Design and development of a series of prototypes to achieve the technical objectives (design and development  of the new product range).

The hypothesis for this experiment  stated that designing, testing and evaluating various concepts would contribute to a more efficient and effective prototype testing phase.

Natural Glow conducted  multiple experiments to try and create top-of-the-line products. It then concluded that such a design was feasible, but needed to be prototyped and fully tested to prove the hypothesis.

Trials and analysis of data to achieve results that can be reproduced to a satisfactory standard and to test the hypothesis (prototype development and testing of the new product range).

Natural Glow’s hypothesis for this phase of experimentation was that developing and implementing  various designed components would allow refinement and tweaking of the final result to achieve the objectives of the project.

Natural Glow’s testing proved that the theoretical conclusions from the design phase could be realized through prototype development and related tests. The new knowledge generated would be used for further iterations of design and development and further field testing.

Background research to evaluate current knowledge gaps and determine feasibility (background research for the new product range).

Natural Glow’s background research included:

• Literature search and review.
• Field trips to India and Greece to locate, source and conduct preliminary testing of potential ingredients; to analyze competitors.
• Analysis of consumer behavior and wants (i.e. anti-aging).
• Consultation with industry professionals and potential customers to determine the level of interest and commercial feasibility of such a project.
• Preliminary equipment and resources review with respect to capacity, performance and suitability for the project.
• Consultation with key component/part/assembly suppliers to determine the factors they considered important in the design, and to gain an understanding of how the design needed to be structured accordingly.

The activities conducted in the background research were necessary because they assisted in identifying the key elements of the research project, therefore qualifying as R&D.

Ongoing analysis of customer or user feedback to improve the prototype design (feedback R&D of the new product range).

Natural Glows’ qualifying R&D activities included:

• Ongoing analysis and testing to improve the efficiency and safety of the project.
• Ongoing development and modification to interpret the experimental results and draw conclusions that served as starting points for the development of new hypotheses.
• Commercial analysis and functionality review.
• Consumer trials and feedback.
• Industry evaluations.

These activities were necessary to evaluate the performance capabilities of the new design in the field and to improve any flaws.

Qualified research consists of research for the intent of developing new or improved business components. A business component is defined as any product, process, technique, invention, formula, or computer software that the taxpayer intends to hold for sale, lease, license, or actual use in the taxpayer’s trade or business.

The Four-Part Test

Activities that are eligible for the R&D Credit are described in the “Four-Part Test” which must be met for the activity to qualify as R&D.

1. Permitted Purpose: The purpose of the activity or project must be to create new (or improve existing) functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of a business component.
2. Elimination of Uncertainty: The taxpayer must intend to discover information that would eliminate uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of the business component. Uncertainty exists if the information available to the taxpayer does not establish the capability of development or improvement, method of development or improvement, or the appropriateness of the business component’s design.
3. Process of Experimentation: The taxpayer must undergo a systematic process designed to evaluate one or more alternatives to achieve a result where the capability or the method of achieving that result, or the appropriate design of that result, is uncertain at the beginning of the taxpayer’s research activities.
4. Technological in Nature: The process of experimentation used to discover information must fundamentally rely on principles of hard science such as physical or biological sciences, chemistry, engineering or computer science.

What records and specific documentation did Natural Glow keep?

Similar to any tax credit or deduction, Natural Glow had to save documents that outlined what it did in its  R&D activities, including experimental activities and business records to prove that the work took place in a systematic manner.

Unfortunately, the only records  that Natural Glow saved were literature reviews and background research.

As a company claiming R&D, you always want to be “compliance ready” — meaning if you were audited by the IRS, you could present documentation to show the progression of your R&D work. Here are some types of documentation that would be beneficial to save:

• Project records/ lab notes
• Photographs/ videos of various stages of build/ assembly/ testing
• Prototypes
• Testing protocols
• Results or records of analysis from testing/ trial runs
• Tax invoices
• Patent application number
• Meeting notes or progress reports

Click here for the PDF version of this case study

A pharmaceutical company in New York had never before claimed the R&D credit. This project involved a multiyear study covering the years 2017 thru 2020.

The Company qualified for the federal R&D Tax Credit of $287,560 and an additional $36,000 of state R&D Tax Credit in New York.