The Utah Research and Development Tax Credit allows taxpayers to make an irrevocable election to be treated as a “start-up company” under IRC § 41(c)(3)(B), regardless of their federal status. This election resets the historical base calculation, allowing companies to utilize a statutory 3% fixed-base percentage for their first five years of qualified research in Utah. This provision is critical for companies without a history of research spending in the 1980s or those expanding into Utah, providing a simplified and often more beneficial method for calculating their tax credit.
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 41(c)(3)(B) defines a start-up company as an entity that began its research and gross receipt activities after 1983 or lacks a sufficient historical base period, allowing it to utilize a statutory 3% fixed-base percentage. In the state of Utah, taxpayers may irrevocably elect to be treated as a start-up company for state research credit purposes regardless of their actual federal status, thereby resetting their historical base to a standardized rate to incentivize local innovation.
Statutory Foundation and the Federal-State Nexus
The research and development (R&D) tax credit environment in the United States is characterized by a complex interplay between federal statutes and state-level adoptions. At the federal level, the credit for increasing research activities is governed by IRC § 41. This section was originally designed to encourage the private sector to invest in innovation by providing a tax offset proportional to the increase in research spending over a historical baseline. For the majority of mature taxpayers, this baseline is established using data from a “base period” ranging from 1984 to 1988. However, the passage of time made this period irrelevant for newer companies, leading to the creation of the start-up company provisions under IRC § 41(c)(3)(B).
Utah, recognizing the economic value of high-tech and manufacturing sectors, integrated these federal standards into its own tax code. The primary mechanisms for this are Utah Code § 59-7-612 for corporate franchise taxpayers and Utah Code § 59-10-1012 for individuals, estates, and trusts. While Utah largely mirrors the federal definitions of qualified research and qualified research expenses, it introduces a pivotal deviation: a standalone, irrevocable election to be treated as a start-up company for Utah purposes. This election is particularly significant because it allows a taxpayer to adopt the start-up calculation methodology even if the taxpayer does not meet the federal definition of a start-up company based on its historical activities in the 1980s.
The Mechanics of the Federal Start-up Definition
Under IRC § 41(c)(3)(B), a taxpayer is classified as a start-up company if it meets one of two specific criteria related to its historical operational timeline. The first criterion applies to taxpayers whose first taxable year in which they had both gross receipts and qualified research expenses began after December 31, 1983. The second criterion applies to taxpayers who had fewer than three taxable years between December 31, 1983, and January 1, 1989, in which they possessed both gross receipts and qualified research expenses.
For these entities, the traditional calculation of the “fixed-base percentage”—which for existing companies is the ratio of aggregate qualified research expenses to aggregate gross receipts for the 1984–1988 period—is replaced by a prescriptive, phased-in percentage. This statutory progression is designed to grant newer companies a low, predictable base in their early years, gradually transitioning to a base that reflects their actual research intensity as they mature.
Utah’s Modification of the Start-up Election
The Utah Research and Development Tax Credit is distinguished by its unique treatment of the start-up election. According to Utah Code § 59-7-612(4)(a)(iii)(A), a taxpayer may elect to be treated as a start-up company as provided in IRC § 41(c)(3)(B), regardless of whether the taxpayer meets the specific timing requirements of the federal provision. This means a multi-state corporation that has been in existence since the 1970s but only recently established a research presence in Utah can “elect” into start-up status for Utah tax purposes.
This election is of paramount importance because it allows the taxpayer to ignore its global 1980s-era data—which might be difficult to substantiate or might result in a disadvantageous fixed-base percentage—and instead use the 3% start-up rate for its first five years of Utah research. The election, however, carries a significant caveat: it is irrevocable. Once a taxpayer chooses to be treated as a start-up for Utah purposes, it must follow the phased-in calculation for the duration of its credit claims in the state, even if the traditional method would have eventually yielded a higher credit.
