Comprehensive Analysis of Internal Revenue Code Section 41 and the New Hampshire Manufacturing Research and Development Tax Credit

Internal Revenue Code Section 41 provides a federal tax credit to businesses for increasing their investment in qualified research and development activities within the United States. In New Hampshire, this federal framework is specifically adapted under RSA 77-A:5 to incentivize the state’s manufacturing sector by offering a nonrefundable credit against business taxes for qualifying research wages performed locally. 1

The intersection of federal tax law and state-level incentives creates a complex regulatory environment where definitions are often shared but application remains distinct. Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41, originally enacted as a temporary measure in 1981 and made permanent by the PATH Act of 2015, serves as the technical foundation for identifying what constitutes “qualified research.” For a business to claim the credit, its activities must survive the rigorous “Four-Part Test,” which ensures the research is technological in nature, intended for a permitted purpose, designed to eliminate technical uncertainty, and involves a process of experimentation. While the federal credit encompasses a wide array of expenses—including wages, supplies, and contract research—the New Hampshire Research and Development (R&D) Tax Credit is far more targeted. State law specifically limits the incentive to manufacturing-related research and restricts eligible expenditures exclusively to wages. This alignment necessitates a deep understanding of both the federal statutory requirements and the specific administrative guidance issued by the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (DRA) to ensure compliance and maximize tax savings. 1

The Federal Foundation: Deconstructing IRC Section 41

The federal R&D tax credit is a cornerstone of American industrial policy, designed to reward companies that take the financial risk of innovation. IRC Section 41(a) establishes the general rule that the research credit is equal to the sum of 20 percent of the excess of the qualified research expenses (QREs) for the taxable year over the base amount. 7

The Definition of Qualified Research Expenses

Under the federal statute, expenses are categorized into two primary types: in-house research expenses and contract research expenses. This distinction is critical because New Hampshire law adopts only a subset of these federal definitions. 1

In-house research expenses, as defined in Section 41(b)(2), include:

• Wages: Any wages paid or incurred to an employee for “qualified services” performed by such employee. This includes not only those directly performing the research but also those in direct supervision or direct support of such activities. 1
• Supplies: Any tangible property, other than land or improvements to land and property subject to depreciation, used in the conduct of qualified research. 1
• Computer Costs: Amounts paid or incurred to another person for the right to use computers in the conduct of qualified research, often interpreted in modern contexts as cloud computing or server rental costs. 1

Contract research expenses, defined in Section 41(b)(3), generally allow for 65 percent of the amount paid to a third party to be included in the credit calculation, provided the research is conducted on behalf of the taxpayer. 1

The Four-Part Test: The Qualitative Gateway

To be considered “qualified research” under Section 41(d), an activity must satisfy four cumulative requirements. If a project fails any single test, all associated costs are disqualified from the credit calculation. 2

The first prong, the Section 174 test, requires that expenditures be incurred in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business and represent research and development costs in the experimental sense. Uncertainty is deemed to exist if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability or method for developing or improving the product, or the appropriate design of the product. 5 The second prong mandates that the research be technological in nature, explicitly excluding research in the social sciences, arts, or humanities. 1 The third prong, the permitted purpose test, requires the activity to relate to a new or improved function, performance, reliability, or quality for a business component. Finally, the process of experimentation test requires that substantially all of the activities constitute a process designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve a result where the capability, method, or design is uncertain at the outset. 2

Federal Exclusions and Limitations

Section 41(d)(4) provides a specific list of activities for which the credit is not allowed. These exclusions are strictly enforced by the IRS and are subsequently inherited by New Hampshire’s state credit program. 1

• Research after Commercial Production: Once a business component is ready for commercial sale or use, any further research related to it is disqualified. 1
• Adaptation of Existing Business Components: Research related to adapting an existing component to a particular customer’s requirement or need does not qualify. 1
• Duplication of Existing Business Components: Activities related to the reproduction of an existing business component through physical examination, reverse engineering, or publicly available specifications are excluded. 1
• Foreign Research: Any research conducted outside the United States, Puerto Rico, or U.S. possessions is ineligible for the credit. 1
• Funded Research: Research to the extent it is funded by any grant, contract, or otherwise by another person or governmental entity is disallowed. 1

