.68 \times 35\% = \$2,200.69$

Total Refundable Credit: $\$12,073.21$

In this scenario, the company would receive over $\$12,000$ back from the state, which could be used to hire an additional junior engineer or reinvest in more contract research for the following year. 1

Understanding the Relationship with ImagiNE Nebraska

As of 2021, Nebraska shifted its primary incentive focus to the ImagiNE Nebraska Act. 8 While the R&D Act remains a powerful standalone tool, it is essential to understand how it differs from the R&D components within ImagiNE Nebraska agreements. 8

Strategic Differences in R&D Incentives

Under the original Nebraska Advantage Act, R&D was often part of a multi-tier package involving investment and job creation. 10 The R&D-specific Act (which we are discussing) is a separate path that does not require the massive capital investment or job-creation thresholds of the broader incentive acts. 4

For many technology companies, the “Advantage R&D Act” remains the preferred route because it lacks the rigid job-creation hurdles of ImagiNE, allowing the company to focus purely on the technical merits of their research. 4

Reporting and Audit Trends for 2025

The 2025 Annual Incentives Report highlights that while the Nebraska Advantage Act stopped accepting new applications in 2020, seventy-nine active projects under that older program still account for nearly $\$5$ billion in capital investment. 10 The Department of Revenue continues to audit these projects, with a focus on E-Verify compliance and the proper recapture of benefits if targets are not met. 10 Taxpayers claiming the R&D credit should expect similar scrutiny, particularly regarding the “Qualified Services” performed by their contractors. 1

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Nebraska Advantage Research and Development Act provides one of the most stable and accessible innovation incentives in the United States. Its reliance on federal definitions creates a streamlined process for compliance, yet its state-specific nuances—particularly regarding E-Verify and university partnerships—require careful strategic management.

For businesses seeking to maximize their return on contract research, several proactive steps are recommended. First, companies should institutionalize the E-Verify process as a mandatory component of their Nebraska onboarding to ensure that no single hire inadvertently disqualifies the entire R&D credit. Second, when drafting contracts with third-party researchers or labs, businesses should ensure the agreement explicitly transfers all substantial rights to the taxpayer and places the economic risk of failure squarely on the payer. Third, given the thirty-five percent enhanced rate, businesses should actively look for opportunities to pivot research projects to Nebraska university campuses or university-owned facilities. Finally, as federal reporting under OBBBA becomes more granular with the implementation of Section G on Form 6765, businesses should align their internal tracking to these project-based standards now.

By treating the Nebraska R&D tax credit not just as a compliance task but as a strategic capital-recovery tool, businesses can significantly offset the high costs of discovery and maintain their competitive edge in an increasingly complex technological landscape. 1

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/