Components of the Utah Research Tax Credit
The Utah credit is not a single calculation but rather the sum of three distinct components. The start-up company election specifically influences the first two components, as they are based on expenses exceeding a “base amount”.
| Credit Component | Statutory Rate | Base Calculation Method | Carryforward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incremental Research Credit | 5% | Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) in excess of the Base Amount | 14 Years |
| Basic Research Credit | 5% | Basic Research Payments in excess of the Base Amount | 14 Years |
| Volume-Based Credit | 7.5% | Total current-year Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) | None |
The base amount is generally defined as the product of the fixed-base percentage and the average annual gross receipts for the four taxable years preceding the credit year. The start-up election modifies the “fixed-base percentage” variable in this equation.
The Fixed-Base Percentage Phase-In Schedule
For a company that has made the start-up election, the fixed-base percentage (FBP) is determined according to a ten-year statutory cycle. This schedule ensures that the company’s base is not immediately burdened by high research intensity during its early, non-revenue-generating years.
| Taxable Year with QREs | Fixed-Base Percentage Calculation |
|---|---|
| 1st through 5th | 3% |
| 6th | 1/6 of (Aggregate QREs for years 4 and 5 / Aggregate Gross Receipts for years 4 and 5) |
| 7th | 1/3 of (Aggregate QREs for years 5 and 6 / Aggregate Gross Receipts for years 5 and 6) |
| 8th | 1/2 of (Aggregate QREs for years 5, 6, and 7 / Aggregate Gross Receipts for years 5, 6, and 7) |
| 9th | 2/3 of (Aggregate QREs for years 5, 6, 7, and 8 / Aggregate Gross Receipts for years 5, 6, 7, and 8) |
| 10th | 5/6 of (Aggregate QREs for years 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 / Aggregate Gross Receipts for years 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) |
| 11th and thereafter | Ratio of aggregate QREs for any 5 years selected from years 5–10 to aggregate Gross Receipts for those years |
The FBP for all companies, whether start-ups or existing, is capped at 16%. This cap prevents the base amount from becoming so large that it effectively eliminates the possibility of earning an incremental credit.
Local State Revenue Office Guidance: Application and Compliance
The Utah State Tax Commission (USTC) provides administrative guidance through various publications, instructions, and administrative rules. While Utah law adopts federal definitions, the application of these rules within the state requires careful attention to Utah-specific sourcing and documentation requirements.
Utah-Sourced Qualified Research Expenses (QREs)
To qualify for the Utah credit, research activities must be conducted within the state. QREs are categorized into in-house research expenses and contract research expenses, mirroring IRC § 41(b), but with a geographic limitation.
In-House Research Expenses: These include wages paid to employees for “qualified services” and amounts paid for supplies used in the conduct of qualified research in Utah. Wages are only eligible if the employee is performing the research within Utah’s borders.
Contract Research Expenses: These consist of 65% of any amount paid to a person (other than an employee) for qualified research performed in Utah. If the research is performed on behalf of the taxpayer by a third party, the activities must physically occur in Utah to be counted toward the state credit.
Determination of Utah Gross Receipts
The “base amount” calculation requires the use of gross receipts. For Utah purposes, “gross receipts” are defined as those receipts attributable to sources within the state. Utah follows market-based sourcing rules for the attribution of receipts from services and intangible property.
Under Utah Admin. Code R865-6F-8 and the market-sourcing provisions of Utah Code § 59-7-311, receipts from services are sourced to Utah if the customer receives the “greater benefit” of the service in Utah. This is a critical factor for the start-up calculation because if a company has high global gross receipts but very few Utah-source receipts, its base amount for the Utah credit will be significantly lower than its federal base amount, thereby increasing the potential state credit.
The 50% Minimum Base Amount Floor
Both the federal and Utah statutes specify that in no event shall the base amount be less than 50% of the qualified research expenses for the credit year. This “floor” acts as a limiter for companies that are extremely research-intensive relative to their gross receipts. For example, if a company has $1,000,000 in QREs and its calculated base amount (FBP multiplied by average gross receipts) is only $100,000, it must use a base amount of $500,000 (50% of $1,000,000) for the credit calculation.
Procedural Requirements for Claiming the Credit
The Utah State Tax Commission does not require a specific standalone form (such as a federal Form 6765) to be filed for the Research Activities credit. Instead, the credit is reported on the taxpayer’s annual income tax return using specific codes.