New Hampshire State Context: RSA 77-A:5, XIII

New Hampshire’s Research and Development Tax Credit was established during the 2007 legislative session under Chapter 271 of the Laws of New Hampshire. It is codified in RSA 77-A:5, XIII (for the Business Profits Tax) and RSA 77-E:3-b (for the Business Enterprise Tax). 4

The Manufacturing Specificity

The defining characteristic of the New Hampshire R&D credit is its focus on “qualified manufacturing research and development.” While the federal credit is industry-agnostic, New Hampshire law requires that the research be specifically tied to a “new or improved manufacturing process or business component.” 3

The New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (DRA) defines qualified manufacturing R&D expenditures as wages paid to employees of the business organization for services rendered within the state. These services must qualify under IRC Section 41 and be reported on Federal Form 6765. 6

The Wage-Only Restriction in New Hampshire

A significant point of divergence from federal law is the exclusion of all non-wage expenses. For the purpose of the New Hampshire credit, the following federal QREs are ineligible: 3

• Supplies and raw materials.
• Contract research expenditures (payments to third parties).
• Cloud computing or computer rental costs.
• Prototype materials and equipment.

The state focuses entirely on the “compensation element.” Specifically, the DRA instructs taxpayers that qualified expenditures are the wage amounts attributable to New Hampshire that make up lines 5 or 24 of the business organization’s Federal Form 6765. 6

Comparative Analysis of Federal vs. New Hampshire Eligibility

The following table highlights the restrictive nature of the New Hampshire credit compared to the broader federal IRC Section 41 framework.

Administrative Guidance and Local Revenue Office Procedures

The New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (DRA) provides specific guidance through Technical Information Releases (TIRs), administrative rules (Rev 2400), and form instructions. 11

TIR 2007-007: The Foundation of the Credit

The DRA issued TIR 2007-007 on November 13, 2007, to provide immediate interpretation of the newly enacted law. This release clarified that the credit is first applied against the Business Profits Tax (BPT), with any remainder applied to the Business Enterprise Tax (BET). It also established the initial funding pool of $1,000,000 per year and the $50,000 per-taxpayer cap. 11

Administrative Rule Rev 2406.05

Administrative rules further refine the application process. N.H. Admin. Code § Rev 2406.05 mandates that: 16

1. A business enterprise must file Form DP-165 (“Research & Development Tax Credit Application”) with the commissioner by June 30 following the taxable period.
2. Unused credits not applied to BPT may offset BET liability.
3. Wages used for the credit must be included in the “compensation element” of the enterprise value tax base for BET purposes.
4. If a taxpayer makes quarterly estimated payments resulting in overpayments after the credit is applied, they may request a refund for that overpayment on their Form BT-Summary. 16

The Application Process: Form DP-165

The application process in New Hampshire is proactive rather than reactive. Unlike the federal credit, which is claimed directly on a tax return, the New Hampshire credit requires an application before the credit can be used on a return. 3

Critical Deadlines and Requirements:

• Deadline: June 30. This is a hard deadline. Late filings are ineligible for the credit. 3
• Mandatory Attachment: A copy of Federal Form 6765 must be attached. If the federal return is not yet due or is on extension, a “pro-forma” or draft copy of Form 6765 must be submitted with the application. 6
• Qualified Wages: The taxpayer must specifically identify the portion of wages from lines 5 or 24 of Form 6765 that were paid for services rendered within New Hampshire. 6
• Submission: Applications can be mailed or submitted electronically via the Granite Tax Connect (GTC) portal. 3

The Mechanics of Proration and the $7 Million Cap

One of the most complex aspects of the New Hampshire R&D credit is the statewide aggregate cap and the resulting proration process. 3

Escalation of the Statewide Cap

The New Hampshire legislature has progressively increased the total funding available for this credit as its popularity grew among the business community. 6

The Proration Calculation

Because the individual cap is $50,000 and the statewide cap is $7,000,000, the program can support at least 140 maximum awards. However, hundreds of businesses typically apply, often requesting total credits that exceed the $7 million threshold. 3

When the aggregate requests exceed the cap, the DRA must reduce each award proportionately. The calculation follows this logic:

1. Determine the total amount of credits requested by all qualified applicants (each capped at $50,000).
2. If the total exceeds $7,000,000, calculate a proration factor: $Proration Factor = \frac{7,000,000}{Total Requested}$.
3. Apply this factor to each individual’s requested credit. 3

Notification Timeline:

• July 31: DRA sends acknowledgment of receipt. 6
• September 30: DRA notifies applicants of their final awarded credit amount after proration. 3

Calculation Example: The Electronics Manufacturer

To understand the practical application of these laws, consider a hypothetical Concord-based electronics company that designs and manufactures advanced circuit boards. 3

Step 1: Identify Qualified Federal Wages

The company identifies four engineers and two technicians working on a new manufacturing process for high-heat sensors. Their total wages for these activities (qualified under IRC Section 41) are $600,000. These are reported on Line 5 of the company’s Federal Form 6765. 1

Step 2: Determine the Base Amount

New Hampshire allows the base amount to be determined using the federal methodology (fixed-base percentage multiplied by the average gross receipts of the prior four years). However, New Hampshire allows this base amount to be as low as zero, overriding the federal minimum of 50 percent of current year expenses. 3

• Current NH Qualified Wages: $600,000.
• Calculated Base Amount: $400,000.
• Excess Qualified Wages: $200,000. 3

Step 3: Calculate the Requested Credit

The credit is 10 percent of the excess qualified wages.

• $10\% \times \$200,000 = \$20,000$.
• Since $20,000 is less than the $50,000 per-taxpayer cap, the company requests $20,000 on Form DP-165. 3

Step 4: Final Award after State Proration

Assume that for this fiscal year, the DRA receives valid requests totaling $10,000,000.

• Proration Factor: $7,000,000 / 10,000,000 = 0.70$.
• Final Award: $\$20,000 \times 0.70 = \$14,000$.
  The company receives an award letter for $14,000 on September 30. 3

Integration with Business Profits Tax (BPT) and Business Enterprise Tax (BET)

The New Hampshire R&D credit must be applied to the state’s business taxes in a specific hierarchical order. This is particularly relevant for businesses that pay both BPT and BET. 3

The Order of Offset

According to RSA 77-A:5 and DRA instructions (Form DP-160), the credit is applied as follows: 3

1. Business Profits Tax (BPT): The credit first reduces the BPT liability.
2. Business Enterprise Tax (BET): Any unused portion of the credit may then be used to offset the BET liability.

Carryforward Rules

If the total awarded credit exceeds the combined BPT and BET liability for the year, the unused portion may be carried forward for up to five subsequent taxable periods. 3 It is important to note that New Hampshire does not allow a “carryback” of this credit to prior tax years.

The “Compensation Element” and BET

An often-overlooked requirement is found in Rev 2406.05(c). Because the R&D credit is based on wages, and wages are part of the “compensation element” of the Business Enterprise Tax base, the DRA requires that any wages included in the R&D credit calculation must also be included in the BET tax base. This prevents taxpayers from excluding research wages from the BET base while simultaneously claiming a credit on those same wages. 16

Entity-Level Application for Flow-Through Entities

A distinct feature of New Hampshire tax law is that it treats subchapter “S” corporations and partnerships as separate taxable entities for BPT and BET purposes, unlike federal law where these are often pure flow-through entities. 20

S-Corporations and Partnerships

• S-Corporations: NH treats S-corps as “C” corporations at the entity level. The credit is claimed on the NH-1120. 20
• Partnerships: The credit is claimed by the partnership on its own NH-1065. 18
• Combined Groups: For businesses operating as part of a combined group, the “Principal NH Filer” typically submits the DP-165. The group is considered a single taxpayer for the purposes of the $50,000 cap. 4