Reporting on Tax Returns
Corporations (TC-20): The total research credit is reported on Schedule A, line 24, using Code 12.
S-Corporations and Partnerships (TC-20S / TC-65): The credits are calculated at the entity level and passed through to the owners, who report the credit on their individual returns (TC-40A) using Code 12.
Irrevocable Election Mechanism: There is no separate “election form.” The election to be treated as a start-up is effectively made by the taxpayer when they first file a return using the start-up calculation method (3% FBP). Because the election is irrevocable, once a taxpayer has used this method, they are bound to it for all subsequent years.
Electronic Filing and Recordkeeping
The USTC mandates electronic filing for corporate returns and withholding reconciliations. While worksheets and detailed calculations are not submitted with the return, they must be maintained in the taxpayer’s records for inspection during an audit.
Taxpayers are advised to maintain:
Project-Level Documentation: Evidence that the research meets the “Four-Part Test” defined in IRC § 41(d), including technical reports, design documents, and testing logs.
Payroll and Time Records: Documents identifying the specific employees involved in the research and the percentage of their time dedicated to qualified activities in Utah.
Sourcing Support: Worksheets showing how the taxpayer calculated its Utah-source gross receipts for the four years preceding the credit year, including application of market-sourcing rules.
Detailed Example: Application of the Start-up Election
To illustrate the financial implications of the start-up election and the Utah credit’s unique structure, consider a hypothetical corporation, “Nexus BioLabs,” which operates a laboratory in Provo, Utah. Nexus BioLabs began its Utah research operations in 2021. Although the company existed in other states previously, it elects to be treated as a start-up for Utah tax purposes.
Nexus BioLabs Data for 2025 (Credit Year)
2025 Utah QREs: $5,000,000
Utah Gross Receipts (2021): $2,000,000
Utah Gross Receipts (2022): $4,000,000
Utah Gross Receipts (2023): $6,000,000
Utah Gross Receipts (2024): $8,000,000
Basic Research Payments to a Utah University: $200,000
Step 1: Calculate Average Annual Utah Gross Receipts (AGR)
The AGR is the average of the four years prior to the credit year (2021–2024).
AGR = (2,000,000 + 4,000,000 + 6,000,000 + 8,000,000) / 4 = 20,000,000 / 4 = $5,000,000
Step 2: Determine the Base Amount for the Incremental Credit
Because Nexus BioLabs is in its 5th year of having QREs (2021–2025), its Fixed-Base Percentage (FBP) under the start-up election is 3%.
Tentative Base Amount: Base = FBP x AGR = 0.03 x 5,000,000 = $150,000
50% Minimum Floor: Floor = 0.50 x 2025 QREs = 0.50 x 5,000,000 = $2,500,000
Actual Base Amount: The actual base amount is the greater of the tentative base or the floor. Actual Base = max($150,000, $2,500,000) = $2,500,000
Step 3: Calculate the 5% Incremental Credit
The incremental credit is 5% of the QREs in excess of the base amount.
Incremental Credit = 0.05 x (5,000,000 – 2,500,000) = 0.05 x 2,500,000 = $125,000
Step 4: Calculate the 7.5% Volume Credit
The volume credit is 7.5% of the total current-year Utah QREs, with no base amount subtraction.
Volume Credit = 0.075 x 5,000,000 = $375,000
Step 5: Total Credit and Carryforward Application
The total Utah Research Tax Credit for Nexus BioLabs in 2025 is:
Total = $125,000 (Incremental) + $375,000 (Volume) = $500,000
Carryforward Note: If Nexus BioLabs has a 2025 Utah tax liability of only $200,000, it can apply $200,000 of the credit to eliminate its tax. However, the volume credit ($375,000) cannot be carried forward and must be used in the current year or lost. The incremental credit ($125,000) can be carried forward for 14 years. Therefore, Nexus BioLabs would use $200,000 of the volume credit to reach zero tax liability and carry forward the entire $125,000 incremental credit to 2026. The remaining $175,000 of the volume credit expires.
Legislative Context and Future Outlook
The Utah Legislature periodically reviews the effectiveness of research tax credits through the Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee. These reviews assess the cost of the credits, their effectiveness in promoting state-based innovation, and the overall benefit to the Utah economy.