Future Outlook: Legislative Initiatives and Conformity

The landscape for the New Hampshire R&D credit remains dynamic, with regular legislative attempts to increase the program’s impact. 23

Senate Bill 276 (2025)

During the 2025 legislative session, Senate Bill 276 sought to significantly expand the R&D credit. The proposed changes included: 23

• Raising the aggregate statewide cap from $7,000,000 to $10,000,000.
• Doubling the per-taxpayer cap from $50,000 to $100,000.

While the bill passed several committee hurdles with “Ought to Pass” recommendations, it was ultimately tabled in October 2025 and deemed “Inexpedient to Legislate.” The fiscal note for the bill estimated a potential decrease in state revenue of $3,000,000 annually if fully utilized. 23

Conformity to the Internal Revenue Code

New Hampshire has historically been a “static conformity” state, referencing the IRC as it existed on a specific date (e.g., December 31, 2018). This can lead to “decoupling” from federal tax changes, such as the treatment of R&D capitalization under Section 174. 26

However, House Bill 1668 (2024) introduced a potential shift toward “rolling conformity” for the Business Profits Tax, which would automatically adopt federal IRC changes. For the R&D credit, this would mean that changes to the federal definition of “qualified research” or “wages” in IRC Section 41 would automatically apply to the New Hampshire credit calculation without requiring a specific state legislative amendment. 26

Documentation and Audit Preparedness

Given that the New Hampshire R&D credit is strictly limited to manufacturing wages, the DRA and IRS focus heavily on the “nexus” between the employee’s activities and the manufacturing process. 3

Best Practices for Documentation

To survive a DRA audit, businesses must maintain contemporaneous records that go beyond a mere summary of hours. Essential documentation includes: 8

• Time Tracking: Detailed logs identifying the specific project and business component each employee worked on.
• Technical Proof: Project records, lab notes, blueprints, and testing protocols that demonstrate the process of experimentation.
• Wages Verification: Records showing that the wages were subject to NH withholding and were paid for services physically rendered in the state. 3
• Federal Consistency: A copy of the filed (not just pro-forma) Federal Form 6765, ensuring the NH claim perfectly aligns with the federal lines 5 or 24. 6

Common Audit Pitfalls

Taxpayers frequently face challenges when they cannot prove the “manufacturing” nexus. If a company develops software, they must demonstrate that the software is integral to a manufacturing process or is a manufactured business component itself. Purely administrative or customer-facing software generally does not qualify under the state’s manufacturing-specific mandate. 3

Statistics on Credit Utilization

According to the 2024 Tax Expenditure and Potential Liability Report issued by the DRA, the R&D credit is one of the most widely used business tax incentives in the state. 19

The data indicates that while the cap is $7 million, the total used in a given year is often slightly lower due to the five-year carryforward period and the time lag between award notification (September 30) and the filing of final tax returns. 19

Conclusion: Strategic Value of the NH R&D Credit

The New Hampshire Research and Development Tax Credit represents a targeted effort to sustain the state’s historical manufacturing base. By tying the state incentive to the rigorous technical definitions of IRC Section 41, New Hampshire ensures that only high-value, scientifically sound research is rewarded. However, the state’s decision to limit the credit to wages and manufacturing activities requires businesses to be more selective in their claims compared to the federal level.

For businesses operating in New Hampshire, the $50,000 individual cap and the June 30 application deadline are the two most critical operational constraints. Successful utilization of the credit requires a dual-track strategy: maintaining federal-level documentation for the Four-Part Test while simultaneously ensuring that payroll systems can isolate the New Hampshire-based wages that form the core of the state’s manufacturing incentive. As the state moves toward potential rolling conformity with the IRC and continues to debate increasing the program’s funding, the R&D tax credit will remain a vital component of the New Hampshire business tax landscape. 3

R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services

Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.

R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services

creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.

Our Fees

Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/