Recent Tax Rate Adjustments
The Utah corporate income tax rate has seen several adjustments in recent years, moving from 4.95% to 4.85% (effective 2022) and further down to 4.5% (effective 2025). These rate reductions increase the relative value of the R&D credit, as companies require a smaller credit amount to offset a larger percentage of their total tax liability. Furthermore, legislation has extended carryforward periods for certain other credits, signaling a general legislative willingness to maintain a competitive tax environment for businesses.
Conformity with Federal Law
Utah Admin. Code R865-6F-14 establishes a general policy of the Tax Commission to follow federal law as closely as possible in determining net income for corporate franchise tax purposes. However, the state’s explicit decoupling regarding the start-up election and the exclusion of the federal Alternative Incremental Credit (AIC) from the base amount calculation highlight Utah’s intent to forge a state-specific innovation policy.
Future Reporting and Federal Changes
The Tax Commission is required to provide an electronic report to the Revenue and Taxation Interim Committee detailing any modifications to the Internal Revenue Code that may impact state revenues. This ensures that if the federal government were to significantly alter IRC § 41, the Utah legislature would have the opportunity to proactively decide whether to maintain conformity or further diverge to protect the state’s innovation incentives.
Final Thoughts and Strategic Considerations for Taxpayers
The IRC § 41(c)(3)(B) start-up company election within the Utah R&D tax credit framework offers a powerful mechanism for both new and established businesses to maximize their state tax savings. By allowing an irrevocable election into the start-up calculation method, Utah provides a simplified and often more lucrative path for companies starting new research ventures in the state.
However, the decision to elect start-up status must be made with a long-term perspective. The irrevocability of the election means that as a company moves into its 6th through 10th years of research, its actual historical ratios will begin to dictate its base amount. For companies that anticipate a rapid increase in gross receipts coupled with steady research spending, the 3% start-up rate is highly beneficial. Conversely, for companies with fluctuating research intensities, a thorough comparison against the traditional historical calculation method is essential to avoid being “locked in” to a disadvantageous future base.
Ultimately, the combination of a 5% incremental credit, a 5% basic research credit, and a 7.5% volume credit positions Utah as one of the more aggressive states in courting high-tech and scientific industries. Taxpayers who meticulously document their research activities and correctly apply the start-up company election can derive substantial economic value, provided they adhere to the specific geographic and sourcing mandates of the Utah State Tax Commission.
Who We Are:
Swanson Reed is one of the largest Specialist R&D Tax Credit advisory firm in the United States. With offices nationwide, we are one of the only firms globally to exclusively provide R&D Tax Credit consulting services to our clients. We have been exclusively providing R&D Tax Credit claim preparation and audit compliance solutions for over 30 years. Swanson Reed hosts daily free webinars and provides free IRS CE and CPE credits for CPAs.
Are you eligible?
Why choose us?
Pass an Audit?
What is the R&D Tax Credit?
The Research & Experimentation Tax Credit (or R&D Tax Credit), is a general business tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 41 for companies that incur research and development (R&D) costs in the United States. The credits are a tax incentive for performing qualified research in the United States, resulting in a credit to a tax return. For the first three years of R&D claims, 6% of the total qualified research expenses (QRE) form the gross credit. In the 4th year of claims and beyond, a base amount is calculated, and an adjusted expense line is multiplied times 14%. Click here to learn more.
Never miss a deadline again
Stay up to date on IRS processes
Discover R&D in your industry
R&D Tax Credit Preparation Services
Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or email our CEO, Damian Smyth on (800) 986-4725.
Feel free to book a quick teleconference with one of our national R&D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.
R&D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services
creditARMOR is a sophisticated R&D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees—delivering robust, compliant support for R&D credit claims. Click here for more information about R&D tax credit management and implementation.
Our Fees
Swanson Reed offers R&D tax credit preparation and audit services at our hourly rates of between $195 – $395 per hour. We are also able offer fixed fees and success fees in special circumstances. Learn more at https://www.swansonreed.com/about-us/research-tax-credit-consulting/our-fees/
